Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks mate. Can you do this before or after you start the car. I see 15 deg is the standard.

I'm not really sure which wire I need to put the timing light pulse detector bit on.

I have the manual and had a look. It said somewherenear the plug on te top of the engine..I read a few posts and I think they said that one should be 30 deg. I'll have to try it.

Cheers

When you set the timing make sure its up to full operating temp.

Disconnect the TPS with the car off, just to be safe.

Make sure the idle is @ approx 650rpm to set the timing.

Timing should be at 15deg btdc (middle mark)

Don't advance it to much over the factory, its already tuned for high octane jap fuel.

At the back of the head there is a white wire in a loop, just near the coil pack plastic connector. This is the wire to use for the timing light.

I've typically found that with alot of timing guns, this wire, allows the light to pick up all pulses, therfore not giving a light as it should from cylinder 1.

I usually have to use an old ignition lead between the coil and the spark plug to attach the timing light too.

Hey there - thanks for the reply. I don't really understand what you mean about an old lead between coil and spark plug. Do you have to pull the centre cover off to do this. All cars I've done this on have haed a distibutor i.e. no indiidual coil packs.

Thanks

Yeah connect your timing light clamp around the loop wire first and see it work succesfully.

If it doesn't work with your timing light, the only way you will get it to work, is remove the plastic coil cover (in between the cam covers), remove coil on cylinder one and use a normal spark plug lead (like on a dizzy car) to connect from the spark plug to the coil.

All this lead does is allow you to hook your timing light clamp around it, so it gets the correct signal to fire the timing light.

Hope that make sense?

It will make sense when you realise that stupid loop at the rear of the head doesn't work properly :)

Thanks a heap mate. So does the fitting on the coil have a similar fitting like it would coming off a distributor . I would have thought there would be an electical lead to the coil and the coil sits on the spark plut so the fitting on the bottom of the coil will only suit sitting on top of a sparky. Or is there a short lead from coil to sparky. I'll open the workshop manual maybe I'll understand better then :) instead of bugging you guys.

Thanks

Not really, i had to modify a lead to suit the application really, but now i have it, i can rip the coil off and use the lead to get my timing light working anytime i have too.

You will suss it all out im sure. With a bit of luck your light will work connected to the factory loop, but if it doesn't you know where to head.

Catchya...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...