Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

this is probably been done b4...

i reckon:

fd rx7 - 7 deg front camber, slammed as low as it can, 410 hp good compromise

ae86 s.s. - 340hp same as rx7 above

and a much easier car to control drift, but not as brutally quick:

mr2 na - under 300hp, same susp setup as above

these are the best i found...

what else?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7209-best-drifters-in-gt3/
Share on other sites

best ive found for highspeed drift is the

For the RX7- Type X...

675BHP

SUSP:

-low as it goes

-high spring rate (Stiff)

-12 degree camber front

-4 degree camber rear

Tyres:

Front - Soft Racing

Rear - Hard Racing

Turn off the Traction control and that other anti-spin thing.

Same setup for most of the other cars too seems to work well...

  • 2 weeks later...

i found that you dont need to setup any car, just go to arcade mode, choose lets say the track "trial mountain" and pick the supra RZ, and remember to turn OFF the traction control and anti-spin bullshit in the options. The supra can tail it out preety well in stock form, the track is preety good aswell.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
×
×
  • Create New...