Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys my mate just bought an R34 non turbo with the idea of putting a big combo into it and making big power.(up to 450wrkw).

I suggested useing the RB 30 bottom end and using the GTR head.he has heard of putting the neo head on!

as for turbo/s (he wants an external wastegate).I would use a set of 2835's as he wants to use the car for circut work as well.i would think that with the 3L and the work done to the engine it should come onto boost around 4500 i would think mayby sooner.

any ideas with turbo combos and engine set up would be great.

Cheers BEN

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70713-which-head-to-use-on-rb30det/
Share on other sites

Hi guys my mate just bought an R34 non turbo with the idea of putting a big combo into it and making big power.(up to 450wrkw).

I suggested useing the RB 30 bottom end and using the GTR head.he has heard of putting the neo head on!

as for turbo/s (he wants an external wastegate).I would use a set of 2835's as he wants to use the car for circut work as well.i would think that with the 3L and the work done to the engine it should come onto boost around 4500 i would think mayby sooner.

any ideas with turbo combos and engine set up would be great.

Cheers BEN

He's obviously not worried about $ so the GTR head would be the best way to go but there are some slight modifications that need to be done when mating the GTR head with the 3L block. If your going to go aftermarket turbos then why not just go for one large highmount one? Its much easier to set up and is probably cheaper too. But when looking for 450rwkws hes going to have to look into some body strengthening too as producing 450rwks and being able to use 450rwks is 2 completely different things especially in a RWD.

Just some things to think about sorry i couldnt help with the specific details you are after :)

When i said 2835's i meant in hight mount configuration.

Also i spoke to CRD and they said that the torque you gain down low is not worth the revs you loose up top.

any coments.

Its got everything to do with airflow. The extra torque at low rpms is nice.

That depends on where you plan the rev the rb25 or rb26.

An RB30 making power to 7500rpm may push say 52.8 lb/s of air.

To match that same 52.8 lb/s of air the 2.5ltr would have to rev to 8650rpm.

How many RB's do you see making their peak power at 8650rpm. :cheers: Not many.

The higher you rev a motor the higher the power loss is through friction.

Obviously the lower reving motor is more efficient at making its power.

Besides the point, a set of cams to rev the 2.5ltr and make its peak airflow (power) figure at 8650rpm would have to be pretty wild and unstreetable.

Be sure to stiffen up the bottom end (crank girdle) if you are going to be reving the 3ltr to 8500rpm. Thats fairly insane RPM.

Not even the Gibson Motorsport GTR rev'd its RB26 that hard.

They found the rebuild frequency was very high over 7000-7500rpm.

You are probably better off running more boost and keeping the rpm lower.

If you run out of effiency running the higher boost step the turbo's up a size.

Depends how often you like the rebuild motors.

The Benifit of the 3ltr is for any given RPM its always going to be pushing more air. Take this in to consideration when selecting the turbine a/r.

With the right cams and turbo specs its always going to be making more power.

600hp,

What were you planning on reving the rb25 or 26 to????

3ltr to 8500rpm is like reving the rb25 or 26 to 10,200rpm.

3ltr to 7500rpm = rb25 or 26 to 9000rpm.

Race_Snooze,

The RB26DETT head and R32 RB25DE N/A head are the easiest to fit.

The R32 RB25 head simply bolts up.

The RB26DETT head needs to have the block headbolt holes enlarged and retapped.

The R33 RB25 head needs to have the vct's oil galley in the head welded up, then an oil feed from the oil pressure sender to the vct supplied.

Bit of a pain in the arse but the slightly extra mid range is worth while if you are sticking with relatively stock cams (up to 260duration).

Edit: I guess thes got answered -  

1. How hard is to mate the GTR head to the RB30 block?  

2. Also, what compression would you get with the RB26 head and RB30 block combo?

1. Easy, no mods required, other than drill and tap the block for the 12 mm RB26 head bolts, RB20/25/30 are 11 mm. We use 12.5 mm ARP head studs for their higher clamping pressure.

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers. I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.

If he is REALLY going to use it for circuit work, then ~ 650 bhp would be my target. We have found it very difficult to get more than that to the ground in a 2wd application. And we have very sophisticated shock absorbers, adjustable anti roll, anti dive, anti squat, caster camber and toe and a larger selection of spring rates.

The main problem however, is response. Over 650 bhp even in a 3.1 litre, gets very difficult to tune for the rapid throttle response necessary for running decent and consistent lap times. Even at that power level, driving it fast requires considerable skill and experience.

