Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm just wondering whether skylines lose a lot gettig from the flywheel to RWKW?

A stock R33 gtst Flywheel = 187kw

At the wheels = 140kw????

I saw an article in the latest motor/wheels magazine on VY SS and BA V8 falcon upgrades.

I think the SS stock was 245kw Flywheel and 221kw at the treads. After $1000 rechip it was 240RWKW and 1/4mile in about 12.8!!!!! and 0-100 in mid 5s

If these are the right figures then there is minilmal drivetrain losses with the holden compared to the skylines....

average stock rwkw 4 a R33 GTS-T would be roughly about 130kw depending on gearbox/age of vehicle etc.

yep of course the ss & ba have minimal drivetrain losses compared with the r33 skyline! they are brand new cars..r33's are between 8 & 12 years old this year :cheers:

the age/condition of a vehicle plays a big part when it comes 2 drivetrain losses

r33 rb25 losses through the drive train are about 60 to 65 kw, dont believe everything that you read in motor magazines. theres no way that a v8 losses only 20kws through their drive train! if anything they would loose more than a rb25. id say holden has paid of the magazine to talk it up!!

as an aside - as if motor isn't on holden's payroll

explain how a commodore / variant that pisses power steering fluid at the track makes a minor placing at PCOTY??

especially since HSV are 'track oriented' eg SV6000

/end rant/

I dont see why because they are brand new they would lose less. There is no major technology breakthrough in terms of gearbox/drivetrain.  Maybe they are talking it up!!!

So what u r saying is that a 1993 model stock R33 which was dynoed directly off the showroom floor back in 1993 would give the same figure as a 1993 model stock R33 which was dynoed in 2005? Interesting...

Maybe lose 5kw. A new engine will take about 10k -20k kms before it loosens up. In fact when I was working at ford even some of the other engineers thought the cars that had done 90k kms etc were quicker than the ones that were near new.

Most R33s would have more than this amount of kays and obviously older than AU falcons but I still reckon most of the good ones would be within 5-10kw of showroom spec

how can it do 1/4 mile in 12.8 and have a speed of 0 - 100 of mid 5's wtf , a r32 gtr is quoted at doing 0 - 100 in ~ 4.94 and have a 1/4 mile of 12.94

umm... tell me if im wrong but... different gearing, different touqe and a different power curve, different cars make the power at different rpm, cant compare cars guys, ones a v8 family car (lets face it) and the other is designed to get to the 400m as fast as possible. two cars designed for different reason. PS, I love my holdens, but motor is full of BS.

BUt yeah, stick the wot the guy asked For. Wots the stock RWHP of a R33 GTS

All manufacturers quote power at the flywheel, so the 225 Gen III's are in fact 225 at the flywheel not the wheels, just a point of reference.

And it is correct about drivetrain losses, it is also related to gearing and other factors such as fluids.

Here is a a post I prepared earlier, that a search found for me;

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you put a car on a chassis dyno (roller or hub style) there are power losses, in the gearbox, the tailshaft universals, the diff, the driveshaft universals, the wheel bearings, the tyres and the rollers themselves. In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested. A couple of which we have also run up on the engine dyno confirm this.

Obviously when you add a transfer case, front diff, front drive shaft universals, front tyres and the extra rollers you loose more power. Around 20-25 kw based on what we see with GTR's.

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

I should point out that there are no "losses", Newtons law applies, "energy can neither be gained nor lost". So the 60 kw is not "lost" it is transformed into other types of energy, in the car's case that's generally heat.

Hope that is of some help :D

As you add more power to a engine do you lose more power or is it the same?

e.g. does 270rwkw car have 270kw + 60kw =330kw at flywheel or 26% lose 100/74*270=364kw at the flywheel?

Yes I guess you would loose more power as you add more engine power. You are putting more stress and adding more heat to the drivetrain.

As engine power increases, the drivetrain losses would increase to a point but not at anywhere near the same rate.

I think what SK was alluding to is that there is a certain amount of power the drivetrain will transform into heat and thats about it.

Using the "rule of thumb", an R33 GTST manual that cranked out say 800rwkw, using the 26% rule would have 1008kw at engine. Thats 208kw that would have to be transfered into heat. Now I'm out of my league in making any educated guess as to what the gearbox and diff temps would equate to but Im sure its damn hot.

The percentage rule seems to sell a lot of magazines though..........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The cam I am actually putting in (a few posts up) is actually smaller than my current one. At least duration/overlap wise. All the chop stuff I hear just sounds like an engine running badly, because it is. I then envision driving it around in 1st gear and being massively sad about it bucking to the beat of said chop. There is an idle video of someone with a similar cam floating around the internet, but mine is a custom cam (so is his) so it'll never be the same, plus the fact exhausts are entirely different. What I want to do is put some bullet mufflers/race mufflers in to replace a couple sections straight pipes that currently replace the two extra cats that I don't need. But this is even further down the line!
    • I can tell you now, when the bracket that the little hydraulic ram attaches to snaps, with a subframe, and V8 from an AMG C63 on it, it sounds like someone letting shotgun off right beside you. It leaves your ears ringing, and a huge thankfulness that you never ever put a body part under something heavy that's only supported by a hydraulic lift...
    • Still not a guarantee fix. I used a high quality butyl-mastiq (the black goo that's not really silicone nor polyurethane, same stuff they use from the factory that just spreads out like melty cheese), and I still get lots of water on both sides of the trunk when raining or washing the car. I also suspect the factory spoiler rubber gasket might not be sealing well, so I'm thinking of adding a thin layer of grey silicone around the bolt holes on both sides and see if that's where it also leaks from. The biggest issue is that these cars don't come with a drain hole on each side like other coupes and hatchbacks.
    • I hate it, but maybe he could paint it Monster jam style and call it...godzilla?
    • Would seem to me to be appropriate to go GTR style bar. There are options with and without N1 vent holes, with the GTR lower lip integral (because FG copy). https://justjap.com/search?q=r32 bumper  
×
×
  • Create New...