Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nice effort 600hp interesting to compare the time slip with mine if you can post it as last year while running 480-490rwhp (not awd hp) managed a 11.33 125mph, so to put down 11.7 at 115mph sounds like an efficient ET for the mph. But does seem it's not running on as well in the top end strip as you might hope ,yet it's get down the first half well to get the efficient ET.

Again Nice work

pete

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

guys my dad was shifting at about 7300rpm when the car revs to 8500rpm this is because we have still not wired up his shift light and with a 4'' exhaust when your doing 2000rpm it sounds like your doing 6000.

at for what sort of mph the car should be good for 125-130mph, this is what jim from CRD says anyway.

the car did a 1.75, 60''foot

as for times, dad said he can easily take another .5 of a second off.

, thats with out any trouble he rekonds.

as for the GT-SS not having much up top.they make peak power at 7500 rpm

if anyone is questioning the GT-SS turbo's i'll let you all know before we go out which should be in two weeks time, and you guys can come and watch.

also it looks like we are putting in an OS six speed sequential so we can really pushh the car.

Cheers Ben

and also i'm no good at computers so i'll write up the whole run sheet a little later.

Thanks guys and yes the OLD MAN said we can all have a drive (his sons that is)once hes done the fastest time he thinks is possible.

Also i don't want to have a drive and then have the box die on me,so i thinki'll wait untill the new box is in before i try to beat him.

Stacey/Paul i heard that you have got a new OS gear set in your car now is this true.

as for the comment on the shift light and tacho. my dad dosen't like looking done when he's going that fast.he is 59.

Also Stacey/Paul/Anyone what is a quick 60'' foot time and what should we be aiming for.

Cheers.BEN

I dream off a 60ft time like that:( My mph was 111-114mph all night long, despite ETs varying from a 12.9 to 14.2, depended if my 60ft was 2.2 or 2.6:(

Take the keys and give them to Fatz or Duncan, want to see if the thing can knock the sled/Zed off top place for Eastern Creek lap times:thumbsup:

11.7 is good for 115mph must have backed off at the top end ????. I've done 11.9@115mph and thats about as good a time as you would get with a 115mph trap that is driving the car to it's full potential . If you have 360kwaw on CRD's dyno in a r33 my guess is something under 125mph and no more which is hell quick for a car that is driven to and from the track in street trim . But hey hopefully you can prove me wrong and go 125mph+ :rofl: .

once we have finished the car as in JUN Plenum,OS sequential,Big Brakes and tuned on C16 we intend on hitting the Track and seeing what times we can get. Yes is would be great to take down a Zed from the No.1 place.is that the UAS Zed.

We intend to one of the quickest Drag, Circuit and driven everyday car in OZ(Thats my dream anyway).

Our goal is a 10.5 with NOS with these turbos.

i know a lot of you will say thats impossible but then again most would not have thought you couldn't get 367AWKW out of GT-SS turbo's.

The response of the turbo's is great so the car should be good on the track.

once we have finished the car as in JUN Plenum,OS sequential,Big Brakes and tuned on C16 we intend on hitting the Track and seeing what times we can get. Yes is would be great to take down a Zed from the No.1 place.is that the UAS Zed.

We intend to one of the quickest Drag, Circuit and driven everyday car in OZ(Thats my dream anyway).

Our goal is a 10.5 with NOS with these turbos.

i know a lot of you will say thats impossible but then again most would not have thought you couldn't get 367AWKW out of GT-SS turbo's.

The response of the turbo's is great so the car should be good on the track.

Hard to set up your suspension to be optimum for circuit, drag and street. My suggestion regarding NOS is to get two bottles. Big ones.

as for suspension its awd, so it'll be a bit stiff all the time and it still should hook up of the line ok.

as for NOS we would put a 100hp shot in to make up some extra mph once we are into 3rd.

Righto then.

Not so much impossible as unrealistic or impractical, or poor return for money invested. You know it would be easier to bolt on a larger turbo and make 450kw+ instead of the plenum, and the gearbox you are talking about is a dog box that requires alot of maintenance (5,000k pulldowns).

But then again anything is do-able...

Guest two.06l
Not so much impossible as unrealistic or impractical, or poor return for money invested. You know it would be easier to bolt on a larger turbo and make 450kw+ instead of the plenum, and the gearbox you are talking about is a dog box that requires alot of maintenance (5,000k pulldowns).  

But then again anything is do-able...

clearly in this build money is not an object. Didn't realise that OS produced a dog engagement sequential transmission. Surely a pfitzner box would be a cheaper and better/stronger option.

OS box is heliquial cut gears so they are not as loud and they don't need as much mantenace.

as for all they other box's on the market,my father wants one which will be a lot quicker to change gears.

as for the larger turbo set up instead of the plenum,out car has got allmost no lag and still pulls.

The car is producing more torque than a R32 with a T88 straped to it,which also was on the same dyno.

Also the price is 16,500au from otomoto.

Guest two.06l
OS box is heliquial cut gears so they are not as loud and they don't need as much mantenace.

as for all they other box's on the market,my father wants one which will be a lot quicker to change gears.

as for the larger turbo set up instead of the plenum,out car has got allmost  no lag and still pulls.

The car is producing more torque than a R32 with a T88 straped to it,which also was on the same dyno.  

Also the price is 16,500au from otomoto.

hope your not comparing it to the abflug car ben....no offence to abflug but...its a dog. 16,500 why not a hollinger can't see why you would spend all that cash and STILL have helical gears which still require synchros.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...