Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday all,

A real quickie here, just wondering if anyone knows what power an RB20DET, pref out of an R32 GTST, makes at the wheels - when she's completely STOCK STANDARD...

I've just the below mods done to my baby and she now puts out a tidy 166.3 rwkw running 1.0 bar boost. :(

Apexi power FC

Greddy Profec B elec boost cont.

3" turbo back exhaust (catco hi-flo cat & dump pipe, X-force cannon muffler)

600x300x76 FMIC with full custom plumbing

HKS pod filter in FL guard - best cold air intake i've ever seen!

Sard adj fuel pressure regulator

Walbro 550hp 250 lph in-tank fuel pump

stock injectors - about 80% duty cycle i think...

Unfortunatley I didn't get the chance to dyno it beforehand so i'm interested to find out what the power difference is. I'm guestimating they make around 100 - 110 rwkw but if anyone's actually dynoed a stocker, i'd love to here what they really make!

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69509-atw-power-for-a-stock-rb20det/
Share on other sites

Why such low power figures?

Is your car 1989, or does it have a series 1 rb20 in it??

Those mods should see atleast 180rwkw, if not more...

Stock standard ive seen one dyno at 104rwkw to help you out!

Yeah the bloke at Unique Auto Sports says those mods should see 170 - 180 rwkw, but then he said that i am only running 14psi plus its a stock turbo...hmmm. I've got to back and see him for a few tuning tweaks and i need to double check the injectors so i'll see if there's any difference then...

104rwkw - cheers!

Ye... you could run 1 bar (0.7psi more) but wud of thought u wud of got more.

Maybe u have a series 1 turbo, these are a fair bit weaker and have different inlet manifolds too!

No stress... bigger turbo time :( Esp with those supportin mods!

Ye... you could run 1 bar (0.7psi more) but wud of thought u wud of got more.

Maybe u have a series 1 turbo, these are a fair bit weaker and have different inlet manifolds too!

No stress... bigger turbo time :( Esp with those supportin mods!

Why would you have thought he would make more power?

As for different manifolds and differences in turbos, Series I and Seies II R32s :confused:

From what i would have gathered, 166rwkws is on the money:)

Meant engines dude! Not the actual car... lol

From what ive seen those mods WITHOUT a power FC can make up to 250rwhp... hes got that ontop..

Im yet to see a std turbo R32 GTST make 250rwhp, big thing with the Pfc is that the power curve/tractability of the engine should be improved...the turbo can only flow what it can flow, but the Pfc can help improve mixtures and response.

Another thing, i dont know how true this is as its just an observation, but the R32 ECUs appear to be far more flexible then the later R33s which insist on doing silly things with fuelling and ignition when you wind up the boost with a few breathing mods.

The R32 on the other hand does a pretty good job of adjusting to the new airflow requirements of the engine....

lol...That said, does the car drive any different with the tuned PFC now:)

Bigger turbo time = nothing makes me more moist!!!! :aroused:

in time an HKS GT RS will grace my exhaust manifold...

mines a 1992 build so its definitely a series 2 engine & turbo...very odd that the power figures are less than what others are gettin with similar / less mods

also i am running quite wide rear wheels & tyres - 9" wheels, 255 tyres - would that affect dyno figures?

Ye... you could run 1 bar (0.7psi more) but wud of thought u wud of got more.

Maybe u have a series 1 turbo, these are a fair bit weaker and have different inlet manifolds too!

No stress... bigger turbo time :P Esp with those supportin mods!

I had mine when it was bog stock standard on 2 different dyno dynamic dyno's.

D&T Performance - 113rwkw (hot day 98RON BP Ultimate)

RPM Performance - 115rwkw (cool day, 95RON BP Premium)

Check out some of the dyno run scans on the D&T Performance website.

It gives you an idea how the stocker rb compares to the ls1's, 200sx's etc.

I later had mine on the RPM Performance dyno, ran 1bar with a FMIC, 3" Turbo back exhaust, a little bit of extra ignition timing and fuel leaned out slightly via fuel reg modification. It made 164rwkw.

Why such low power figures?

Is your car 1989, or does it have a series 1 rb20 in it??

Those mods should see atleast 180rwkw, if not more...

Stock standard ive seen one dyno at 104rwkw to help you out!

A turbo can only flow so much air before it begins dropping efficiency.

This is why RB20 turbo's tend to drop boost UNLESS you run a good ebc that can vary the duty cycle at higher rpm. (AVCR or Blitz SBC-ID)

With 1bar holding to the redline it should be up around 170rwkw, and maaaybe 175rwkw if its a cool day. It all depends on the tune, how rich it is running and how agressive the tune is (ignition timing)

this is strange my car with front mount. 12PSI and zaust has 141 KW at the wheels. i am sure u should get more then 166KW. maybe something worng with his dyno. The Power FC should atleast give u 20 - 30 KW on its own

i just wish ppl would stop comparing their dyno results to someone who has dyno'd their car on a different dyno in a different state. workshops can make a dyno read as high or low as they want it to. run it down the strip, at least that gives you a better indication of how quick your car is imo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...