Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I put a high tension lead in to check my timing and verified that my timing loop on the coil harness is off by 14 degrees. I set the timing to 15btdc like the FSM says and it ran like a pig, the motor also heated up quicker than normal (which sounds like retarded ignition to me). I put the light back on it and adjusted the CAS back to where the shadows from the bolts are (the original position) and it runs much better. The concern is that according to my timing light and 2 others my car is running 23 or 24 degrees btdc at normal operating temp. I don't hear any ping at all, and my SAFC is registering less than 70 at idle for the raw knock value.

When I had it at 15btdc the exhaust note was quite different and basically ran like shit until about 4000rpm. Now it runs like it should but I'm still concerned and don't trust the damned thing now, I don't want to lose a cylinder or two. The only thing I can figure is that the exhaust cam is off by a tooth on the timing belt. IIRC the teeth are approx 7 degrees per. I looked under the front cover and it 'looked' like the cams were timed right in relation to 0 on the crank but now I'm not so sure.

Anyone have any similar probs or ideas?

Thanks,

-Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72042-rb25det-strange-timing-issues/
Share on other sites

The only thing i can think of is a camshaft is out.

You said you have tried 3 timing lights already so it cant be that.

Every RB i play with, you can change the static timing anywhere from 10deg to 30deg and no real change in noise/note. When you add more timing it raises the idle a little (naturally) but other than that no real difference.

If you can get it to run like shit, by retarding the timing to 15deg btdc, something is wrong.

If it run like shit at 5deg btdc i would understand, but anywhere from 10deg btdc and up it should be very minimal the effect it has on a car just idling.

If your got high ron jap fuel and it doesn't ping maybe just leave it advanced.

If your keen to tinker, check the cam gears in relation to not only each other but in relation to the crank timing gear/TDC.

The only thing i can think of is a camshaft is out.

You said you have tried 3 timing lights already so it cant be that.

Every RB i play with, you can change the static timing anywhere from 10deg to 30deg and no real change in noise/note. When you add more timing it raises the idle a little (naturally) but other than that no real difference.

If you can get it to run like shit, by retarding the timing to 15deg btdc, something is wrong.

If it run like shit at 5deg btdc i would understand, but anywhere from 10deg btdc and up it should be very minimal the effect it has on a car just idling.

If your got high ron jap fuel and it doesn't ping maybe just leave it advanced.

If your keen to tinker, check the cam gears in relation to not only each other but in relation to the crank timing gear/TDC.

Yeah, I basically wanted to confirm my suspicions, the problem with buying these damned cars is you never know what's been done to them in the past. This is an RB25DET R32 conversion car and has all sorts of goodies in it, the ecu won't do diag mode tho and doesn't even have the led in the window. I'm camming it and swapping to a new turbo in about 10 days so I'll just eyeball the cam gears and hold off until the swaps and see if I can get it back to normal timing.

Thanks,

-Matt

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...