Jump to content
SAU Community

Cars You have Owned So Far...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1. HD Holden sedan

2. HR Holden wagon

3. 80 Mazda 626

4. VH Holden Com

5. 95 Ford Falcon

6. 01 Mazda 323 Sp20 (still got)

7. 93 Nissan R33 GTST (still got)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. HD Holden sedan

2. HR Holden wagon

3. 80 Mazda 626

4. VH Holden Com

5. 95 Ford Falcon

6. 83 Toyota KE70 wagon

7. 01 Mazda 323 Sp20 (still got)

8. 93 Nissan R33 GTST (still got)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. - R31 GXE Skyline 87'

2. - R33 GTS-t Skyline S1.5 95'

.

.

.

Next ? --> GTR R32 or R33... still can't decide. I don't see myself driving anything else but a Skyline for quite sometime ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.1983 Mitsubishi Starion turbo (awesome car)

2. Ford Laser KB 1.5 auto. (bunky)

3.1983 Mazda 323 1.5 manual (bunky)

4. 1979 Toyota RA40 Celica 5 spd (rally bunky)

5. 1991 Nissan 180sx SR20DET 5spd. (awesome, ran 12s)sold.

6. 1993 Nissan Skyline GTS-T R32 with RB25DET conversion (Insane).sold

7. 2002 Toyota Camry Conquest. (Boring boring boring)Did I mention boring?

8. 1997 Nissan Skyline GTS-T R33 Series II. (see a pattern with the skylines ;))

Owned a few more crapheaps in the past as well not worth mentioning, ahh how I love the No roadworthies in WA, we used to buy cars for $100 bucks on the weekend and they would last for the week or more of our abuse!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1- 1989 Corolla SX

2- 1996 Commodore VS V6 (still in the family)

3- 1992 R32 GTST  

4- 1990 GTiR Pulsar

5- 1991 Cressida Grande (7MGTE, HKS T04E, etc)

6- 1990 Camira 2L EFI auto

7- 1924 R32 GT-R phantom edition

8- 1989 R31 5 speed

No.7 above - would that be the 'phantom edition' as it didn't exist in 1924???? :wassup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. '83 XE Falcon with the usual P-plater mods; exhaust, rims, suspension, tint & stereo. (roomy back seat ;) ) - 2 years.

2. '93 ED Fairmont with just about every N/A mod I could thinks of (loved that car until I lost my license :( ) - 4.5 years.

3. '94 R33 GTsT - Had for 6 months now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1999 - Subaru WRX

2001 - Mazda Series 6 RX7 Type R2

2003 - Nissan R33 GTR Vspec

Beefy – excellent choice of vehicles, let us know hpw the FD rotary compared!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Counted 37 that I can remember, not going to list them - A few of them, almost nobody would recognise the names............. like Essex,Bristol, Alvis, Lagonda..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Counted 37 that I can remember, not going to list them - A few of them, almost nobody would recognise the names............. like Essex,Bristol, Alvis, Lagonda..........

you had a lagonda? there worth a bit these days..fat slow 'ultra hi tech' :wassup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...