Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was reading some of the rice vs non rice threads and i have come to the conclusion that all r33s are rice, Because if they actually wanted a real performance car, they would have bought an r32. Insted of just a car that looks like a performance car.

hehe

oh well just a little dig just trying to start some feeling for the 4 6s and rotory day, rb20 vs rb25, let the fun begin

:uzi:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mine isn't.

It's an 'all aussi' nationalised migrant (minus the roo-bar, open roof for shooting, offroad tyres and spotties).

I've got dents that are over 2years old red dust all underneath (from driving on unsealed roads) and stock appearance.

Like the pintara style, nothing like bringing down the rev-head posers with a 'sleeper' family car. :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-99910
Share on other sites

ive got nothing against 32's, i quite like em actually, but dont they improve things with each model change?? thats what impression i was under anyway, learn from old mistakes, well not necassarily mistakes but just to better things, if they didnt think it was better why would they change it??

:)

Cam.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100058
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Boostzor

Do u think the new WRX fits that description?

Good theory but not always true. U have to admit the 33 is more of a tourer while the 32 is a 'true' sports car.

hasn't the 2002 bug eyed wrx got less power than the ones before???

and agree'd about the 32 being more of a sports car, and the 33, well could class as a sports/tourer :lol:

Cam.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100064
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Boostzor

U have to admit the 33 is more of a tourer while the 32 is a 'true' sports car.

What's the definition of a true sports car?

Therefore is an MX5 a True,True sports car?

Nissan in there wildest dreams would not claim any Skyline as a "True Sports Car" ....Sporting yes.

Nissan badge their Skylines GT's translated from italian is Grand tourer so if the 33 is more of a tourer it is the better car than the 32 in your opinion boostzor ?

In my opinion car makers must improve each successive model overall or go out of business

Cheers

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100142
Share on other sites

Note i said " 'true' sports car" not "true sports car" i reckon there is a difference.

IMHO a 'true sports car' is light, powerful (good power to weight), RWD or 4wd and has a wide/low wheelbase.

Left wing being sports and right wing being tourer i would have to say while the 33 is left of centre the 32 is more so. Well thats what i reckon anyhow.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100171
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skyzerr33

pitty that pintara will hand u your arse

I'm not too sure about that dude... i do recall crashtzors cruise (the night of his demise!) some time ago where i had a small run againt the pintara (RB20LagWagon0 i was in front by a bit but only marginally... since then i have had a few mods done... even if RB20Lagwagon has done mods then he will have to spend a few $$$ giving Killer T ago, i know Killer T could whip me even now that i have spent a few $$$ on mine...

I dunno your list of mods RB20Lagwagon but they would have to be a lot to give Killer T a go.

I have no doubt that RB20Lagwagon is quick skyzer but it would take a bit to beat Killer T

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100216
Share on other sites

Originally posted by R34

In my opinion car makers must improve each successive model overall or go out of business

Cheers

Chris

thats exactly what i thought, they wouldn't change something if it didn't need improving, they would try new things and test new things and implement the changes on the newer models.

Cam.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100340
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Boostzor

Note i said " 'true' sports car" not "true sports car" i reckon there is a difference.

Get a Ferrari and no one can argue with that.......

it'll be so true, with or without any punctuation placements

:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6727-are-all-r33s-rice/#findComment-100369
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
    • You can get them with the worm drive rotator but I was too tight to pay another $250-$300 so manual labour it is! I don't think it will be too hard to rotate though. 
    • Sag as in the windows start to slowly open themselves, or they're just slow to go up/down with engine off?
    • It looks like it needs a big worm gear drive on it to control the rotating, not a few sloppy pins!
    • As Duncan said, first there was OBD, which few cars used, then came OBD2.   Now an interesting point, OBD2 isn't even for what you want to do. OBD2 is for emissions testing. There is some sensor data on OBD2, but it's up to the manufacturer what they're putting on it. Most scan tools operate on UDS, which like OBD2 is a standard built on-top of CAN. UDS specifies how to structure a message, what very limited things mean such as "read memory address" but it does not specify what is stored in which memory address, that is all up to the manufacturer. You either a scan tool compatible with that vehicle, or to know how to reverse engineer all the data, which can take a VERY long time and a lot of vehicles to get it right. Oh and then the manufacturer does a firmware update and changes what's where... Ask me how I know that as fact Oh, and by the time you've got the scan tool that supports all the manufacturers stuff, well, you're back at "But a consult cable and the Nissan software" The main difference being most manufacturers software these days works with the same hardware readers, as the readers are built to support J2534 which is another standard for how the PC communicates with the tool to make it do specific things on the car...
×
×
  • Create New...