Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There is a vast choice of 'after market intercoolers' in the market place. If one was to look at replacing their intercooler, what would be one of the better choices? Is a 'bar and plate' configuration superior to a 'tube and fin'? The second half of the question is - has anyone had any experience in relation to the efficiency of one make of cooler over another?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71151-what-type-of-intercooler/
Share on other sites

Hi Marc2, plenty written on this, maybe do a search for more details. My 20 cents worth follows;

There are 4 important things to consider when choosing an intercooler;

1. Cooling the inlet airflow (this effects the temperaturee of the inlet air)

2. The effect of the intercooler on the radiator (this effects the water temp of the engine)

3. The efficiency in passing inlet airflow through the intercooler (this is a measure of how much pressure loss there is across the core)

4. It's internal volume (this effects the throttle response of the engine)

No one intercooler is superior in all 4 areas, they all are compromises. An example, a 600 X 300 X 100 bar and plate is good in #1 and #3 but bad in #2 and very bad in #4. The standard Stagea intercooler is good in #4 and #2, not so good in #1 and very bad in #3.

I have chosen a standard R34GTT intercooler, to keep #2 and #4 at good, improve #3 a lot and improve #1 a little bit. That set of compromises suites my Stagea usage.

On the race car we use a 600 X 300 X 100 tube and fin. It is good in #1 and #2, OK in #4 and we have a big enough turbo not to be concerned about #3.

My personal favourite all rounder is the standard R33/34 GTR intercooler. Up to 300 rwkw they are very hard to beat.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

Hi Marc2, plenty written on this, maybe do a search for more details.  My 20 cents worth follows;

There are 4 important things to consider when choosing an intercooler;

1. Cooling the inlet airflow (this effects the temperaturee of the inlet air)

2. The effect of the intercooler on the radiator (this effects the water temp of the engine)

3. The efficiency in passing inlet airflow through the intercooler (this is a measure of how much pressure loss there is across the core)

4. It's internal volume (this effects the throttle response of the engine)

No one intercooler is superior in all 4 areas, they all are compromises.  An example, a 600 X 300 X 100 bar and plate is good in #1 and #3 but bad in #2 and very bad in #4.  The standard Stagea intercooler is good in #4 and #2, not so good in #1 and very bad in #3.

I have chosen a standard R34GTT intercooler, to keep #2 and #4 at good, improve #3 a lot and improve #1 a little bit.  That set of compromises suites my Stagea usage.

On the race car we use a 600 X 300 X 100 tube and fin.   It is good in #1 and #2, OK in #4 and we have a big enough turbo not to be concerned about #3.

My personal favourite all rounder is the standard R33/34 GTR intercooler.  Up to 300 rwkw they are very hard to beat.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

SK,

You are most helpful with your timely repsonses and the information provided - greatly appreciated.

Have sent a PM.

regards,

Marc2

Another FMIC question... looking at the Blitz LM Intercooler kit for Stageas coz its on sale with Nengun for $1090. However from my understanding (limited!) its best to get a FMIC that doesnt return the piping UNDER the intercooler (a sharp 180 degree bent pipe isnt best airflow apparently?)... can anyone work out from this picture if these Blitz intercooler kits are the kind that has the piping return under the intercooler, or if its the better setup with piping that heads up over the top?

nengun-product-129.jpg

Another FMIC question... looking at the Blitz LM Intercooler kit for Stageas coz its on sale with Nengun for $1090.  However from my understanding (limited!) its best to get a FMIC that doesnt return the piping UNDER the intercooler (a sharp 180 degree bent pipe isnt best airflow apparently?)... can anyone work out from this picture if these Blitz intercooler kits are the kind that has the piping return under the intercooler, or if its the better setup with piping that heads up over the top?

nengun-product-129.jpg

I guess the second part to this question is - if this kit IS the type that returns under the intercooler - how "preferable" are we talking - is this type that returns under the intercooler just not worth doing - or just not AS good as the other piping set-up... it just seems a good price - and I'm after value for money rather than the absolute BEST setup.

