Jump to content
SAU Community

single or twin turbo for RB26


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

yeah was a nice run on SLICKS but the other two big singles i've seen have battled to say the least to get them off the line(no low down grunt or torque or rapid spool up in these examples) And one of the guys actual said he would have trade the power delivery of his single for what we were getting out of the small garret in and instant and as for see at the plex, yeah right i'll grow old and retirer before you put car where your mouth is?

I'm quite sure from what i saw it was on street tyres . And as for getting off the line and rapid spool i've seen yours bog off the line quite a number of times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

And the other big single turbo car you are talking about has a turbo 3 times the size of yours put together. We are talking properly matched singles here. ie.. gt35's , t60-1 etc etc

Sus the dyno graph. Not bad for a shitty single. As for that other dyno graph on the twins. Funny how its getting shown starting at 115kms. Nice way to show a big average power graph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND has a set of low-mount twins!!!

Try getting a power curve like that with a single!!!!

any reason why you didnt do it in shoot_6 mode instead of shoot_8

last time i checked an RB26 came with only 6 pistons :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have covered this before. A properly matched single BB turbocharger will always outperform any twin turbo variants of similar calibre both in response and outright power. You cant go against physics. There is a GTR with only a GT30 which makes +300rwkW and does a high 10 with better drivavbilty than nismo N1s by far. Please the person who owns this car speak out and pass on your experience of this brilliant car.

30 years ago yeah twin turbos were the go... not anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND has a set of low-mount twins!!!

Try getting a power curve like that with a single!!!!

466_9_dyno.JPG

hi

What turbos and boost are you running?

Is the bottom end still 2.6litre? can u tell me what other mods you have done?

thanks :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have covered this before. A properly matched single BB turbocharger will always outperform any twin turbo variants of similar calibre both in response and outright power. You cant go against physics. There is a GTR with only a GT30 which makes +300rwkW and does a high 10 with better drivavbilty than nismo N1s by far. Please the person who owns this car speak out and pass on your experience of this brilliant car.

30 years ago yeah twin turbos were the go... not anymore.

What are you talking about? The fluid dynamics behind it all say that one turbo per cylinder is the ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you talking about? The fluid dynamics behind it all say that one turbo per cylinder is the ideal.

Mik i got to agree with you from all the published documentation i have read multi turbo configurationhas been known to have a clear efficience edge over a single arrangement( due to in one part the clear exhaust signal)

And people just for a moment think about ever top of the range turbo charged performance car on the market i can think of nissan ,toyota, porsche are all multi turbo , And your trying to tell me they spend million of dollars on development to built some of the fast cars on the planet to built multi turbo cars ,to have only gone backward from the base model unit (ie gts to gtr)I DONE THINK SO.

ok the fast gtrs in world hks/veilside/gtr700/Keir wilson etc etc all twin

the best track gtrs in the world (other end of the scale "responce") all twins never seen the nissan racing team run a single turbo set up I WOUNDER WHY NOT , if what you say is true that single is best why would a team with hugh money resource and R&D backing not have gone to that configuration for an edge ,BECAUSE IT ISN'T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 years ago yeah twin turbos were the go... not anymore.

Poor Nissan, spending all that money on the RB26DETT when they could have listened to you and just stuck with the single turbo setup!

And the R32 GTR came out in 1989, which is only 15 years ago.

:bs!:

And clearly BMW engineers have no f*cking idea because they are developing a twin-turbo inline-6 setup:

BMW Twin turbo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best example I think is the

GT42R single making 1131 hp vs 2 x 3240's making 1073 hp

The 3240's are on a 3.4 litre engine, vs a 3litre engine.

And I am afraid the single turbo making more power on the samller engine comes on harder :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best example I think is the

GT42R single making 1131 hp vs 2 x 3240's making 1073 hp  

The 3240's are on a 3.4 litre engine, vs a 3litre engine.  

And I am afraid the single turbo making more power on the samller engine comes on harder :rolleyes:

I'm not calling you a liar, however you haven't explained why the engineers persist with the twin-turbo setup if it's a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not calling you a liar, however you haven't explained why the engineers persist with the twin-turbo setup if it's a waste of time.

There is one point we all miss here. We all are assuming manufactors make cars to be there best / fastest / most effecient.

Manufacturers dont make the best car the possibly can, they make cars that SELL and make money ......

Doesn't TWIN Turbo sound cool to the marketing department ?

Above that I dont truly know the answer to which is better. I just thought it nice to show some real world examples up for thought :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not calling you a liar, however you haven't explained why the engineers persist with the twin-turbo setup if it's a waste of time.

