Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise of them to do so.

like him i had signature that stuffed up the viewing for some people on here but i wasnt aware due view being ok for me , an i idea might be to politely ask the person with that signature to resize it or to let a moderator know so they can advise them to do so.

I think it should be limited too. Both dimensions (400 pixels max width) and file size. Makes it hard for 56k users. Not all people know you can turn them off either. Personally I think it's a curtious thing for the users to have a decent sized image.

When I join a bored it's the first thing I turn off. Unfortunatly many people go "see my sig" for a lot of things. So you miss alot.

  • 2 weeks later...

i remember this arguement from ages ago...we were trying to decide whether we should allow pics at all, and we decided yes but to limit the size.

so to answer your question, yes there is a limit...and it's up to the mods at their discretion to ask ppl to reduce them if they think it's too big.

you guys can help us out by sending one of us a pm if you spot one...

and i agree with Shane, having to scroll side to side is a pain in the ass :P

His sig is a link to a commercial website. Surely that shouldn't be allowed unless he's a forum sponsor?

Why pay for a banner if you can just put it in your sig and postwhore? :)

Just increase your desktop resolution.  Im running 1600x1200 and no need to complain. LuKaS's signature looks normaled siezed to me

you sig fills my whole screen.

i use hi-res @ work. but at home i like something easy on my eyes.

and pages long sigs aint one of those easy things

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Being the top Google search result for R34 wheel-related inquiries, lemme throw down my experience. I calculated that 100mm from hub face to wheel face is about the perfect fitment for my ENR34 sedan.  I've been running 18x8.5s, ET35, with a 1" spacer. So, 8.5in to mm = 216mm. 216/2 = 108mm. 108-35 = 73mm. 73+ 25 (1" to mm) = 98mm.  If you wanna get close to this on dif widths, here are the offsets you'll want: 9" - ET around 15mm 9.5" - ET around 20mm 10" - you're crazy, but ET around 30mm All these should fit perfectly on a non-widebody, non-GTR Skyline. Note that it's probably the absolute max, and you're probably better off running a couple degrees of camber in this config, but it looks great, super flush.
    • Oh yeah, always always always turn over an engine by hand first.
    • So by that logic, an insanely expensive GTR for $200k+ is quite cheap, at 12% of Sydney's median house price compared to over 50% when a GTR was new...
    • Apologies... thought i had outlined it... Cheers for the response, I'll get a nipple sorted out for this.
    • lol thanks for the pics but some arrows might have helped for context. If you mean the bit I've badly traced in red, that is a PITA vacuum signal for the power steering pump, only R34 GTT was "lucky" enough to get it. Yes you will need a nipple of the same size somewhere in the intake between the air filter and the throttle or the power steering idle up will not work correctly
×
×
  • Create New...