:D

600hp,

What were you planning on reving the rb25 or 26 to????

3ltr to 8500rpm is like reving the rb25 or 26 to 10,200rpm.

3ltr to 7500rpm = rb25 or 26 to 9000rpm.

 

Race_Snooze,

The RB26DETT head and R32 RB25DE N/A head are the easiest to fit.

The R32 RB25 head simply bolts up.

The RB26DETT head needs to have the block headbolt holes enlarged and retapped.

 

The R33 RB25 head needs to have the vct's oil galley in the head welded up, then an oil feed from the oil pressure sender to the vct supplied.

Bit of a pain in the arse but the slightly extra mid range is worth while if you are sticking with relatively stock cams (up to 260duration).

Cheers.

1. Easy, no mods required, other than drill and tap the block for the 12 mm RB26 head bolts, RB20/25/30 are 11 mm.  We use 12.5 mm ARP head studs for their higher clamping pressure.

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers.  I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.

If he is REALLY going to use it for circuit work, then ~ 650 bhp would be my target.  We have found it very difficult to get more than that to the ground in a 2wd application.  And we have very sophisticated shock absorbers, adjustable anti roll, anti dive, anti squat, caster camber and toe and a larger selection of spring rates.  

The main problem however, is response.  Over 650 bhp even in a 3.1 litre, gets very difficult to tune for the rapid throttle response necessary for running decent and consistent lap times.  Even at that power level, driving it fast requires considerable skill and experience.

:D

For a reliable street setup:

For the argument sake, if you could get a RB26 head at the same price as the R32 RB25de head which one would you use and why?

What compression ratio would you aim for and (if not stock) what pistons and head gasket would you use to achive that?

What would be a reasonable power target?

:)

2. Depends on what pistons you use, what head gasket and how much you polish the combustion chambers.  I have seen compression ratios from 7.5 to 1 to 13.5 to 1.:D

If the bowls of the head are polished to a mirror finish, would this benefit a compression of approx 8.8:1?

The pistons are ARIAS rb30 forgies to suit the twin cam head (25 VVT). The pistons and valves have been ceramic coated.

The bowls in the head had some "pitting" around all of the inlet valve areas of the bowls, I assume this was from detonation (head came of a worn bottom end). These "pits" were smoothed out and polished to a mirror finish, the bowls are yet to be cc'd.

Doing this to the bowls would lower the comp slightly? (head gasket hasnt been chosen yet).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
    • Noted. Have noticed BMW are more 'high maintenance' for sure. They've attracted my attention as I think the used car prices seem reasonable vs other options, and the extra quality overall vs a commodore / camry / corolla or similar of the same vintage is appealing, especially the interior, and they are more on the sporty side whereas the others mentioned can be more cruising or economical A-to-B only.
    • Haha yeah I know, this is SAU after all, why are we talking about BMW's of all things!? I hear you on the 'don't have to worry about it' side of things. Having been fortunate enough to be have been able to buy a brand new motorbike or two...never really enjoyed them as much as I'd have liked as you worry so much about where you park it, will it get scratched, stolen, attempted theft, knocked over, etc...and yes dirty. Older less valuable bikes you can just go where you want and park it wherever and not really worry that much in comparison. And who cares if it gets dirty! Never owned a V8, and have had my eyes on VE / VF commodores for years but with their prices climbing so high, the M3 has come into focus more as prices are much closer than I've ever seen...is it a potential contender now?...of course need to factor in the S65 'maintenance' especially and like you said general M car 'tax'. One can dream anyway. But more on the reality front - did read the whole 330i thread as well and was a great read too, both threads enlightening as I've never even driven one of these cars! I do recall 330i didn't seem to have the same amount of issues for almost the same car (turbos and related differences notwithstanding)...perhaps down to getting it earlier in it's life so looked after better than the 335i? Perhaps so as your 130i has been good and quite similar, so finding a car that's been looked after well is the especially-crucial-BMW-first-step.
    • Nice. Dont worry about the time of not running. My current skyline hasn't run since I bought it. About 8 years ago.
    • It's also worth noting that I am heavily and unconditionally biased. I've had a lot of cars including some GTRs a fair while ago. I love my BMW's now a lot. They make no sense a lot of the time and the guys on here remind me regularly that I could get something else that does what I want better and cheaper. If you're going to take on an older BMW it's definitely a commitment. If you bail on it early you'll lose money and also the ability for it to put a smile on your face. Stick with it and it just gets better.  f**k I should get into advertising.  
×
×
  • Create New...