Yeah its not just not the engineers but also the company like HKS,TOMEI and APEXI top performance gtr's are twins aswell and if your going to talk hp what about Veilside 1400hp plus 2.6Litre gtrs on twin turbos but obvisiously these companys need to come listen to the aussie back yard experts cos there got it all wrong.

I surgest a few guy could benefit from reading a book by Gramham Bell called Forced Induction. It based on facts and on cars developed in F1 and WRC and the principles that have been developed in all areas of forced induction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch a few early HPI dvd's and see what sorta times the big singles are running on the gtr's . Yes the huge horsepower GTR's are running twins but thats due more to the fact that u cant get a single big enough to get the horsepower they want. Were talking street cars here not all out drag cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AND has a set of low-mount twins!!!

Try getting a power curve like that with a single!!!!

466_9_dyno.JPG

:werd: ...and this ,ladies and gentlemen,is why I'm going HKS 2530's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest two.06l
any reason why you didnt do it in shoot_6 mode instead of shoot_8

last time i checked an RB26 came with only 6 pistons :D

Did you care to notice the signature on the graph...it was in competition, so the run was performed under competition rules (not mine) Also there is not enough loading on the dyno in shoot6 for high powered vehicles...i.e. too much wheelspin in shoot6...all dyno comps use shoot8...i.e. everybody has the same dyno loading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • ^^What he said. The fuel pressure wants to be about 43 psi with just priming, or with the engine running but the reg sense line pulled off (and plugged to stop it being a vacuum leak). It should obviously be about 13 psi less than that with the engine running and the sense line connected, because that's going to be close to manifold vacuum. So, somewhere in the 30 psi territory. 45 is PSI is too much, and very likely wrong. It is remotely possible that that is the fuel pressure it was set to when it was tuned, if you have an adjustable reg, which I couldn't see. But I suspect that it is not correct, because it was showing very similar pressure at both prime and running. It looks like the sense line is disconnected or blocked (or the reg is stuff, or something else weird). The tacho fluctuating like that is either a fault with the tacho, the wiring from the ECU, or the ECU's own output. The engine was clearly not changing speed like the tacho was.
    • If your idle fuel pressure suddenly changed for any reason it would cause the problem you're seeing. Running rich is as bad as lean. The tachometer issue is likely a red herring. Pull the cluster out and resolder the joints to fix that one. You can also flow test your injectors.
    • Hey guys. I've got a rough idle issue on my R34 GTT RB30/25DET Neo. I've worked on my RB for years and this is the first time where I don't have a fkin clue why it's happening, its baffiling me.  Here's a video of it in action: Long story short: My daily R34 decided to randomly start doing this weird RPM idle fluctuation thing and it wants to die on me sometimes and I've got a higher than normal pressure in my fuel line before the fuel rail which I'm thinking can be contributing to this issue.     The long story:   This is my daily and the car has always performed really well for me up n till now.  It was tuned on haltech platinum pro (running on board map sensor) 4 months ago and did 440hp (on 98ron) and has been driving really well, no issues what so ever. Then one day (about a month ago) I came home from work, fuelled up, popped into the shops and then came back, got in the car to head home, started it and it started idling really rough. Like, I would start it and then it would instantly die on me. So I had to rev it to keep the engine alive and I had to baby it home. And it would also do this weird RPM fluctuations where the rpm needle on the cluster goes up fast then down fast like its glitching weirdly (can see on the video). Note: nothing has been changed on the engine since the tune nor has the ecu been plugged into anything since the tune. So this problem has occurred randomly and is still the same today. Also to note: this happened when the car was at full operating temp (was probably a 30 degree day). And the same idle issue will happen on cold starts. I've attached my complete list of mods here. I haven't been driving the car since. So I've plugged the haltech ecu into my laptop to check for any error codes, nothing. I let the engine idle and I watched the sensors on the haltech ecu manager, nothing odd, and no errors. Temps all look good. TPS voltage is good. I've got the haltech hooked up to a wide-band O2 sensor (pro sport gauge kit) and the afr starts off rich on cold start then eventually it goes to 14.2 like normal, so afr seems fine and normal to me. Since I've changed the spark plugs, it now won't die instanly on me but it still idles weirdly.  The weird thing is, the RPM on my cluster fluctuates up and down but the RPM on the haltech shows normal-ish (no fluctuations). Note: the video was taken after I have done all the checks below.   