Jump to content
SAU Community

Gear Ratios for R33 GTST?


Recommended Posts

out of interest, the final drive ratio is on the jap chassis plate.

down the bottom:

i.e.

RC43 = 4.3:1

RC41 = 4.1:1

Hope this helps.

out of interest - see below:

Transmissions:

RE4R01A 4 speed auto

RE4R07A 4 speed auto

RE5R01A 5 speed auto

FS5R30A 5 speed manual

FS5W7 5 speed manual GTS

:(

OK, so next question, how to you turn ratios into revs/km/h?

In the R33 manual I have I have the km/hr for auto and manual ... can't remember off the top of my head, but for 1st its something like 55km/hr for manual, but of course that's just the recommended.

If you are really keen I can type them in for auto and manual for u.

Looks like Gizmo already beat me too it!

I wouldn't say they are like redline figures because they're recommended safe limits, probably around 5000rpm. Probably add another 20k/hr in each gear for true redline figures.

Get a speed cut n Nismo's 320km speedo, to get figures for redline speed on 5th gear...

That is if anyone is brave enough to try....

Disclaimer: I do not encourage excessive driving speed nor

dangerous behaviour on public street.

Originally posted by gizmo

As predator666 said from the manual

Shift Lever (Manual Shift)

Check the table on maximum speeds in each gear from 1~4

(Shift to the next gear up well within these speed ranges)

Shift Lever Position    RB20    RB25DE     RB25DET

1                                50        50              55  

2                                85        80              100

3                                135      135            145

4                                165      175            180

Originally posted by gizmo

Shift Lever Position    RB20    RB25DE     RB25DET

1                                50        50              55  

2                                85        80              100

3                                135      135            145

4                                165      175            180

Thanks Gizmo.

I figured 7000 in 4th was about 180. I don't know about everyone else's speedo, but its about 210 on mine, so my speedo is 17% optimistic!

And meggala, I reakon it would take a hell of a long private road to get a GTS-T to 270:eek:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...