Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

12.5psi & exhaust mine made 152rwkw with a little lean out via the fuel pressure reg.

Prior to the lean out it made ~140rwkw also.

Going from 12.5psi to 15psi didn't gain much. Only another 12rwkw. :P

Turbo's out of efficiency.

Bretto,

You are correct but dyno's do give a rough idea of the power it is making, especially if you have a base (stock) figure to work from.

I'm amazed at the different power figures everyone is getting off different dynos with different mods - its incredible!!! I might have to try a different dyno with a different tune and see what happens.

sxygtst - the power FC I've actually had in for a while now and on it's own, it made stuff all difference - even with a good tune. When you start doin other stuff, that's when the power FC really starts to make a difference over a stock ECU.

Bretto - you're absolutely right mate, I reckon a run down WSID will tell the whole story!!!

rednut,

What do you consider a really good tune? Was it done with the same tuner as previous tunes?

Different tuners lean on motors a little harder, spend a little more time getting the ignition timing near its limit. This is what makes good power or depending how carefull they are a broken motor. :P

Back in the Martin donnon days with Tilbrooks and their remaped ecu's the rb20det's used to run 1bar then drop back to ~13psi (nasty bleeders) by redline. ~13psi used to make around 170rwkw on their dyno.

rednut,

 

What do you consider a really good tune? Was it done with the same tuner as previous tunes?

 

Different tuners lean on motors a little harder, spend a little more time getting the ignition timing near its limit. This is what makes good power or depending how carefull they are a broken motor. :D

 

Back in the Martin donnon days with Tilbrooks and their remaped ecu's the rb20det's used to run 1bar then drop back to ~13psi (nasty bleeders) by redline. ~13psi used to make around 170rwkw on their dyno.

Thats just it mate - what is a good tune? I guess it depends on the tuner themselves and what you want it for. When I first got the power FC i took it to a guy in Sydney called Hitman, who is a gun tuner, but he mainly does rotary drag cars. I couldn't tell much difference then but my mate took his s6 RX7 there also and driving the rx7 after the tune, it would certainly be a handful on the track but the straight line speed is incredible. So once I got all this other work done, I took it to Unique Auto Sports instead, who specialise in Nissans. The bloke spent a couple of hours on the dyno then went for a short drive - a short time comparitively to re-tune a car. I guess the things i've learnt here is that tuning takes time to get it right for what you want and that a few tuning tweaks are needed.

all i was trying to say sxygtst is that two different workshop dynos will almost definitely read differently. i have seen between two different workshops in brisbane a 35rwkw difference on an na car. so if your saying his is to low and he should be making an extra 10 - 15rwkw then its very possible that on another dyno he would easily make that. also different tuners will tune cars in different ways. depending on what the car is being tuned for there can be a significant difference in max power figures.

RB20s are completely different aninmals to RB25s.

On an RB25 you throw on some cam gears and make way more power. On an RB20 you dont get the same gain:(

Std RB25 ECUs suck, throw on some breathing mods and wind boost up and the ECUs does silly things with fuel and ignition. So once again a Power FC can make a big difference.

Now on an RB20, throw as many breathing mods as you like on your car, wind boost up to 14 psi and the thing will run pretty damn well. The ECU is much more flexible then the RB25ECU.

As for dyno figures...meh, ive discovered drag racing and i reckon mph is a more reliable way of comparing power...still nto fool proof , but better then this to that dyno.;)

So no real difference between the two tunes when driving?

Sorry dude - don't think I was quite clear...

Stock + Power FC = bugger all difference - a bit more responsive so I guess a few rwkw gain but hardly noticeble...

All mods I listed on first post = 166.3 rwkw and HEAPS of difference...

And that's just it, it feels faster than 166.3 rwkw - I can now easily keep up with my mates s6 rx7 which has 188 rwkw - yeah I know rotaries and RB's are like apples and oranges but then all the debate over dynos and shit is kinda proving to me that the drag strip is the best "real world" way to guage performance improvements. Watch this space for a time slip :)

ahh yes.. My misunderstanding.. :)

It would be nice to see a dyno graph scan. :)

166rwkw is where the turbo is fairly maxed out. Airflow is airflow and a turbo can only supply so much of it.

Mid range is where gains can be had, which is what you stated. ;)

I really would like to see the dyno graph scan as I have mine here making 164rwkw on 1bar with the stock ecu.

At 164rwkw it appeared to flatten out a little in the lower of mid range.

Roy - yeah i've heard RB25 ecu's are basically a paperweight once you start modifying them. And i'm subscribed to the "top RB20 club..." thread also and it seems you're having heaps of success by running yours down Calder and adjusting / tweaking stuff from there...definitely sounds like the way to go :)

Cubes - once i can be arsed to get to my mates place i'll definitely put up the dyno graph - and your exactly right, mid range is where all the fun (read:gain!) is, there's a massive power lump right up to about 6000 rpm and then it drops. And that's how I drive it now, short shifting!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...