So here's the list of things that I've checked off and done on my list to try and eliminate possible causes: • Compression test: perfectly fine like it was before the tune (phew!😅). • Changed spark plugs to new ones: this helped a bit with the rough idle, old plugs were all black (they were about 3000kms old). • Did the old quick coil plug test by un-pluging one by one while engine is idling to hear for changes in rpm: rpm/idle changed as they should on each one. • Changed fuel filter: still the same. • Checked TPS sensor on haltech and it reads correcly. 0.45v no throttle and 4v WOT. • Cleaned IACV with a new gasket: nothing changed. • Swapped the IACV with another known working one: nothing changed. • Swapped CAS to a known working one. Nothing changed. • Unplugged the water temp sensor: I know it’s not this because when I unplug it, it would show some weird temp on the haltech software and when i plug it in it shows normal. • I've tried attaching the R35 PRP coil plug harness's ground cable to somewhere els on the head: nothing changed • I've tried putting a jumper lead on the negative battery terminal and then attaching it to the head and block to see if its a grounding issue: nothing changed.  • I've checked the timing marks on the cams and crank all line up. • Changed the fuel pump horn relay (constant 12v mod) to a new one: nothing changed. • I've taken my haltech ecu out and then tested it into my brother's r34 with his map to check if the ecu is still fine, and it is.   Now here's where it gets a bit interesting (and let me know if it's irrelevant); I checked the fuel pressure for the first time ever by tee'ing in a pressure gauge between the fuel filter and damper that enters into the fuel rail (can see on the video). When I prime the fuel pump, it goes to 43ish psi, which it should be according to the R34 workshop manual. Then when I go to start and idle the engine, it stays on 50psi. The workshop manual says that it should be about 32psi. So I immediately thought its my fuel pressure regulator and I changed it to a known working one. And still... it's idling at 50psi fuel pressure. When I take off the vac line on the FPR, nothing really changes. So then I changed the fuel damper that sits on the fuel rail to a known working one: still the same 50psi.  Then I hooked up a long hose onto the exit of the fuel rail straight to the fuel tank flap to see if there are any blockages: it dropped a little bit by 2psi... So no real restriction in the return line. So now Im wondering, if there might be a blockage in the fuel rail or my 640cc xspurt injectors are maybe blocked? 🤷‍♂️   The question I have is; is this fuel pressure on idle (50psi) normal for an RB that has a Walbro 225 fuel pump with the constant 12v mod, with upgraded injectors + standalone ecu on a stock fuel rail and stock fpr? And would this high pressure be my main culprit for my shithouse of an idle?    The other interesting thing I found/tested, was; i swapped out the cluster to my old stock nissan one to see if the RPM fluctuation thing also appears on that one, and it did the same thing weird RPM fluctuation on my old nissan cluster. So something weird electrically is going on that is contributing to this idle issue (maybe?). The fuel pressure also doesn’t seem normal, so I wanted to check in with you guys before i go pulling the fuel rail off (which is such a bitch to do!). What do you guys think this might be? Can I test some other stuff? Does the haltech platinum pro ecu have a diagnosing feature of electrical components that I can try? It can't be the tune/map because it ran perfectly fine for 3 months after the tune and no one has touched the map since.    The next thing I’m tempted to try is injector cleaner which I've never tried before. Can I pour it straight into the feeding fuel line instead of in the tank? Can injector cleaners damage stuff when not diluted in the tank? mod list.txt
    • I would never LS an R32 either. I do have truly evil thoughts about VK56s or the Toyo V12s out of New Zealand though. Very hard to justify for my daily....
    • Oh no. There's heaps. A whole lot of them are legitimately handling/installation problems. The material used in the L19 bolts is susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement and must be kept well oiled and not handled without gloves, etc etc. There have been many failures of these from people who didn't realise. There may also have been failures caused by conditions inside the engine (say, head gasket failures?) and people didn't realise that that was probably a death warrant. But that's the L19 material. The ARP 2000s are not made of the same stuff and are more forgiving. But from what I gather there have been occasions where the head has pulled off of one, and non-one can say that the installation was at fault (given good torque records), etc etc, but maybe just maybe the face of the rod shoulder where the bolt head sits wasn't actually perfectly square to the bore of the hole...and loaded up the head with a torque across it and.... ping! I've head stories of bolt heads being found in corners of workshops or in the bottom of sumps even without starting and running the engine! Trouble is, it is really hard to sort the true material failures from the handling/installation failures. It's worse than human medicine. You can only run the experiment once, and you can't run it backwards in time to look at the rod before it became a modern sculpture.
×
×
  • Create New...