Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heya,

Iv'e decided to put my car up for sale.

Car is also up on www.fullboost.com.au with all specs and better pics....

Anyways..

Car: 1994 Laguna Blue Mx5 Clubman

Specs

* 1.8 motor

* 320HP T28 Turbo

* front mount

* Kevlar heavy duty clutch

* bigger injectors

* Torsen LSD

* Custom Piping

* EMS dual sport computer with handset

* Oil catch can

* Aluminium radiator don by Mr.Enforcer

* 2.5" stainless steel Exhaust

* 15" wheels off newer model Mx5

* Brown davis roll bar

* koni adjustable suspension + camber kit

* Mazda speed Dash

* Autometer gauges oil/water/boost custom installed on passanger side dash

* Vented discs for better braking

* EBC greenstuff pads

* pivot headlight controller

* twin high volume thermo fans

* Fidanza Alu Flywheel

* High Volume fuel pump (injectors are RC Engineering 370cc)

* King Springs, JDM Sways (+1mm rear on Aus spec)

* Alpine head unit with Alpine V12 amp and kicker 6.2 spits/tweeters up front. JL Audio 10"

* Car made 171 RWKW on a hot day.

Ive probably forgotten alot of things.... Please no time wasters, some of you may have seen this car out and about on some of the cruises, car is immac and handles as wll as it goes...

Car ran a 12.9 @ 106 MPH first outing with knackered 195's and old dump pipe. 60Fter was 2.1 which indicates the car has alot more in it. With the new dump pipe and better tyres car would crack a mid 12 with ease.

mx5_suli_01b.jpg

mx5_suli_02b.jpg

mx5_suli_03b.jpg

mx5_suli_04b.jpg

mx5_suli_05b.jpg

mx5_suli_07b.jpg

mx5_suli_09b.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...