Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If so, "scandanvian flick", its how you get the saab to oversteer :D

You'll see it in any rally car approaching a corner, instead of a usual racing line (outside, in to apex, outside again on exit), they approach on the inside of the corner, turn to the outside, and then turn in again to the apex (or sliding past) in one smooth motion. This means the back of the car "flicks" around, increasing its tendancy to oversteer.

Same works fine if you're trying to get the skyline sideways (don't need to do anything brutual like using the handbrake).

Perhaps fatz could offer more...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-106406
Share on other sites

umm yep slip, I won't be forgetting that in a hurry :D;):)

can't remember WHAT i hung onto in your car, but I hope you've removed the fingernails hehe :D

thanx for the replies everyone....Duncan especially, i can picture what u mean from what you wrote...which is good cos it's sometimes hard to understand when "written down"... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-110565
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

i thought inertia drift was where, whilst cornereing, the inertia/weight of the rear end of the car forces the rear end slightly to the side, therefor breaking traction allowing you to plant it to keep it sideways, with the rally style counter sway into sharper corners, is to get the car to be almost straight after the corner with minimal extra sway, the drift version of this is to plant the crap out of it when you do it, and hold the anti lock and feel the car around the corner....i think???? this is how it feels for me...but im not a pro....iv never been on track, only street......so shhhh..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-296798
Share on other sites

I always thought that inertia drift was just one of the "dorifto names" for the old feint drift ttechnique. If so then yeah,for a right turn, flick it hard left, then flick hard right, as the weight is about to transfer get the tyres loose and presto, sideways. Its the only way I can get the rear out predicably with the meagre power of my rb30e, aside from late drift coming out of a Corner.

It would be the best way to link multiple left and rights, which you can do by ,in essence, over correcting so that at the end of the slide through bend number one it flicks into a slide through bend 2.

Its the same physics principle as when you get over confident and under skilled and start whiteknuckle fishtailing down the road when you over correct, you know how the car flicks right uncontrollably from the left etc when you are not in tune with the controls? you are trying to do this in a controlled fashion.

cheers,

floody

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-297631
Share on other sites

r32, i'm pretty sure what u're describing is another technique. feint drifting applies to using the suspension rebound of the car to induce oversteer.

what u're describing is hard braking entry into corner, forcing weight from the rear to the front. this puts more weight on the front tyre, allowing u to control steering. the weight off the rear makes the tyres sort of come loose and whip around, again an oversteer situation.

in mid-corner, like in rallies, and to a lesser extent, on the track, the technique is applied using the left leg, allowing the car, if understeering in the corner, to gain traction and slight oversteer so u can turn the corner and not run into the tyre wall.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-298270
Share on other sites

r32, i'm not too sure about what u're saying, however drifting round a course requires the driver to link a lot of drift techniques together to successfully get through the course.

what i have described in my previous thread is known as weight transfer and is widely used in all forms of motorsports. it's not only meant for drift but to assist turn in, apex and exit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-298624
Share on other sites

shell ..,,,, inertia drift describes itself really ... its as simple as picturing in slow motion going around a corner when u tighten up your weight transfer is too great for the two rubbers in the rear of the car to hold the laterall g forces so in turn they let go of the road and struggle for grip thats in their threashhold. basically till u ease off the throttle or pick up so much speed ur engine dont develope the power to keep em going ..... i noticed people talking about scandinavian flick???? what the hell??? anyway,,, in the world of drifting and rallying it is called PENDULLUM this is when ur going flat knackers down a straight comming to sharp bend usually a 5right or left or tighter,, when u apply the brakes hard the weight transfer goes all the way to the front starting a sideways motion cuz the back wheels are locked up and the front are just barley turning. to keep the car on the side of the road u need ,,, its training that teaches u how to pendullum swing,,,,,

i hope this helped u shell ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-308441
Share on other sites

i noticed people talking about scandinavian flick???? what the hell??? anyway,,, in the world of drifting and rallying it is called PENDULLUM this is when ur going flat knackers down a straight comming to sharp bend usually a 5right or left or tighter,, when u apply the brakes hard the weight transfer goes all the way to the front starting a sideways motion cuz the back wheels are locked up and the front are just barley turning. to keep the car on the side of the road u need ,,, its training that teaches u how to pendullum swing,,,,,

"In the world of drifting and rallying"? do you have anything to do with rallying? ever met a rally driver? scandinavian flick is the most common colloquial term they use for the left/right/left (or vice versa) flick technique, to set the car up into a slide. It is not done because the car is all over the place with locked wheels (though they might be locked up), its done to set the car up on the right attitude for the corner, and its more efficient than yanking the handbrake, a clutch kick or most of the techniques touted by the drift(rice)boys. Also think about the physics-unless there is something wrong with the geometry/axle location of your car, braking hard will not make it sway side to side down the road, unless there is some outside factor. :)

Ok that done, so is this inertia drift you speak of a method of making a car slide through artificially inducing instability under braking? through weird suspension setup, excessive front end dive or adverse brake biasing? Someone once said- "drift workshops- you mean you pay them money to make your car handle like shit?!?" :)

cheers,

floody

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-310777
Share on other sites

making it sway side to side is not done by the brakes. it's done with the steering wheel. braking is used to transfer weight, putting weight on the front allows front to turn in, loosening back for oversteer situation.

the left/right/left flick is the feint drift, but i'm assuming you want to link 2 corners together using the flick, thus, when you exit the 1st say right hander and the left is coming towards you, you could use the suspension rebound from the 1st right hander to induce oversteer for the 2nd corner.

clutch kick is not a lousy technique. it's used to overcome understeer and if you'd download some jap drift videos, you will hear the obvious rise in rpm when they dive into a drift, which is the clutch kick.

locking up the wheels, is again, another technique used to drift, which is called shift lock. using excessive downshit without heel toe to balance the car causes compression lockup which locks the rears.

there are drift setups for cars, but i assume these cars won't be driven on a daily basis. excessive camber and toe out would not be a good thing for a car to have on the highway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-310884
Share on other sites

mmm interesting ,,,, FLOODY i see "theory" has overtaken u lot

Try doing it your way 160 kays round a powder coated ballbearing gravel forest and we shall see the scandinavian bumjack.. everyone has there style,,, text is easily mis-interprited

i dont want arguments,, for ur information there is nothing wrong with our evo 3 or 6 or any other car in the arc or wrc,, take the time get some footage with no commentry listen to the cars i mean really listen them,,, maybe u misunderstood maybe my story was not what i wanted to describe,,, who knows ,, but i tell u what if u think u can defy the law of physics and u can swing 1200kg of weight doin 160 170 kays and slamming the brakes round a slight bend and keep it straight cuz ur car is perfect .... i will kiss my own ass,,, and there will be a new class made just for you,,,, THE UDOTU ultimate drivers of the universe.

rb26dett i know swaying is not made by the brakes ,,, but just thing of another factor .... the brakes on our cars ar not small like brembos,,,, on gtrs' 14 inch discs on the light weight rockets,,, just think we peel off tread on dirt roads the ass of these cars just barely touch the ground on hard braking,,, look im not wrc master but i do know how to pendullum a car i have done it ,, i teach it . i was assesed on it,,, i was tought it .. PLEASE everyone dont think a car handles on dirt like it does on road ,,, i preffer the road but its progressive, smooth, predictable .. lol just jump in constant 4wd setup like that and u will understand and when u do (IF U DO) ur both gonna say FARRK THAT DOPE MENIOS WAS RIGHT ,,,,,

regards menios.....

cheers,,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-312028
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...