Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Remember you have to right next to the exchange to get the 24MBPS. otherwise find out you exchange and then u can graph what speed wyou are going to get. also remember u need to buy and ADSL2 compatible modem.

Internode are by far the best ISP in Australia.

Cable is great when no one in your area uses it and ur right next to the exchange.

Ah yes I think the Internode's 24mbps ADSL2+ is also very interesting.., extremely higher speed than the common ADSL.. I hope ur area could get it faster.., or maybe just connect to another Internode plan while waiting, and upgrade the plan when it's available, altough there must be some fees, and u must use a different modem.. but considering this is a different network system, I'm personally still unsure whether it can be upgraded or not.. Anyway, you should consider this one as well..

256k = 26k/s

512k = 55k/s

1500k = 165k/s

Ping times are better (which is what matters) so yes 1500k would be more ideal for gaming than 512k especially with the upload speeds (128k vs 256k) which is what slows down your connection when gaming.

that would be great to dl games/movies everyday but aint atm all day which would mean that i would not require that much of a dl cap, i'd say 15 - 20 gb would be plenty. Ill try 1.5mb and so how fast it is then upgrade if i need more speed or avaliable which means that the $60 plan i think it is would be more than enough for now.

I am with Bigponds cable network, and I am yet to see anyone else get the same speed as I do (in their homes). I am very happy with the service and reliability of BP Cable (but I do realise they weren't always that good in the past)

Ben, I admit I dont know much about internodes 24MBit, but until they deliver it into my street I wouldnt pick them as an ISP because in my experience "the next 2-3mths" often ends up beeing 12-24mths. That said I will look at it when its offered.

ATM its cable for me.

Ditto.

I've been using Bigpond Cable for the past 20 months and have also been delighted with the blistering performance. Friend has recently moved to a 1.5/256 ADSL connection through TPG and although it's as quick as any other connection I've come across, it's not a patch on Cable.

If you want service, reliability and performance, go Internode ADSL. It's not the cheapest around, but I wouldn't bother compromising my quality of service for the sake of a few bucks. I also happen to be an authorised reseller of Internode's services and can vouch for their "real world" support and performance.

A key differentiator for Bigpond Cable is the fact that you cannot get a fixed IP address. If you're running a web or mail server, you will have to use a separate Dynamic DNS service provider.

Also Telstra will not support your connection if it is managed by a hardware Firewall/Router. They will want you to bypass everything and revert back to the Bigpond "Hearbeat" Client. Telstra's cable service still uses the old technology "heartbeat" system which can cause considerable grief with Routers that cannot handle this method of connection properly (disconnects and cannot reconnect without a hard reset). If service and support are important to you, I urge you to stay away from Bigpond.

In reality, ADSL2 will return performance equivalent to or slightly better than Cable, ADSL2+ faster again. Both use better, more advanced technology which provides features that Cable simply can't provide.

But please be aware that ADSL2 and ADSL2+ only quote "up to" speeds, NOT guaranteed connection speeds. The fact is, further you are from the DSLAM, the slower your maximum speed will be. For example, the maximum speed achievable on ADSL2+ is effectively HALVED by the time you are only 1Km away from the DSLAM. As long as you live within 500m of the Exchange, your connection will be the envy of all mankind!! ;o)

At the end of the day,

1/ Don't scab out on your Internet

2/ Go for a provider that supports CHURN (if you still want the convenience of choice)

3/ If you can't commit to a lengthy contract, go with ADSL (Cable is usually 18-24mth contract if you want a reasonable connection fee).

Have fun.....

For example, the maximum speed achievable on ADSL2+ is effectively HALVED by the time you are only 1Km away from the DSLAM.
Not quite true. The maximum speed of ADSL2+ is 24MBit and speeds of 18.7MBit have been reported from ~2.2km (obviously though this is 1 example and it's more of a case-by-case basis due to the different copper networks around Australia).

Before joining up I did a little research.

I chose Internode and have been with them for the last year.

Excellent ISP, not a single complaint.

Unlike TPG, Bigpond & E-Access that my oldies were connected to, they are now on Internode and strange enough the email problems, occasional web browsing speed problems and jerky Uni lecture streaming play backs have dissapeared. :)

http://www.agile.com.au/data/connectivity.htm

That being said at this very moment in time Cable still has the upper hand for downloading. Uploading is another story. ADSL has faster speeds for uploading.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
×
×
  • Create New...