Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If so, "scandanvian flick", its how you get the saab to oversteer :D

You'll see it in any rally car approaching a corner, instead of a usual racing line (outside, in to apex, outside again on exit), they approach on the inside of the corner, turn to the outside, and then turn in again to the apex (or sliding past) in one smooth motion. This means the back of the car "flicks" around, increasing its tendancy to oversteer.

Same works fine if you're trying to get the skyline sideways (don't need to do anything brutual like using the handbrake).

Perhaps fatz could offer more...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-106406
Share on other sites

umm yep slip, I won't be forgetting that in a hurry :D;):)

can't remember WHAT i hung onto in your car, but I hope you've removed the fingernails hehe :D

thanx for the replies everyone....Duncan especially, i can picture what u mean from what you wrote...which is good cos it's sometimes hard to understand when "written down"... ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-110565
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

i thought inertia drift was where, whilst cornereing, the inertia/weight of the rear end of the car forces the rear end slightly to the side, therefor breaking traction allowing you to plant it to keep it sideways, with the rally style counter sway into sharper corners, is to get the car to be almost straight after the corner with minimal extra sway, the drift version of this is to plant the crap out of it when you do it, and hold the anti lock and feel the car around the corner....i think???? this is how it feels for me...but im not a pro....iv never been on track, only street......so shhhh..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-296798
Share on other sites

I always thought that inertia drift was just one of the "dorifto names" for the old feint drift ttechnique. If so then yeah,for a right turn, flick it hard left, then flick hard right, as the weight is about to transfer get the tyres loose and presto, sideways. Its the only way I can get the rear out predicably with the meagre power of my rb30e, aside from late drift coming out of a Corner.

It would be the best way to link multiple left and rights, which you can do by ,in essence, over correcting so that at the end of the slide through bend number one it flicks into a slide through bend 2.

Its the same physics principle as when you get over confident and under skilled and start whiteknuckle fishtailing down the road when you over correct, you know how the car flicks right uncontrollably from the left etc when you are not in tune with the controls? you are trying to do this in a controlled fashion.

cheers,

floody

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-297631
Share on other sites

r32, i'm pretty sure what u're describing is another technique. feint drifting applies to using the suspension rebound of the car to induce oversteer.

what u're describing is hard braking entry into corner, forcing weight from the rear to the front. this puts more weight on the front tyre, allowing u to control steering. the weight off the rear makes the tyres sort of come loose and whip around, again an oversteer situation.

in mid-corner, like in rallies, and to a lesser extent, on the track, the technique is applied using the left leg, allowing the car, if understeering in the corner, to gain traction and slight oversteer so u can turn the corner and not run into the tyre wall.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-298270
Share on other sites

r32, i'm not too sure about what u're saying, however drifting round a course requires the driver to link a lot of drift techniques together to successfully get through the course.

what i have described in my previous thread is known as weight transfer and is widely used in all forms of motorsports. it's not only meant for drift but to assist turn in, apex and exit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-298624
Share on other sites

shell ..,,,, inertia drift describes itself really ... its as simple as picturing in slow motion going around a corner when u tighten up your weight transfer is too great for the two rubbers in the rear of the car to hold the laterall g forces so in turn they let go of the road and struggle for grip thats in their threashhold. basically till u ease off the throttle or pick up so much speed ur engine dont develope the power to keep em going ..... i noticed people talking about scandinavian flick???? what the hell??? anyway,,, in the world of drifting and rallying it is called PENDULLUM this is when ur going flat knackers down a straight comming to sharp bend usually a 5right or left or tighter,, when u apply the brakes hard the weight transfer goes all the way to the front starting a sideways motion cuz the back wheels are locked up and the front are just barley turning. to keep the car on the side of the road u need ,,, its training that teaches u how to pendullum swing,,,,,

i hope this helped u shell ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-308441
Share on other sites

i noticed people talking about scandinavian flick???? what the hell??? anyway,,, in the world of drifting and rallying it is called PENDULLUM this is when ur going flat knackers down a straight comming to sharp bend usually a 5right or left or tighter,, when u apply the brakes hard the weight transfer goes all the way to the front starting a sideways motion cuz the back wheels are locked up and the front are just barley turning. to keep the car on the side of the road u need ,,, its training that teaches u how to pendullum swing,,,,,

"In the world of drifting and rallying"? do you have anything to do with rallying? ever met a rally driver? scandinavian flick is the most common colloquial term they use for the left/right/left (or vice versa) flick technique, to set the car up into a slide. It is not done because the car is all over the place with locked wheels (though they might be locked up), its done to set the car up on the right attitude for the corner, and its more efficient than yanking the handbrake, a clutch kick or most of the techniques touted by the drift(rice)boys. Also think about the physics-unless there is something wrong with the geometry/axle location of your car, braking hard will not make it sway side to side down the road, unless there is some outside factor. :)

Ok that done, so is this inertia drift you speak of a method of making a car slide through artificially inducing instability under braking? through weird suspension setup, excessive front end dive or adverse brake biasing? Someone once said- "drift workshops- you mean you pay them money to make your car handle like shit?!?" :)

cheers,

floody

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-310777
Share on other sites

making it sway side to side is not done by the brakes. it's done with the steering wheel. braking is used to transfer weight, putting weight on the front allows front to turn in, loosening back for oversteer situation.

the left/right/left flick is the feint drift, but i'm assuming you want to link 2 corners together using the flick, thus, when you exit the 1st say right hander and the left is coming towards you, you could use the suspension rebound from the 1st right hander to induce oversteer for the 2nd corner.

clutch kick is not a lousy technique. it's used to overcome understeer and if you'd download some jap drift videos, you will hear the obvious rise in rpm when they dive into a drift, which is the clutch kick.

locking up the wheels, is again, another technique used to drift, which is called shift lock. using excessive downshit without heel toe to balance the car causes compression lockup which locks the rears.

there are drift setups for cars, but i assume these cars won't be driven on a daily basis. excessive camber and toe out would not be a good thing for a car to have on the highway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-310884
Share on other sites

mmm interesting ,,,, FLOODY i see "theory" has overtaken u lot

Try doing it your way 160 kays round a powder coated ballbearing gravel forest and we shall see the scandinavian bumjack.. everyone has there style,,, text is easily mis-interprited

i dont want arguments,, for ur information there is nothing wrong with our evo 3 or 6 or any other car in the arc or wrc,, take the time get some footage with no commentry listen to the cars i mean really listen them,,, maybe u misunderstood maybe my story was not what i wanted to describe,,, who knows ,, but i tell u what if u think u can defy the law of physics and u can swing 1200kg of weight doin 160 170 kays and slamming the brakes round a slight bend and keep it straight cuz ur car is perfect .... i will kiss my own ass,,, and there will be a new class made just for you,,,, THE UDOTU ultimate drivers of the universe.

rb26dett i know swaying is not made by the brakes ,,, but just thing of another factor .... the brakes on our cars ar not small like brembos,,,, on gtrs' 14 inch discs on the light weight rockets,,, just think we peel off tread on dirt roads the ass of these cars just barely touch the ground on hard braking,,, look im not wrc master but i do know how to pendullum a car i have done it ,, i teach it . i was assesed on it,,, i was tought it .. PLEASE everyone dont think a car handles on dirt like it does on road ,,, i preffer the road but its progressive, smooth, predictable .. lol just jump in constant 4wd setup like that and u will understand and when u do (IF U DO) ur both gonna say FARRK THAT DOPE MENIOS WAS RIGHT ,,,,,

regards menios.....

cheers,,

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7203-inertia-drift/#findComment-312028
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
×
×
  • Create New...