Jump to content
SAU Community

What speed do you use 5th gear ?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I try not to shift gear at 3000 too often, any more is abit ouchie for the engine i think. Most of the time in good trafic condition I rev to 2500 then shift.

hehe, i think your missing all the fun, rb25 is quite capable of handling double theses revs happily :headspin: .

very rarely do i shift at anything less than 2.5k, unless in traffic.

does that make me a hoon?? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use 3rd around town, only really get into fifth once I'm on a highway or something... I can't imagine using 5th in my car around town would be very punchy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, I stay in 5th gear at any speed I want, even if its 50kph. It dosent take that much to keep your speed on the flats.

If I want more torque, I use the clutch and shift gears to whatever gear is appropriate (ie 4th or 3rd). When I'm done though it always goes back to 5th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u guys are either petrol conservative or grannys in the making :P

You should never labor your car in high gear be that 2nd ,3rd th or 5th under 1500-2000rpm. I shift Up to 3000-3300rpm and change every gear unless my car is cold. Also 5th gear doesnt come into effect till im at LEAST 80KPH and drop bak to 4th till im at 60 KPH and into 3rd . :( call me a lead foot but thats just me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you guys need to get some RB30ET torque up ya :(

When i'm in the mood I regularly just trundle around my suburb etc in 5th which is from around 50kmh.

I also quite regularly skip gears ie Only use 1st 2nd 4th.

Hope soon to come RB26DETT has some useableable down low torque, as I'm becoming quite fond of it :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granny Driving...

revs stay at 2000rpm when cruising, drop down when below and shift up at 3000

3rd - 40kph - 60kph

4th - 60kph - 80kph

5th - 80kph or greater

Normal driving...

a tad different.... the 2000 rpm cruise rule is kept, but gears become...

3rd - 40:D

One thing to remember is that you want yr rpm to be such that if you change down you end up in the meaty rev range, this means that dropping a gear and hammering is always an option and you'll avoid bogging the turbo down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...