Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

WHIPPLEFLOWCHART.jpg

this is a lysholm 2300 (marketed as whipple) flow chart. give me opinions on what sort of final pressure i would be looking at for an RB25/30 combo engine (standard head + cams, 8.3 compression ratio and standard bottom end) if the engine revved to 6,500 rpm and the blower was driven at 2x crank speed to keep the rev ceiling at 13,000rpm.

just after opinions if anyone can interpret the flow chart better than i can! i expect the engine to produce roughly 400-450 horsepower at the crank.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/66825-flow-chart-help-me-interpret-it/
Share on other sites

Simple stuff.........

*You need ~10 lbs of air per minute to make ~100 bhp.

*So if you want 485 bhp (450 + 35) you need ~49 lbs of air per minute

*At sea level etc , 45 lbs of air per minute is around 17 cubic metres per minute

*Go up from the 17m3/m pont on the bottom axis and it's most efficient area (65%) is 1.75 pressure ratio (~0.75 bar boost).

*The air is going to be 100 degrees C (the red line) and that's hot, so you will need some cooling of the charge ie; water injection, intercooler etc

*It is going to be running at 86% efficiency (the purple line)

*Note that the supercharger itself is going to need 34 bhp (25 kw) from the engine to run it (the green line). That's why I used 485 bhp above.

*So you will need around 8,000 rpm, plus 14%, say 10,000 rpm

*At double cranksahft speed that means max power at ~5,000 rpm, not bad for an engine with a redline at 6,500 rpm.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

yeah good stuff - wasn't sure on the conversion stuff (BHP to airflow particularly) so that's nice work. i'm thinking if running the blower at 2x crank speed and venting the excess air via a turbo external wastegate in the induction piping somewhere, so i can vary the boost if i want to. the charge will be heavily intercooled, yes, i am using a good front-mount and thinking of running a custom water/air after the other intercooler which i can pack with icy water for dyno runs/drag runs.

venting the excess air via a turbo external wastegate in the induction piping somewhere.

I think a BOV would be more applicable than a wastegate, too slow and way over engineered for inlet air. Use a positive boost controller (like the Jaycar IEBC) to control the BOV opening.:P

how? the BOV only has a fitting on the top, to help it open under vacuum obviously. wouldn't you need something like a wastegate which has a pressure fitting such that compressed air will force it open against the spring pressure?

the only way i can think of doing it with a BOV is by altering the spring rate till it was just right, but i doubt it would work properly?

how? the BOV only has a fitting on the top, to help it open under vacuum obviously. wouldn't you need something like a wastegate which has a pressure fitting such that compressed air will force it open against the spring pressure?

the only way i can think of doing it with a BOV is by altering the spring rate till it was just right, but i doubt it would work properly?

The better BOV's have two air supply inlets. One for vacuum and one for pressure. Use the pressure inlet (under the diaphram) and it will open the valve when air flows. Leave the vacuum inlet open to atmosphere. Then use a boost controller to open a solenoid and allow air flow (boost pressure) to the BOV when the target boost is reached. You can of course by supercharger blow off valves, they come with a box of springs, so you can adjust to your boost target. But I like the idea of of eletronically controlling the boost.

:P

ah, that's pretty much exactly what i was going to do, with a turbo external gate. i am already using a garrett 32mm wastegate as a bypass valve for the blower i have now, i was thinking about getting a second one and doing exactly what you just described. however hiding two wastegates in the piping could be somewhat interesting, at least the coppers wouldn't know what it was.......

p.s. i've personally never seen a BOV with two fittings like that, and i suspect they'd be expensive? can you throw me a brand or a link or something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
    • I just try to entirely stay away from ladder now unless it's something basic maintained by electricians. Even then and to your point, it mostly ends up being blocks I wrote in structured text.  PLC's are slowly going towards C, C++ and C#. I just wish Allen-Bradley would jump on the bandwagon. 
    • All of them are missing. You do not get much done with just AND, OR and NOT unfortunately. Ecumaster for example has a text based editor with at least 60+ math and logic instructions. 
×
×
  • Create New...