Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Spooks

Yes thats true for most standard ecu - wrx is no different.

Just with the link even when tuned well - it will still run alittle rich - its like a built in insurance policy with the link.

you'll see if you gt a link ;0>

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, if your going to make a bold statement like that, you need to suggest/list some factual information here.

ok. A few important things for me are

1) A good tuner... which leads into 2...

2) A good tuner that wont charge you an arm and a leg

and for one thing, in Vic that is very hard to find when compared to a PFC or a Wolf.

I dare say that applies to most other states in this fine country

i NEVER had this issue with my LINK when it was tuned properly.

One thing that rings true though is that my car chews through fuel, and runs extremely rich.

You've even said it runs hell rich.

i wouldnt call that a good tune. A good tune wont ever run lean BTW

also.. Does the link use the knock sensor input???

I am currently running a Link Plus in my car and i am very happy with it. I have also had a Power FC and if i had to choose between the two i would choose the Link Plus anyday of the week. I previously had too many problems with AFM's etc and decided to change to Link and haven't looked back the only ECU i would replace it with would be an Autronic or Motec but obviously they are much more expensive.

Anyone who has doubts - please look at the link a pasted on page 1 and look at the lack of load points, lack of fuctionality, etc the link has compared to a better ecu.

Yes the fact that the link doesnt use the AFM is great - and as i said my Link was OK - but just look at the simple facts and you'll see that its lacking badly.

Dan

Does the Link (and all the other ECU's that suffer poor fuel economy) have Closed loop running?

It was my understanding that ECU's that dont do this arnt legal as they dont comply with the ADR's. On the back of the Microtech LT1200(?) it says in small print "For racing use only" because of this.

OH dear, another "XXXX ecu versus Power FC" thread......

This is how I see it.....

a lot of the NZ guys use LINK ecus

That's because they are made in NZ

I previously had too many problems with AFM's etc and decided to change to Link
So you had problems with a standard Nissan part and it was the Power FC's fault. More likely yours for not servicing your AFM's properly.

At least you could easily get a replacement, wait until a MAP sensor fails and you get

AVO have no more map sensors, and they dont know when they will be getting anymore... so this is stressing me out big time.
i guess the wrx link plugin is similar to the gtslink
Ahh no, the WRX is a 4 cylinder and the GTST is a 6 cylinder.
for about 800/900 bucks seand hand its OK....
So they depreciate (loose their value) pretty quickly, I wonder why? At $1100 new, Power FC's seem to hold their value pretty well, I wonder why?
i cant expect a car with 300+rwhp to be decent on fuel.
How about 9.4 litres per hundred kilometres from Sydney to Wakfield Park and back (400 k's). And it has a lot more than 300 rwhp. That will save you the $200 price difference pretty quickly.
the car would smoothly decellaratedown in revs and speed with suck utter smoothness
You don't have to tune that with a Power FC, it comes standard in the base maps. That will save you more than the $200 difference in price in extra tuning costs.
good luck with PowerFC and it working from just being plugged in
Must be the way I plug them in, I'm up to ~15 Power FC's and not one car has failed to start first turn of the key and then be driven without issue to the dyno shop for a tune. Cars with the usual mods (exhaust, filter, boost up) drive better than standard most times. I must just be lucky, huh?
link is better then a few of the other choices on the market
I have compared a Link side by side with a Microtec, Haltec and Wolf and I can't see any demonstrable superiorities. As for Power FC, Motec, Electromotive and Autronic .....well not even close.

The bottom line, if you want your car to drive as "nice" as it did when standard and not cost an arm and leg to buy install, and tune, then there is only one choice in my opinion. The Power FC is unmatched in all those areas, it's the best all round ECU for a Skyline.

:rofl:

OH dear, another "XXXX ecu versus Power FC" thread......

it wasnt supposed to be

ive been told that powerfc wont work on my setup, so im investigating alternatives

was just suprised at how little information there was on links on this forum

thanks for you input anyway sydney kid

imacul8, the link plus has all the features you claim it doesn't including temp correction.. does the power fc? runs the std knock sensor also. The ecu comparison link you posted up fails to list most of the links features...

you also fail to mention how many countless hours the holinger equipped car you mention spent on the dyno at west racing?

I agree its far from the best ecu on the market but it does a good job in mine and countless other cars and for the dollars you can't complain.

Nismoid your initial comment on the subject is laughable, shit if everyone on the forum isnt using it, it must be crap.. ? Well done

How about 9.4 litres per hundred kilometres from Sydney to Wakfield Park and back (400 k's).  And it has a lot more than 300 rwhp.   That will save you the $200 price difference pretty quickly.

haha Douche,

Fcuk highway kilometres. I was talking CITY driving, because thats where it fcuks you the hardest.

Highway my fuel consumption is no problems.

DCIEVE

I also fogot to mention that a certain holiger equiped car spent hours being retuned at another perth wokshop.

Agreed tuning is the key.

But more load points (both ignition and fuel) allows for a smoother finer tune.

haha Douche,

Fcuk highway kilometres.  I was talking CITY driving, because thats where it fcuks you the hardest.

Highway my fuel consumption is no problems.

Obviously you don't live in Sydney, there is an hour of traffic to get to the highway.:)

imacul8, the link plus has all the features you claim it doesn't including temp correction.. does the power fc?  

The Power FC has tables for;

Water temp injection correction

Air temp injection correction

Air temp boost correction (if you have the Boost Control Kit)

Ignition water temp correction

Ignition air temp correction

Ignition boost correction

Battery voltage injection correction

Battery voltage ignition correction

And it flashes the standard dash warning light when;

Injector duration exceeds your selected value

Knock exceeds your selected value

Airflow exceeds your selected value

I agree its far from the best ecu on the market but it does a good job in mine and countless other cars and for the dollars you can't complain.  

I'm sorry but I CAN COMPLAIN, if I add it all up the Link actually costs more. It takes longer to install, it's not really plug and play, it doesn't have the quality support maps loaded and correction tables preset, the tuning is far more difficult....Someone has to pay for this additional labour, and that means you.

ive been told that powerfc wont work on my setup, so im investigating alternatives
If the Power FC "won't work" (whatever that means), then the Link sure as hell won't.

I have seen Power FC's running cars with 1100+ bhp, so obviously power isn't the problem. The only issue I can think of is auto transmission, and I can assure you that the Link won't run the auto much worse than the Power FC won't.

So post up what it is that you have been told the Power FC won't do. I am sure someone on here will be able to tell you how to do it.

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
    • Temp = -21.052 X Voltage + 114   That should get you pretty close. Calcs based on two points I could do easy calcs on (30 and 70 degrees).   It also says your sensor should only read as low as 9 degrees when it maxes out at 5V, and should hit a peak of 114 degrees at 0V... Just as a heads up if you were going really cold places, or wanting to be aware when temps really go up with it.
×
×
  • Create New...