Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm, tough question.

If both engines are STOCK:

The RB20DET will be much more efficient then that of the SR20DET. Apart from more torque. the engines made for a slightly heavier car.

HOWEVER,

If you are serious about modifying the engine. The SR20 will be much cheaper to as parts are more widespread and at the same time there are less cylinders. The SR20 is much more stable at higher powers than the RB20.

I'm no mechanic, but thats how I would be considering it.

If it were me, the choice would be between an SR20DET and an RB25DET. Converting an SR (or even a CA) 180 to an RB isn't worth it, IMO, if you just go with the RB20. Nice engine, but the costs incurred would've been better spent either modifying the SR (or making the diff between a CA and SR 180) or spending that bit extra and going the full hog with an RB25 (or RB30!).

Hmmm, tough question.

If both engines are STOCK:

The RB20DET will be much more efficient then that of the SR20DET. Apart from more torque. the engines made for a slightly heavier car.

The RB20 actually has less torque than the SR20det.

There's something about the low down torque that makes the sr20 more enjoyable (imo). When driving my flatmates r32 I find I have to push it always, mine I can drive under 4000rpm and it still pulls up hills with stuff in the car AND it's my cars heavier.

But the rb20 is cheaper and revs out nicer and also has a great exhaust note, it's refined and urgent.. the sr20 is harsher and gnashy.

On the other hand as mentioned somewhere with an sr20 in it, it's the engine that it came with from the factory so bolt on stuff would be easier.

Heh I really like the sr20 but loving my old 351 v8 I would pick the torque over the revs.

Bollocks, harden front susp.

No. What he is referring to is the alloy block of the SR20 weighing less than that of the RB20. By putting a heavier engine in, it disrupts the natural balance of the car.

The way I see it the SR20 was produced up until 2002. So it can't be that bad.

hey guys sorry if im wasting your time on this but i just wanted to know what you's think would run better in a 180SX.... a SR20DET or a RB20DET

no doubt the SR20 is the smart choice. it's lighter, it's designed for the car, and it has no problems in making equal power to the RB. only reason to put an RB in there (either 20, 25 or 26) is to be different (not really valid as heaps of people have done these swaps) or for the sound. do the smart thing, stick with the SR.

Hmm, this thread looks like it belongs on nissansilvia.com, not sau

Yeah how good are S13 Silvias that come standard from factory with RB20DET..

Think about the fact he is asking because people on SAU most likely have *RB20DET*'s in their R32 GTS-t's...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...