Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The idea of a split dump pipe is that there is turbulent gasses coming out of the a) wastegate and B) turbine.

The reason that a split DUMP is poor is because, sure, they are split, but they are only seperate for what, 10cm. Also when the wastegate gas enters back, it enters at a big angle therefore creating more turbulence. This is why a split DUMP is not worth it, if you still using a front pipe. If you are going to do it seperate, get a sinlge DUMP and front pipe.

The less turbulence the better the flow, as its more smooth.

This is why a dump/front in one is perfect, specially when split. The gasses are seperate for a good 1/2m which allows easy exit from the turbine and wastegate. Also, the entry angle back to the pipe is very good, meaning both gasses just "mesh" together and dont create more turbulence.

From this, going off what my friend said in his 200sx, the split DUMP is more restricitive if using seperate front/dump, so he bought a single. The split gives more power down low, with response but is restrictive up top

BOS importing trials show the split pipe (even in single mode dump/front) makes like 15kw move atw overall.

So from that, conclude that split dump/front in one is best overall. More response, better flow, more top end power.

And that is why i bought the SS split dump/front in one...

Hi Talej, emanuelt, AlexCim do you guys have a digital camera? Can you pleasae post up some photos.

1. It makes no sense that the lambda sensor would hit on the exhaust manifold, the lambda sensor is on the top of the dump and exhaust manifold is on the side. The Stagea exhaust manifold, turbo, heat shielding and standard dump are all the same as the R33GTS. So unless BOS has made a one off manufacturing error, there should be absolutely no problem in that area.

2. The floor pan on the Stagea is supposed to be the same pressing as the R33 from the B pillar forwards. So the R33 dump/engine pipe combo should fit the Stagea. This is where some pictures would come in handy. It would be nice to know if we are dealing with a dump pipe manufacturing error or whether there is some difference that we need to be aware off.

Alexcim's comments (or rather his 200SX owning mate's) back up what we have found. The separation of the spinning exhaust from the turbine and the tumbling exhaust from the wastegate needs to be at least 400 mm. This allows time for the spinning to be controlled (eliminated) by the enlarged exhaust pipe and for the tumbling of the wastegate exhaust to be turned into flow. The blending of the two then can occur without creating the turbulance that robs power.

The phenomon of less low end power from a split dump (and more high end power) is totally illogical as the wastegate shouldn't be open, so whether it is a split dump or a combo should make no difference. The only issue could be if the turbine outlet pipe is too small, but if it is too small at lower rpm then it sure as hell is going to be too small at high rpm.

The reverse, more low end power from a split dump (and less high end power) is somewhat more logical. But again only if the turbine exhaust pipe is too small or the wastegate outlet rejoins it too close to the turbine as per above.

Back to the problem at hand, anyone got any pictures of the problems?

:) cheers :(

Its OK,

I have spoken to Micheal at BOS and we have concluded that it is two things

1, because he uses a new manufacturer for the stainless pipes, the flange on the turbo side is not sitting at the correct angle, which made me have to lean the pipe UP (was tilted back) to fit, but because it was hitting the floor, it didnt fit. So he will check the angles on the stainless ones, teh mild ones are ment to be fine.

2, the CES pipes have the o2 on the other side of the pipe to std. What the split pipe does it cause the o2 to sit on an angle so that it touches the heat sheild on the manifold. I have also discussed this and he is putting the o2 on the other wise, so it will sit "upside down". He said that with the split pipe, in most cases its been the o2 coming CLOSE, really close, but not touching. It is to the do with the angle that its welded in, so maybe using a new manufacturer again, some kinks being worked out of the system.

Micheal will release a new revision of the split pipe probably soon i guess. I want to install mine, as my Fujisubo exhaust arrives in... 10 days!

BTW, the catco SS inside cat fits fine with the std plumbing. I just didnt put it in yet because i would rather do it all in 1 go...

We will be fine fellow stagea owners! We will be fine! :)

Its OK,

I have spoken to Micheal at BOS and we have concluded that it is two things

1, because he uses a new manufacturer for the stainless pipes, the flange on the turbo side is not sitting at the correct angle, which made me have to lean the pipe UP (was tilted back) to fit, but because it was hitting the floor, it didnt fit. So he will check the angles on the stainless ones, teh mild ones are ment to be fine.

2, the CES pipes have the o2 on the other side of the pipe to std. What the split pipe does it cause the o2 to sit on an angle so that it touches the heat sheild on the manifold. I have also discussed this and he is putting the o2 on the other wise, so it will sit "upside down". He said that with the split pipe, in most cases its been the o2 coming CLOSE, really close, but not touching. It is to the do with the angle that its welded in, so maybe using a new manufacturer again, some kinks being worked out of the system.

Micheal will release a new revision of the split pipe probably soon i guess. I want to install mine, as my Fujisubo exhaust arrives in... 10 days!

BTW, the catco SS inside cat fits fine with the std plumbing. I just didnt put it in yet because i would rather do it all in 1 go...

We will be fine fellow stagea owners! We will be fine! :)

Sounds good, except you should NEVER put lambda sensors in the exhaust upside down. They get condensation in them and this causes them to fail. Lambda sensors should ALWAYS face downwards.

:( cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

Hmm, I just got a 3" dump/front pipe and 3" hi-flow cat fitted and neither the R34 GTT or R33 Gtst 1 piece dump/front pipes fit, we needed to cut and weld the GTT one (closest fit) to make it sit ok.

Crap..

mmmmmmmm

This is from the Bosch lambda sensor installation manual;

  Do NOT install it below the 3 o'clock or 9 o'clock position. Condensation can form in the exhaust pipe and permanently damage the sensor.

This is from the Microcraft ECU closed loop tuning manual

6) Lambda sensor use and care

Install the sensor in a minimum of 10 deg upward position to avoid the trapping of condensation in it.

I have a few more, but I think you get the drift.

:unsure: cheers :D

Edited by Sydneykid
I'll debate with you SK, whats the topic? :)

You should know I am very selective, I only enter debates that I can't loose. :lol:

Well shouldn't loose, anyway ;)

:) cheers :)

PS; not very many funny faces to choose from on the new forum, got an update planned?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...