Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

There was quite an interesting dicussion of oil filters in the maintenance section awhile ago.

In a similar vein, I have search for some discussion of fuel filters but drawn a blank. They get mentioned an awful lot, but usually its 'replace your fuel filter'. Soooo, is there anything to choose between the various fuel filters one can buy? Should I just grab the genuine article from Nissan, or will any supercheap yum-cha brand do?

Thoughts and suggestions are welcome :(

Lucien.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/
Share on other sites

genuine nissan is (always has been) the go for me.

I wouldn't bother with aftermarket ones in this case. unless of course you had a 10000hp fuel pump and 1000cc injectors and the stock filter was a restriction.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1320812
Share on other sites

As mmmgtir mentioned the OEM fuel filter is still pretty good & quite efficient.

When I first bought my car I was experiencing a pressure drop of around 2.4+psi, the car had a cheap fuel filter. I had it replaced with a Nissan item. Now, although Im only running just under 200rwkw, Im told theres only a pressure drop of under .8psi.

Basically, you would only want to upgrade to a performance one if you want to decrease the pressure drop across & near the filter. Performance filters normally have a pressure drop of <.3psi & filter down to the 10-30 microns range (not sure what the OEM is rated at).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1320944
Share on other sites

Interesting. I just spoke to Crows Nest Nissan to try and order the OEM fuel filter. The part number they have comes up as no longer being produced, and there is no updated number attached.

Does anyone have the part number -- one they have actually used, not just ripped from FAST because Crows Nest Nissan is using FAST -- for the R32 GT-R fuel filter ?

LW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1321079
Share on other sites

Can that part also be used on a 2001 R34 GTT??

With the proviso that's it's better to have the VIN of your car (from the Nissan ID plate on the firewall), according to FAST the PN for the fuel filter on your car is:

16400-41B05

Suggests the filter is different to the R32 type.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1321681
Share on other sites

With the proviso that's it's better to have the VIN of your car (from the Nissan ID plate on the firewall), according to FAST the PN for the fuel filter on your car is:

16400-41B05

Suggests the filter is different to the R32 type.

SteveL PM SENT.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1322076
Share on other sites

The OEM R32 GTR fuel filter PN is:

16400-72L00

but this was superceded by PN:

16400-72L05

and that was further superceded by PN:

16400-53J10

I will run those past Troy and see what turns up.

someonestolecc: Make sure you ask for Troy. Apparently they do COD; personally I just go and pick it up. Your best to do your research before hand and have part numbers handy as they are obviously not import specialist: they are just willing to help so cut them a little slack ;)

(B1) MR_fanny: I had a look at the Ryco part numbers and its not the same as the GTS-t. They run Z200/201/202 (or something) but the GT-R is listed as completely different. Sorry for not being specific, I CBF'ed finding the Ryco listing :(

pkblade: Given the Ryco part numbers are different, are you sure about that?

LW.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1322395
Share on other sites

Given the Ryco part numbers are different, are you sure about that?
Im 100% sure.

According to the Ryco listing Cubes provided :) the 16400-53J10 is the equivalent to the z387, which also, can be used on all RB20's, RB25's (no mention of the Neo), & RB26's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/71633-fuel-filters/#findComment-1322849
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...