;)

i would say that one is not the return under as if you see the piping for the under ones either have a really sharp bend like 180 degree one and i have seen some IC's that actually have an outlet pipe sticking out the bottom of the IC not out the side like most converional ic's

Thanks Leech - u r correct... it was funny but I answered my own question searching through all the Stagea pictures I downloaded months ago before deciding to buy - didnt remember downloading this one - but it shows the Blitz Stagea intercooler its not one with piping that returns under the FMIC lol

blitzic.jpeg

:rofl:

I have the return under intercooler type, its 250 x 600 x 76. the best thing about this kit was not having to cut a massive hole in the car to fit piping. i had a thread about it a while back, it should still be around if you look. i took a few pictures of the process. it's a direct bolt on kit too, so no mucking around with piping. i noticed an improvement in engine response straight away, and havn't had any trouble with overheating due to the radiator being covered a bit more.

hope this helps with your choice.

If you stumble on this post SK... couple of questions for ya or anyone else with some info Id appreciate on 2 things

1. SK, you mentioned somewhere I read that one of your favourite all-round intercoolers (best combo of trade-offs) was the actual GTR intercoolers. Just wondering how easily you think these would be to fit to Stags. And as part of that question - is there much difference between R32/R33/R34 intercoolers that would make any version more adaptable. I might be able to pick up a cheap R32GTR FMIC - but not sure how easily Ill be able to fit and pipe it up to the Series 2 Stag?

2. Regarding Piping set-up options (left pipe return under FMIC style vs up and round head already discussed)... but i am wondering if the most direct flowing + least amount of piping setup, if you can be bothered and got $, is by getting a new plenum with a front facing throttle so that the left side piping from the FMIC can just go straight up to it... piccy here:

attachment.php?attachmentid=35716

any thoughts on this type of set-up??? Or somewhere I can be pointed to for lengthy discussion and info on this sort of stuff to learn for myself?

Thanks heaps!

:D

Adam

If you stumble on this post SK... couple of questions for ya or anyone else with some info Id appreciate on 2 things

1.  SK, you mentioned somewhere I read that one of your favourite all-round intercoolers (best combo of trade-offs) was the actual GTR intercoolers.  Just wondering how easily you think these would be to fit to Stags.  And as part of that question - is there much difference between R32/R33/R34 intercoolers that would make any version more adaptable.  I might be able to pick up a cheap R32GTR FMIC - but not sure how easily Ill be able to fit and pipe it up to the Series 2 Stag?

2.  Regarding Piping set-up options (left pipe return under FMIC style vs up and round head already discussed)... but i am wondering if the most direct flowing + least amount of piping setup, if you can be bothered and got $, is by getting a new plenum with a front facing throttle so that the left side piping from the FMIC can just go straight up to it... piccy here:

attachment.php?attachmentid=35716  

any thoughts on this type of set-up???  Or somewhere I can be pointed to for lengthy discussion and info on this sort of stuff to learn for myself?

Thanks heaps!

:rofl:  

Adam

Hi Adam, I stumbled......

1. The R32 intercooler is supposed to be slightly less efficient in internal airflow than the R33 or R34. The external dimensions and appearance are almost identical however. The generally accepted number is 300 rwkw from the R33/34 until we start to run into noticeable restriction. But I have run 420+rwkw though an R32 GTR intercooler and it was pretty damn good, better than many aftemarket coolers. However I was using a turbo and engine configuration that didn't require a lot of boost to make that sort of power.

I don't know what power target you are aiming for but I would be totally comfortable in using an R32 GTR intercooler up to 300 rwkw.

2. Oh dear! The old pipework question, I reckon the most often asked one on the forum. I have tested moved throttle bodies on standard plenums and the air distribution is terrible, personaly I wouldn't even think about it. If your power target is over 300 rwkw (that means forged rods and pistons) then the Greddy plenum is the one I would use. RIPS, UAS and Sub Zero have fabricated designs but they cost almost the same as the Greddy.

If you are sticking with standard internals, then the 120 degree bend at the throttle body style of intercooler pipework is the go. It takes a noticeable amount of volume out of the pipework (compared to behind the radiator or under the intercooler styles) without compromising the inlet distrbution.

