Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all

I'm rebuilding my Bilstein Coilovers for some more serious track work with my 32 GTS T.

I'm looking for information from anyone who has experience or a source regarding best overall track settings for spring rates and alignment settings.

Perhaps a GTS would be set up closer to the specs of a recent 200sx GTP car rather than a GTR Group A

Any sharing of knowledge on this one would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68980-32-gts-t-race-specs/
Share on other sites

Hello all

I'm rebuilding my Bilstein Coilovers for some more serious track work  with my 32 GTS T.

I'm looking for information from anyone who has experience or a source regarding best overall track settings for spring rates and alignment settings.

Perhaps a GTS would be set up closer to the specs of a recent 200sx GTP car rather than a GTR Group A

Any sharing of knowledge on this one would be greatly appreciated.

What tyres are you using?:rofl:

Ooohh im going to like this thread:) I was told there was 3-4 seconds improvement to be gained in better suspension and using my tyres better?!?

I know the Whiteline kit is more for spirited driving then circuit work, but for a 2 min lap, is there really that much improvement to be gained with shocks/springs/geometry etc when running tyres like D01Js.

Good to see an R32 out there getting some stick:)

I am running Dunlop DO1J's, tyre pressure is probulary another thread but due to only getting 9 laps in total for the day over 3 sessions i never really got a chance to play with that. For intrests sake i started with 36psi all round.

I'm very interested to see the set up on a racing 32 as the stock GTR's run heavier rear springs than the front.

I'm pretty sure the king springs in my Bilstein coil overs are rated at 350 pounds front and 200 rear.

I'm not sure if you can make a direct comparison whith a different type of car because of the varying leverage ratios of different suspension designs. But the Keioffice (Drift King's Workshop) S15 silvia runs 9kg front and back for a setup that is suited well to circuits and can go drifting with confidence.

Another S14 on that vid uses 10kg fronts and 8 kg rears.

I raced an R32 GTSt in the Tasmanian Circuit Series last year called the Octagon Series.

The GTSt is a great track car as you can get the weight so slow much easier than a GTR.

I used Bilstien fully adjustable coilovers that Quadrant build from GTR shocks, these were set to they're recommendations that are on file if you call them. Its the standard GTSt track kit they can supply. The best thing to do is have the top arms in the front cut and shut to get atleast 5 degrees neg on the front, put a whiteline two stage anti-roll bar on the front and set it to the hardest, install a front strut brace and lock the diff up. I ran RE55s on R32 16" GTR rims so we could drop the ride height and they worked a treat.

The competition ready weight of the car was just on 1200kg. I ran a very mild mods, steel wheel turbo on 18psi, afm intercooler with waterspray, unichip and 3" t/b that produced 199kWs at the treads on a Dynologic.

Do cars with wishbone front ends need to run such excessive front end camber? I know circuit cars based on Macpherson struts erun wild amounts of camber, but wishbone cars seem to run less? Any truth or substance to that observastion?

Also with that much camber, under brakes did you find that stopping distances were effected? The inside of the tyres must get pretty damn hot?

I agree with the sway bars, i tightened mine up the other day and car feels much better, will see how the go this weekend at Phillip Island and Sandown...i may put them back to soft for Sandown...will just see how i go

I am running Dunlop DO1J's, tyre pressure is probulary another thread but due to only getting 9 laps in total for the day over 3 sessions i never really got a chance to play with that. For intrests sake i started with 36psi all round.

I'm very interested to see the set up on a racing 32 as the stock GTR's run heavier rear springs than the front.

I'm pretty sure the king springs in my Bilstein coil overs are rated at 350 pounds front and 200 rear.

I'm not sure if you can make a direct comparison whith a different type of car because of the varying leverage ratios of different suspension designs. But the Keioffice (Drift King's Workshop) S15 silvia runs 9kg front and back for a setup that is suited well to circuits and can go drifting with confidence.

Another S14 on that vid uses 10kg fronts and 8 kg rears.

There is another thread going on front camber settings. So pop over and have a read of it as well.

Let me start off this one with my methodology.

The job of a spring is to hold the car up and allow sufficient compliance for riding the bumps. I like to run as soft a spring rate as I can, this means the tyres are in contact with the road as much as possible. As the spring rate goes up the tyres tend to skip over the small bumps and ridges, this reduces traction.

