Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry menios, I just got the impression you were saying that the pendulum motion of a rally car was caused by it swinging out of control side to side- e.g that if you hit the brakes the car always just swings around on its own, without having to do anything with the steering-, which we both know, unless it was an extreme rutted gravel road, would be a symptom of pretty average chassis setup. I mean, regardless what rally car you are running, awd, rwd whatever, it should pull up fairly straight and true, unless you don't want it to (e.g setting up for a bend) ? right?

Anyway, sorry mate, its just your post was a *little* unclear. I must say, you're the first rally driver I've come across who hadn't heard the term scandinavian flick before :D

So tell me so that I can do it properly, in a rwd car, to set it up for a bend, with the pendulum technique, where do I do my braking?

cheers,

floody

lol no problems floody,, knowing terms all comes down to WHERE u learn and with whom... i suppose .. anyway basically i am not a rally driver.... ok lets clarify that.. i am a stage 2 rally instructor,, i drive the toyota sprinter and the vr4 much like the one driven by ed ordynski back in the hayday.. i only drive the evo during transport or maybe during testing... if i jump on a track ill be about 10 secons a kilometer off regular sick driver. about this rwd setup for a scandi flicko.... lol i think u know egsactly how to do it ,,, everybody has different respect for themselves,, and for there car and for the fear of death lol.... me? depending on my overun speed angle road surface ,,, i cant just give a distance as every coner is different with a different exit its by this u judge the flick the speed the braking etc etc,,,,

how are u shell i missed ya hows the car going ...

I was basically self tought for the past 2 years in the 33,, out in a undisclosed are in sutherland shire sydney... where the fire hydrants are lined up like runway lights,,, and the cops dont bother to go ,,,, for the past 6 months i was tought by 2 arc drivers who are also instructors ,, 1 name is mark haybittle ,,, hes a import from the uk,,, has raced wrc but couldnt afford it,, he owns extreme driving .net in nsw perth and melb. as for underground drift school??? i doubt it,,, just need a wet road with bends and practice,,,,, and prepare to search th tyre shops for old but treaded tyres .....usually every session u go to ,,,lol

have fun

menios i'm not debating the fact that u know how to do a pendulum swing.

the videos i was referring to are jap videos, homemade, amateur ones where there is no commentary. i was saying you can hear the clutch kick technique being applied.

i was not referring exactly to techniques applied by rally drivers as the japs do it on the track.

i have never thought the car handles the same on road and dirt. i know of the lack of traction on dirt surfaces.

i am unclear about your remark on constant 4wd. i understand understeer is common if u lack a certain enthusiasm on the throttle.

i am also unclear about what you are describing in your pendulum swing situation. if ur referring to rally driving, y would u be swinging around like that instead of trying to maintain as much traction as you could? if ur doing it for show, why would you want to go that fast? and for the record, i have never seen track cars applying the pendulum swing while in competition.

i have, however, been advised by an asian pacific racer of the left leg braking technique to assist turn in, not to drift. just like u, i have been taught track techniques by actual racers, however, i'm not saying i'm an authority on the subject, just wanted to pass on what i know and understand.

Guest drift_me_silly

inertia drift is not a scandanavian flick. that is a technique specifically developed for gravel turns or asphalt hairpins...inertia drift is a four-wheel slide (yes, front wheels as well) that is controlled by three things; grip available, rear wheel spin (relative to speed) and of course your steering angle. "real" inertia drift sees no steering at all through corners, only correction before and after. that in itself is the hardest part to grasp...i've only even seen inertia drift once, in the wet, and even then it looked a like a whole new ballgame compared to classic, rear wheel drive "slide" drifting. Because of the weight over the front wheels and the longing of the car to spin whilst in inertia drift state, it is incredibly easy to have the front or rear wheels come into a "grip patch", where a dry spot or a change in surface can spin teh car steeraight into the wall, or simply spin it on the spot. the faster you go, the harder it is to maintain real inertia drift. i know all this because i've seen it and the physics of it makes sense to me. -and yeah, rally is taught everywhere...you've just got to find it, like anything.

hey people... text is crap words never describe ur meaning as well as a live convo... basicall rb26dett i dont debate what u say ,, its cool relax ,, the thing to watch a video was to floody... anyway ,, 160kays,, huge hard brake ,, weight comes forward, tail WANTS to get happy u influence it with your steer wheel to wherever u want it ,,,,,, HOWS THAT FOR EASY EXPLANITORY,,,

i should just said that first,,,, DRIFT ME SILLY.... left foot braking is used yes ,, in a 4wd car ,,, only to get the SOME weight on the front wheels to get some steering ,,, WHILST GASSING IT.... its all getting to involved at the moment on this thread,,,

anywaaayyyyzzz

CHEERS TO ALL ,,,, SHELL THANKS FOR STARTING THIS lol

what about....im sideways 10 meters before the corner and still sideways 30 meters out of it, i dont use the hand brake, i just do the left to right to left, drop the clutch half way throug that...and follow the corner with my front wheels almost clipping gutters. on the apex and then at the end on the other side of the road 30 meters away...haha..thats my straight to the point view....

wb menios

yes folks he is a vegetable but a good driver.

fient drift is also used alot by guys inthe underpowered n/a drift cars like the ae86 etc its good an it works.

menios just hasn't heard of the scaninavian flick. ( menios its very old started by guys like ari vattenan in old escorts to get them to slide at high speed.it shown here in this vid

sorry its around 10 meg note the tugging of the wheel one way then another

meggala

http://meggala.com/driftless/driftlessonexpert1.wmv

hey meggala .. how u been man ,,, last time i spoke to u was mirc|? anyway hows ur beast going any new mods ???

i got a few happening ,,

new microtech LT 8 installed in 3 hours lol..

front mount .

electronic boost controller .

bald tyres custum made by me (were 265 35 18) now 17.5 inch lol

rb30det forgies all good bits, (almost finished)

brand spanker to4b 1.00 ar exhaust .6 ar comp.

hopefully nippon injectors 550cc

and last but never the least AV GAS lol...

oi meggala.... u got a megalo

:shake:

nice website by the way ,,, ill try and sent u a video (4mg) of my 3rd gear helis into a 90 degree drift almost into a hydrant then 180 do it all again but only to overheat, loose power GRAB traction and SLINGSHOT (but with the angels watching) end up IN A DRIVEWAY and didnt scratch a thing exept my ego lol......

i retired for that night by the way lol....:burnout:

Here is something you might find helpful. It is part of an article from the December 2001 Australian Issue of RALLY XS magazine.

The article is titled "Richard Burns Driving Masterclass - Sideways School" so there is to be no arguing about the accuracy of the content, OK! :P

There isn’t a lot of information, but there is a diagram that may help with your understanding.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...