Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any skyline is part of a long line of family cars - they (for the most part) just happen to be very well equipped 'family' cars. I wouldn't be using the 'family car' theory as any part of a slanging match. It's a bit of a moot point anyway - it's an argument that doesn't go anywhere, or prove anything.

About all you can criticise the falcons for is weight (and build quality). 'Different' handling is a by-product of that weight - they certainly can get around the track fast enough, but won't have the 'feel' that many appreciate.

4L + big factory turbo will always = very impressive power. Luckily for the skyline boys, it seems that the xr6 can't get the power down to the ground particularly well (seems to be a common ford trait).

The biggest plus for the ford is that you can buy it easily at any ford dealership, brand spanking new, and with a worthwhile warranty (how often you need to use said warranty is another matter altogether...).

I wouldn't buy one, but I won't knock their abilities either.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I wasn't knocking thier abilities, just commenting on each cars strengthes/purposes.

If your requirment for a car is to carry the kids and wife with a caravan on a holiday, then a falcon/commodore would be a good choice

If your requirment for a car is to squirt around a race track, then a GTR/skyline would be a good choice.

ah boy another can of worms.

All I can compare is the difference I had in the 33GTST with say my father in laws 2002 SS.

With the Skyline there is a feeling of being integrated with the car. The SS on the other hand kind of feels like a powerful sled or something the way it travels around bends and such feels like its sliding all the time.

Heh if i go for a drive now in a newish com or falc i start feeling sick due to the way those cars handle inertia etc - too used to sporty suspension. Guess I was just wondering if XR6t was similar in those respects.

PS I use Firefox and it crashed for the first time yesterday. Reinstall did the jobbie.

I wasn't knocking thier abilities, just commenting on each cars strengthes/purposes.

If your requirment for a car is to carry the kids and wife with a caravan on a holiday, then a falcon/commodore would be a good choice

If your requirment for a car is to squirt around a race track, then a GTR/skyline would be a good choice.

Ha ha ha - not knocking the GTR's, but look at how many have had fatal engine damage recently from a fang on the race track.... (remember, I own a GTR....)

Ha ha ha - not knocking the GTR's, but look at how many have had fatal engine damage recently from a fang on the race track....  (remember, I own a GTR....)

None down here in vic (yet) :rofl: *touch wood*

I wonder how an XR8/XR6T would go running similar lap times as the GTR's down here, would it last ?

You can get the Falcons to handle better by spending $3-$4K. But thats a lot of money compared to the fact that you dont need to spend much on a Skyline.

yeah, for 2.5 k my mates cars handles much better than stock, but that still doesn't make up for the weight penalty that the ford carries.

and tell me why the xr6t's have the airbox on the opposite side to the turbo??? Just leads to more piping...bad design

anyway, guys at work have the xr6t on a lease and they've all had the following problems:

1) intercooler hoses blowing off

2) Engine stalling when stopping suddenly

3) Tailshaft problems

4) Coolant leaks

5) Brake shudder

6) Steering rack issues

There are about 10 guys in my team and 4 of them have xr6t's and every single one of them experienced the above mentioned problems.

There was a comparison done on one of the latest Serious Performance? vids from memory, of a 4 dour gtst vs xr6t.

With Ian Luff involved in the xr6t and some other driver in the skyline.

First off they took a tiptronic R34 auto, it got whopped big time, not to mention the handling was like a boat of a 4 door.

Then they took out a modified 4 door with suspension upgrade and it kept up with the xr6t and handled better. (but the xr6t was still stock as a rock)

Im sure some of you have seen the segment?

and tell me why the xr6t's have the airbox on the opposite side to the turbo??? Just leads to more piping...bad design

anyway, guys at work have the xr6t on a lease and they've all had the following problems:

1) intercooler hoses blowing off

2) Engine stalling when stopping suddenly

3) Tailshaft problems

4) Coolant leaks

5) Brake shudder

6) Steering rack issues

There are about 10 guys in my team and 4 of them have xr6t's and every single one of them experienced the above mentioned problems.

didnt you read the special features part of your owners manual, you paid for all those problems, you and 90 percent of the other people foolish enough to buy a new falcon

just keep booking it back into your delearship and it will all get fixed under waranty sooner or later

There was a comparison done on one of the latest Serious Performance? vids from memory, of a 4 dour gtst vs xr6t.

 

 With Ian Luff involved in the xr6t and some other driver in the skyline.

 

 First off they took a tiptronic R34 auto, it got whopped big time, not to mention the handling was like a boat of a 4 door.

 

Then they took out a modified 4 door with suspension upgrade and it kept up with the xr6t and handled better. (but the xr6t was still stock as a rock)

 

 Im sure some of you have seen the segment?

So an R34 4 door handles like a boat? How is it different from a 2 door suspension wise?

I have stock suspension. Check my signature.

I was under the impression that the 4 door has softer suspension for the occupants, more of a people mover and looking at the footage on the video, it must be, never seen a 2 door go over on two wheels and stuff.

Ill find out what dvd it was, i borrowed them off a mate.

Its worth a look for sure, if you really want to see the xr6t vs 4 door skyline part.

Someone here must have seen it and can also comment?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...