Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I just had my car tuned at Hills (awesome tuner btw - thanks to all who recommended them) and got 177rwkw, which I'm damn pleased with. I'd like to know what my torque is though, but the car was dyno'd in 3rd and is giving me insane numbers. I think I saw a thread on this a while back but noone actually said how you can convert the number to the real torque.

Anyway, you can get my dyno sheet at www.ozemail.com.au/~caddies

Anyone know?

I'm sure it's got something to do with the 1.3:1 gearing on 3rd, but dividing by 1.3 certainly isn't giving me correct numbers.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm still interested in figuring out the flywheel torque too :(

Out of interest what mods have you got and what boost are you running? My intercooler plumbing is killing my power, I'm going to get that sorted early next year. Every mechanic that sees the way the pipes are hooked up with right-angle bends gives me a worse reaction and a bigger speech on how crap it is. Mark's was the worst :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104004
Share on other sites

OK I think I have nailed it. I think the answer to your original question is that your dyno is showing 2.33 times the flywheel torque after losses(I will explain what I mean by that later). I don't know why it's 2.33 but I will explain how I got there.

Firstly the I have used ratios from here which I think are correct. My car redlines at about 100km/h in second so I know the first one I had was wrong. So using this your max power at 129km/h is 6157 engine RPM, which seems fair. At this speed your wheels are doing 1084 RPM. Now given that kw=NmxRPM/9551, that means with 177kW the torque at the wheels is 1559.7Nm at the wheels. Thats impresive.

So I think what the dyno operators do when they set it to display torque at the wheels is reflect this back to the flywheel. eg. Torque=Nm@wheels/(Gear Ratio X Final Ratio). That would give you 274.56Nm at your peak power (you get the same figure if

you put 177 and 6157 into the Nm=kwx9551/RPM formula where RPM is engine RPM). This again seems fair because the torque at peak power at the fly with stock 184kw@6400RPM is 274.59Nm. So you are making about the same torque at the wheels as a stocker at the fly, but slightly less power at the wheels than stock fly power due to the fact your peak is at slightly less RPM.

Here is the spreadsheet with the right gearing. You can put in you tyre stuff, different speeds and power to find torque.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104406
Share on other sites

OK, here's a full list of my performance mods -

* HKS Type S FMIC

* HKS Cam Slide Pulley on the exhaust camshaft - 2 degress retarded

* Trust Airinx Pod Filter

* 3" front/dump combo pipe with a separate wastegate line, all HPC coated.

* Fujitsubo twin 3.5" catback exhaust

* Apexi Super AFC

* GFB Bleed valve (14psi)

* GFB Hybrid BOV (not really a performance mod, but it could affect how the car runs I suppose)

I think that's it.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104454
Share on other sites

b2barker,

That all makes a lot of sense. I am glad we finally got this all sorted out. I might copy and edit my dynosheet's Torque scale on the left to reflect what it should be. After all, even if I get it slightly wrong, I'll at least be closer to what it should be.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/6907-torque-multiplier/#findComment-104457
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah yes, but the part in my hand was actually painted and fitted by me! I knew any front lip was likely to be sacrificial but I've had to fix it twice already... by the time I buy a fibreglass fixing kit, sort out sandpaper blocks, buy some fibreglass filler, body bog, spend the time and effort for a 'Greg' result... a new one being $290 seems like it's the better way to go and spray that with bedliner/raptor coat and we're all pretty again.. Would have preferred it last more than a month though. Them's the breaks I suppose.
    • I find it funny that the USA is finding out all this really really weird stuff, and people from the USA are coming here treating it like gospel, yet, all the info on solving those issues is here on these forums for the last 15 odd years... Also, I know how much heat it takes to ignite the hood lining of an R33 skyline. I worked it out myself... It also took a LOT of time, and heat for it to do it... Big single, and I needed to drive the car, so retarded the timing off to "protect it". Yeah, that was a bad move for cruising on a freeway with only 15 degrees of timing on it. That was a lesson I learned around 2009. So that's over 15 odd years ago. Aligning water and oil, that's identical for any turbo engine, it's not Japanese specific. If a shop doesn't know how to make sure the core is rotated the right way, then they shouldn't be touching any turbo engine. That's not a matter of "We haven't had Skylines for that long here"...
    • Sounds like it is rotational in the driveline. CV? Tailshaft CB? Also.....didn't you just pay to have that bit painted and put on the car?
    • Yeah, when I dialled my idle down, given how much time I spent idling at the lights in traffic on my daily commute, the effect on overall fuel consumption was absolutely noticeable.
    • Emissions, fuel consumption, heat, noise, etc. most likely.
×
×
  • Create New...