Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

reliability aside, it looks beta, has lower cd, more economical, can take 4 ppl easily, has got full options and can take a beating.

well it looks alright, but parts are a joke I'd guess, and mod wise, um no, and if you get the turbo 4wd version it's probably even worse.

Not a bad car for an opel or vauxhall nut. But not really a car to buy if you going for straight out performance / fun I'd say.

It's in a different league.

reliability aside, it looks beta, has lower cd, more economical, can take 4 ppl easily, has got full options and can take a beating.

depends on which skyline your talking about. Maybe it can take 4 people easily when compared to the r32 - but r33 and r34s can take 4 people easily.

Sure its more economical - but the same way, I can say my jazz is more economical that the calibra. Cant really compare either of the 3 cars.

And with regards to beatings, the RB engine is supposed to be one of the toughest engines out there......plenty of guys/gals here who have given their skylines heaps of good floggings and still have a very reliable car

not trying to diss you, but just saying...

did you get ur pricing quotes from holden??? cause they are the worst when it comes to our cars we all hate em but we get all our stuff from the uk and in the end it's 100's cheaper. yeh def not a proper performance car but it's good and yeh diff league but all im saying their not shit

mostly cause they're over rated and too popular (not a much as a corolla but u no)

Maybe coz they are good in their range?

Like wise in the family sedan segment most people on fourms seems to hate the camrys with the the main critisim being "too boring" & "too common", did they ever consider that the are too common coz they are good in their range?

reliability aside, it looks beta, has lower cd, more economical, can take 4 ppl easily, has got full options and can take a beating.

Err, reliability should be a high priority when looking at any car, regardless of the class. Looks is subjective, just googled some pics of the car (didn't even know holden had a car like that with all the SSs I see around...) Iooks okish to me I guess, got used to looking at my mum's VN.

& my R33 can fit 4 ppl in easily, it got more space on the back than my dad's mazada Bi2600 ute

Guest trikdoutvl

LMAO lol damm small world LMAO EY JACK wats up its scott with the cali u looked at the other day LOL

for any1 interested i got a 4wd turbo manual calibra for the guy who started this thread

calibra's a nice looking car but so is a skyline

oranges and apples ppl oranges and apples

:nyaanyaa:23_02_20087_24PM_0001.jpg calibra

You got annoyed so you had to troll a skyline board??

well duh

this is wonderful! :)

ok ive got a bit of respect for a calibra.... especially in trickedoutvl's case 4wd turbo.. would be a bit of fun im sure but hell ive had two mates with the 2 litre 4 cylender sure it looks good till u drive one properly and bang. then wallet goes bang and then your jaw drops down and goes bang! pricey to fix and the non turbo calibras dont take a hamering....

jack4cars this ones for u buddy! my hack is a vl station wagon with a >>rb20det<<, manual! used to pull a trailer with up to 800 kilo fortnightly and flat foot...(untill 60) :P to this day ive replaced nothing except the oil and filters when performing quality service... it still doesnt blow smoke and runs like a dream.. 3 years later... experience: calibra with 120,000 km previous owner (aged sencible) blew a gasket and 2nd gear in the first week......i wasnt the new owner but a close friend was...

SO dont come on a skyline enthusiast forum bring up a dead thread (3 years old) giving us YOUR personal opinion because we dont want to hear it. :spank:

Edited by jenkies

The cars were crap...4cyl,6,turbo,n/a..designed for hairdressers and stupid suburban housewives, do not be decieved, do not be mistaken!! they're all crap

Major setback is they didn't sell enough locally to have a good supply of used parts available and are now of an age now where Holden won't stock parts anymore under their "12yr" rule.

Big steaming p.o.s in a nutshell.

Speaking from experience as i bought one as a uni run about. Holden Calibras are the worst cars in the f**king planet. Would not touch another one with a 100000 foot pole. People who tell you they are good and to get one are just talking shit to suck you into a money pit. Go read on the calibra forums, almost ALL of their cars have broken in some sort of way. The engine is shit, the interior is shit, hell the whole car is shit. All within a couple of weeks when i had one. Cracked head = low oil pressure, Handbrake wouldn't work. Brake lights stopped working. Sunroof wouldn't open because it fell off the tracks. Air con compressor stopped working. AFM shit itself. All this would have cost about $6000 just to repair. In a matter of fact it would be easier to tell you what did work because that list is a lot shorter.

I ended up selling it for $2000 and i was real happy that i even got that for it. I feel sorry for guy that bought it now lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...