Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I recently bought a buggered RB25 turbo and thinking of Hi-Flowing it.

I've heard mixed feelings about this from one or two people, however I'd

like an opinion from people who have done this before and have some results

to prove.

My current mods are FMIC, pod filter, Bleed Valve, BOV, 3" turbo-back exhaust.

From my own knowledge after bolting on a hi-flow I think it will be necessary to get an Apexi Power FC (or at a minimum an SAFC), probably a Z32 air flow meter and bigger fuel pump and possibly bigger injectors.

Does that sound about right?

I aim for around 250rwkw but with a reliable set up that won't go KABOOM on me.

From peoples experience, is it possible to easily obtain 250rwkw with a hi-flow RB25 turbo?

And if it can reach 250rwkw, what other mods would I need to build up to around 300rwkw?

I'm thinking about getting a HKS actuator over the standard, would this benefit in gaining the power I'm aiming for?

Thanks for your help..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70224-hi-flow-turbo-rb25det/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you will not be able to reach close to 250rwkw with a hi flowed standard turbo, you will need something bigger, such as a gtrs or a 2540

and yes you should get a power fc otherwise its a bit of a waste (power and petrol)

first thing you should get is a power fc

powerfc, injectors, z32, clutch, fuel pump, electronic boost controller, 3" dump, front, hiflow cat, fmic, hiflow

should get you 250rwkw on 1.3 bar. if you wanted 300rwkw then gt30 ext gate and tomei cams

I think you'll be pushing the standard high flow turbo pretty hard if your aiming for 250rwkw its doable, just how long do you want the turbo to last is the question. Definitely need to tune a/f ratios and timing aswell.

300rwkw (400hp) is alot of power for a standard RB25DET, so after youve done all the support systems ie fuel system, computer,suspension etc youll have to get the internals done $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Which isnt cheap. Then you might want to upgrade those brakes.

I reckon aim for around 220rwkw with the highflow and the pfc, this should be safe and reliable.

Just my opinion ;)

I have seen all the reviews on the forum about the hiflows being great and people getting 250rwkw + but every tuner i have spoken to has told me to stay clear of them if i wanted any more than about 220rwkw... i guess it depends on who you listen to at the end of the day.

I was really keen to go for a standard hiflow but have decided to go HKS from what i have been told.

i would agree with LANFOH that around 220rwkw would be around the mark.

Blade, what sort of power have you got from yours and what other mods?

Gcg stage1

straight through, no cat

fmic

pump

z32

550 injectors

cams

ebc

powerfc

i clocked without injectors and z32afm at around 13-14psi 200rwkw

and now with injectors and afm its running around 18 psi with 248rwkw on a tight arse dyno, the engine is knocking a bit in diff temps might have to fix up timing etc.

this arvo in 3rd gear at 6800rpm it knocked to about 81 which isnt too good.

People seem to quote pretty massive power figures on here, for example an RB20 pulling 200rwkws on its standard turbo, with a fmic and thats more or less it... even though you run out of spark after 13ish psi..... I've got a hi flow and all the usual backup stuff, and have just managed 200kws out of it....

But the hiflow has great response, and seems to get along great.. RB25 would crack with one I'd reakon...

People seem to quote pretty massive power figures on here, for example an RB20 pulling 200rwkws on its standard turbo, with a fmic and thats more or less it... even though you run out of spark after 13ish psi.....  I've got a hi flow and all the usual backup stuff, and have just managed 200kws out of it....  

But the hiflow has great response, and seems to get along great.. RB25 would crack with one I'd reakon...

mine hasnt cracked and it wont hopefully crack. however i cant go any higher cause its at its maximum potential

I guess he means the exhaust wheel due to excess heat from the mount of air being compressed. Sydneykid has a few cars with rb25 hiflows and gets 250rwkw with tomei cams and they drive the cars all the time. A hks 2540 would be a waste of money, its a proven mismatch and makes excess lag. Pick of the bunch for rb25det is hiflow should get around 220rwkw without cams or 250rwkw with cams and good tune or hks gt-rs should do 260rwkw without cams (im pretty sure).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you do go with drain back, make sure everything is foam or wool filled so it actually does something, and ensure there is a screen somewhere in the drain to catch anything that comes loose from the packing. I don't drain back
    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...