I first saw this design on the Gibson R31 GTSR and over the years we have fitted it to a number of cars and it has been copied by quite a few pipework fabricators.

Gibson_R31_GTSR_Pipework.jpg

This is the latest generation

NN_120_Degree_Front.JPG

If you want to know more, I suggst doing a search, I have posted (numerous times) the calculations for the pipework volume and amount of delay in throttle response from various designs.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

I have a gtr cooler fitted to mine. Pipework was bought off this forum for around $500 making the whole thing around $850. With that being said I probably would have prefered (now) to go for a hybrid kit as there is less stuffing around. I had to remove my washer bottle as well that is besides being annoying - illeagal. It did allow me to run the boost I wanted too and has improved the performance of the car at the end of the day.

Ken

Hey SK or anyone else of course lol - one last piping question... Ive spent 2 days searching as you suggested, which has turned up loads of extra info - but not found out the exact answer I am looking for about these Blitz kits.

Know anything about where these Blitz kits (made specifically for the Neo6 set-up in the stags, and the equivalent kit for the R34GTT) run their pipework? Has any1 ever seen one or a pic of one hooked up to an R34 GTT?. I think it joins up to the stock pipework, but cant be sure... if it doesn then if it doesnt return UNDER the cooler - where does it go - behind? Does that still give a 180 deg bend??. But yeah - I cant work out exactly where it'll run... up and behind radiator or all up the passenger side existing pipes etc.

I am only heading towards this kit because the enquiries i've made with workshops over here about custom piping would mean cutting into the plastic Neo6 engine cover, fan baldes, removing stock air-box etc. If the Blitz kit works around everything in the engine bay without doing a straight 180 deg bend out of the FMIC outlet then I might just go with that...

:cheers:

Hey SK or anyone else of course lol - one last piping question... Ive spent 2 days searching as you suggested, which has turned up loads of extra info - but not found out the exact answer I am looking for about these Blitz kits.

Know anything about where these Blitz kits (made specifically for the Neo6 set-up in the stags, and the equivalent kit for the R34GTT) run their pipework?  Has any1 ever seen one or a pic of one hooked up to an R34 GTT?.  I think it joins up to the stock pipework, but cant be sure... if it doesn then if it doesnt return UNDER the cooler - where does it go - behind? Does that still give a 180 deg bend??.  But yeah - I cant work out exactly where it'll run... up and behind radiator or all up the passenger side existing pipes etc.

I am only heading towards this kit because the enquiries i've made with workshops over here about custom piping would mean cutting into the plastic Neo6 engine cover, fan baldes, removing stock air-box etc.   If the Blitz kit works around everything in the engine bay without doing a straight 180 deg bend out of the FMIC outlet then I might just go with that...

:cheers:

The Blitz kit must be a return under/behind the intercooler style of pipework. It would be impossible for it to be any other design as they all need to have something cut. At the very least other pipework designs need the GTR stamped hole in the RHS innner guard to be cut out (same as a GTR has).

You should be aware that there is a Apexi GT-spec intercooler kit that does the same, I have seen one on a R34GTT.

:rant:

Woohoo - thanks Burns and SK... finally know where that dam piping goes ... doesnt go directly back along the bottom of the core like others - but from your pics heads backwards and comes along behind the core...CHEERS !!

Hey Burns - so this looks like it could be a relatively easy Do It Yourselfer???

Thanks guys - most helpful!

:headspin:

It looks like a reasonably easy install. All the brackets for the pipes have slotted bolt holes and the piping looks like it goes together easily enough. The cooler its self looks like it mounts on 3 brackets 2 on the bottom and 1 on top. The only tricky bits would be trimming the bumper reinforcement and a little bit of the bar bellow the indicators for the pipes to fit but should not require any more than marking it out and careful trimming with a jig saw with a steady hand.

I think you will probably have to do away with you air box too. Mine cam with a pod installed and I can’t see how an air box would have fitted in there. I’m still trying to work out how I’m going to fit a cold air partition in.

front2.JPG

1246RIMG0896.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
×
×
  • Create New...