Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats everyones view on the best way to get a High HP rwd car down the strip, doing it the hard way and sticking to manual box and radial tyres, im using BF Goodrich Comp T/A's.

I have a set of Bilstein shocks and some unknown springs and a set of stock shocks and springs now, and fully adjustable arms all round. Im tring to find the best comprimise on the rear between getting enough squat for increased traction and not to much so that the rear camber changes too much. On the front just aiming for some lift so we get weight transfer to the rear.

Ill be looking to get the bilsteins re valved for changes in bump and rebound and getting some springs made up. How much do the shocks affect the stiffnes on the bump and how much is affected by the spring rates ?

Also what afftect will sway bars have? i have whiteline bars on but my thoght was seeing we are going in a stright line and wont both the left and right sides to behave the same they will have little affect and if i remove them it may transfew to much to one side only and give major camber changes on that side where it would be under the most load.

Any ideas appreciated and what others have found through trying different things, cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69161-rwd-drag-suspension-settings/
Share on other sites

I still need help here please

Looking at getting some HR coilovers that have damping adjustment and then getting some different springs made with softer rate to fine tune the set up, will the shocks have suitable adjustment for drag work when using softer springs? The sprigs supplied are front 8 kg/mm and rear 6 kg/mm, so would get two different softer rear springs to start and go from there, any opinions

I've also got the same questions. I've bought a full set of stock suspension to use instead of my coilovers and have all adjustable suspension arms. Plan on using Comp T/As, Yoko A048s or MT radials.

AFAIK its not wise to change the spring rates in aftermarket coilovers as the coilover is calibrated for that stiffness (i'm sure someone can explain better). You're better off getting your stock suspension redone to 90/10 front and 10/90 rears.

Ok thanks look the goods are they any better then the BF comp T/As but, they appear to be a very sticky tyre and certainly fill the guards with lots off rubber from my small burnouts but i can spin then up so easy.

What setup do you have slapper and any qtr times?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
×
×
  • Create New...