The main job of the shocks is to control the springs, prevent them oscillating after they have been compressed by a bump. Shocks also have to control the stabiliser bars, they are a spring as well. With the sophisticated valving available these days we can also use the shocks to control the chassis movement, lessen the roll squat and dive. This means we can use even softer springs to ride the bumps and hop the ripple strips, which on many circuits is essential for good lap times.

I use stabiliser bars to control the roll, adjustable to alter the balance. They are simply the most effective method, that's why circuit race cars (all the way to F1) have ****pit adjustable bars.

The front suspension geometry is set up for anti dive under brakes, this limits the weight transfer so the rear brakes can help the front brakes.

The rear suspension geometry is set up for a little anti squat, otherwise you get excessive front end lift under power on corner exits (understeer).

The wheel alignment settings are based on maximising the tyre contact patch, the more of the tyre on the road, the more traction. I set that up using a tyre pyrometer, with the aim of equalising the tyre temperatures across the tread. Tyre pressure also have a role to play in this, if the tyre pressure is too low the centre of the tread will not have the same temperature as the outsides. This is because it will not have as much contract with the road. Vice versa for too high a pressure.

The Japanese have a tendency to try and do all of the above with the spring, so they end up with ridiculously high spring rates. They do not have our European based culture of using stabiliser bars, they didn't have a KMac or a Selbys. Plus Japanese circuits are very flat, not at all bumpy like we have here. It is also worth remembering that good Japanese mechanics charge like brain surgeons, so a bolt on solution is much cheaper to install.

Keeping that in mind, let's get specific with a GTST. The rear spring rate needs to be low enough to provide a bit of squat under acceleration, weight transfer to the rear helps the traction. Around 200 lbs is not a bad place to start, hardly ever going over 250 lbs. The front spring rate is determined by "what the tyre likes", some tyres (slicks) need a high spring rate, others (road tyres) need a low spring rate, the "R" compound tyres need something in between. Around 350 lbs is not a bad place to start for a front spring rate.

Front stabiliser bar on front engine, rear wheel drive car is of necessity pretty big. I use a 27 mm adjustable on GTST's. The rear anti roll is tricky, too high a rate and power oversteer becomes an issue. I use a 22 mm adjustable in the wet or on slippery circuits, 24 mm adjustable in the dry on grippy circuits.

Sub frame bushes on the rear are essential for a limited amount of squat, and the HICAS is not your friend, remove it. I run a small amount of toe in on the rear, 1 or 2 mm each side. Camber is not excessive other wise you loose traction under acceleration, between 1 and 2 degrees negative usually gives the best tyre temperatures.

As much caster on the front as you can get, usually 6 to 7 degrees before the tyres start hitting the front of the guards. Front camber, is again determined by the tyre temperatures. I have yet to find a circuit anywhere in Australia where I need to run more than 4 degrees. If I ever do, it will be because the spring, anti roll and shock rates are too low. So I will go up in spring rate or bar size and adjust the shocks rather than use more camber, the car will be faster that way.

That's about it for me, it's racing season and we have 3 meetings in 2 states in 4 weeks, so work beckons. Hope it was of some help.:(

PS; Tyre pressures are totally dependant on the tyres you use, different brands, different sizes and different compounds require different pressures. For Yokohama 032R’s (the Improved Production Control Tyre) and 048R’s (the Production Car Control Tyre) a hot pressure in the mid 30’s (34 to 36) is what the manufacturer recommends. I would start their and see what the tyre temperatures tell you.

The camber certainly improved handling and general tyre wear (completely flat wear). The owner of the car and I don't really understand he technical side of suspension apart from the fundametals, so top tarmac rally driver Jason White set up the car similar to his teams 300ZX TT circuit car.

Found braking was not effected by the camber and the vehicle is not fitted with ABS. It still retains standard calipers, Pagid pads and standard size DBA slotted rotors fed cold air by 3" neo ducting right into the veins.

I've now bought an R32 GT-R V Spec 2 to go racing.

Haven't used Dunlop's before, but in the Bridgstone RE540s and RE55s, 35 cold would be too high at any time. We start the RE55s at 30-32psi depending on track temp. I used RE55s the GTR on the weekend in a hillclimb that was very wet and dropped them back to 27psi with excellent results... bet everyone with a 3 second gap to 2nd!

