Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This Group buy is for a hybrid copy intercooler size being 450 x 300 x 76mm. Need 5 people to register for the cooler to cost $280 + delivery($20). Cooler are here right now so once we get 5 people I can ship them off or you can pick it up.

HERE ARE THE SPECS.

Attrictive polished aluminum look

3" inlet and 3" outlet pipes for high flow

Low pressure drop 0.2psi at 15psi of boost

80 psi for up to 800 horses

Made by lightweight but strong material. Same Structure and material used as famous "Hibrid" Intercooler. Weight ~8kg

All coolers have been Pressure tested.

15 bars core design. For more efficient air flow over the older 16 bar design.

PACKAGING

As seen in the picture the cardboard box has polystyrene strips to protect the fins from transport damage. The cardboard box is even double up in places for extra strength.

PAYMENT

Payment must be by Direct Deposit.

Local Pickup is available. Save postage

Registered Interests

1) Predator

2)

3)

4)

5)

FAQ

$5 per cooler will be donated to SAU

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68130-intercooler-450mm-x-300mm-x-76mm/
Share on other sites

I'm definitely in, as I just sold my larger one..

These are a great fit for R32 guys, without having to go as crazy cutting the bumper to hell and back like with the wider one.

flex: This item is for the intercooler only...you can get piping kit from car performace stores. I will be able to do piping kit in the near future sometime - not quite sure when though.

GTR 94: I will be lying if I try an answer this question. :rofl: Anyone know?

MJKAPC.. I've measured it, and the 450x300x75 cooler is that much better for fitting under an R32 gts-t with stock front bar.. compared to the extra 20cm of the larger one that many people have (and cut to crap front bars)

You will still have to cut the bottom of the bar a little.. but you shouldn't have to cut the main bumper support due to the width, which you would for the larger one.

So I believe anyhow, that is should be a much better fit, and that's why I'm getting one ;) so buy one, and I can save $20 :cheers:

OK guys I have recieved your money. I tried to get the coolers on the weekend but he had no stock on him. He stores them in a warehouse somewhere. I was told I can pick them up today if I can get intouch I will drop down to pick them up tonight.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...