Down here we approx 45 race laps a day + free practice in the morning + quailfying.

Races range between 5 and 15 laps. The 15 lappers usually have a compulsory pitstop where a velco sash has to be removed by an official and the standard 40 speed limit applies in pitland as usual.

That's great information guys, thanks heaps.

I will post up the mods that i make to the current set up and the results from Oran Park supersprint which is in a couple of weeks.

I believe the rear end definately loses accelerative traction from exessive neg camber. After having the car set up with about 1.5 neg on the front and zero on the rear i now have 3.5 neg on the front with 2.25 neg on the rear. Combined with 3mm toe out on the front and 2mm two out on the rear it is no wonder the car was struggling to get power down and trying to swap ends even in third gear on turns 3 , 4 , 5 & 11 at EC.

The toe out on the rear is suppossed to reduce power over steer. When power is applied the wheel will move forward and reduce the toe out. If you start with toe in the tyre moves further forward under acceleration and apparently break traction quicker because it has a greater lateral angle through the corner. (so i have been told )

It would make more sense so me to use tow in on the rear to prevent the back of the car trying to turn around the front which is what mine wants to do rather then keeping the back of the car tight pushing it towards the inside of the corner.

Alternate theories ??????

My sway bars are standard too, so i don't know where that leaves me but looking at photos of the car from the EC supersprint, you can see the excessive weight transfer to the front out side corner on corner entry. The rear inside wheel is nearly completely unloaded. That also squares up the front tyre and all but eliminates the 3.5 degrees neg camber.

Keep the info coming in i hope it's benificial to lots of members.

  • 2 weeks later...

Going in today to adjust rear settings.

Taking the camber from -2.25 to around -.5

Changing the toe from 2mm toe out to 2mm toe in.

After Oran Park on Sunday, the next thing we'll change is the coils and valving.

The current coils are variable rate which i forgot to mention so there gotta go. Next test will be at Wakefield then after that i can do back to back test at Wakefield trying different things like swaybars etc.

The plan is to do one mod at a time and record times and feel. I'll keep data on this thread for others.

First off thanks for the info SK i had my car around at bridgestone just today.

For what its worth i have recently installed new coilovers and whiteline adjustable swaybars.

Settings were:

front

camber around 1.8 neg

caster around 5.8

toe: .3 total .6 in

rear

camber around 1.8 neg

toe: .2mm total .4mm in

I will be intalling whitline front camber/caster, rear camber kit and rear subfame shit, lol, as soon as i get time.

At this point i figure when i install these kits i will set them (the eccentric tubes or whatever) to change the setting(ie front camber) as much as possible in the desired direction(ie closest to .5 neg). And so on.

Another problem im seeing is possibly say for example when i press in the new castor rod bushes, then press the eccentric/metal tubes into them; will i beable to adjust them???? the fit to me looks pretty tight

I dont think i will run different caster side to side as SK has said is benificial, and i think i will adjust the coilovers untill the heights are even side to side. Atm i have set the heights very briefly(15 min) thats why i have aprrox values above as these values change slighly depending on the height you set.

Any advice would be appreciated, cough, SK :)

Cheers all hope that made some sense its late

Well my rear tyres yesterday were the same temp across the face of the tyre, so i figure that means the rear susp geometry is spot on. But my fronts are 12-15deg C higher on the outside edge then on the inside, so i guess that means i need more camber or need to so something about the body roll?!?!?!...

But ill have a closer look once i get my new shocks...looking to get some DMS 50mm adjustable shocks...so fingers crossed that will make the car a little more balanced, the Whiteline kit is awesome on the street, and fun and neutral on the track, but would like to get something a little more suited to track work:)

Too much bodyroll:( With road tyres....

462Eastern_Creek_Turn2_Exit_Closeup.jpg

A...and even worse with the semis...

247149200020.jpg

Yeh, thats my car at the top so its got all the fluff that Whiteline sell for the R32 GTST, thats part of the reason i was wanting to get the Group 4s:) So have got the 24mm adjustable front and 22mm adjustable rear set to the stiffest

http://www.whiteline.com.au/docs/fact_shee...line_R32GTS.PDF

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
×
×
  • Create New...