Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i couldnt wait so i installed the bleedvalve not long ago and took the car for a fang. initial impressions are that revs build up alot fast and smoother - dont know how, but most importantly it holds the pressure bloodly well. best $35 ive spent at this stage it beats my profec a ebc which needed to learn boost curves yaada yadaa. but with this one, its just straight on, set and drive. one happy chappy, cheers mark.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i just installed mine this arvo, went for a thrashing. i noticed when i stepped on the pedal (3rd gear) it pulled from 3'thou rpm to about 7'thou with no signs of boost drops or spikes. i didnt adjust it yet, as it came pre-adjusted and the reading on the boost guage was 0.7bar = 10ish psi?

anyways here a pic of the install as i noticed some people had difficulties determining what went here :unsure:

this bleedvalve is on a sr20 but i dont think it make a difference to what car it is. one line goes to actuator and the other goes to intake pipe.

post-1473-1128420587.jpg

so let me get this straight.....

With this controller you can only INCREASE boost......

The reason im asking is my R32 is running 13psi and this uses more fuel and creates more heat then i would want..... i want to put it on about 10 for the street and raise it for the track.....

Is this possible?

Cant you just use ur right foot to control boost? if u want two different settings i would suggest you get a different setup. Something with a high/low switch or something like that.

lol.. Use your foot, its not like the rb20det is known for its early boost build. :D

For the track you would want it the other way around.

Less boost for the track, more for the street.

Having a higher boost on the street is much much safer and creates much less heat than the lower boost would at the track.

Edited by Cubes

i wouldnt mind a hi low switch but i dont see any going for $35......

I dont mind a minute or so under the bonnet.....

Cubes... sorry to sound blunt but how is this so? higher boost creates less heat?? yet uses more petrol tho?

Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :D

Edited by Cubes
Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :)

You mean advanced ign. timing... ;)

Longer burn = more energy produced = more power = more heat !

Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

Improper timing - increase in EGT means retarded ignition, decrease means advanced ignition.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Edited by Cubes
Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Advancing the ign. will have the same effect, primarily on the internal combustion temperatures (a more direct effect than EGT). This is also why advancing your timing too much causes "pinging" (usually combined with lean AFR's).

I'd be less worried about retarded timing than advanced timing... EGT's wouldn't jump by a huge amount (although they would increase, as more fuel would be burning in the exhaust side)... i'd mainly worry about oxygen sensors and cats, which would die quicker as a result of the increased temps. I'd imagine the increase in charge temperature (being that the turbo would get a bit hotter) would be pretty small if you had a decent intercooler!

:(

Just my 2 cents... I see where you are coming from though.

So what is it then?

You would rather what? Tune lean run less ignition timing?

or tune a little richer and run more ignition timing?

I am talking about a whole package, not just playing with ignition timing or just with fuel.

Consider most hipo motors, how they are tuned.

They don't lean the suckers out and run stuff all ignition timing, they tend to run them richer and keep the ignition timing in there, especially around peak torque.

Obviously if you dial in too much fuel you will see egt temps climb due to what is known as afterburn. Its a balancing act, if you really hammer the car around the local track I would definitely consider investing in an egt temp guage. Its the only way to achieve the safest tune.

I should also mention the japs tend to tune a little richer and run a little more ignition timing in their drift cars.

I've done quite a bit of research in to the theory of tuning and feel I have quite a good idea what is going on.

A richer tune that allows a little more ignition timing is a safer tune.

EDIT: ESPECIALLY for ceramic turbine turbo's.

:(

Edited by Cubes

That makes alot of sense Cubes. Will take that into consideration when I get mine tuned. So instead of the usualy 11.8:1 - 12.1:1 AFR people are aiming at, if you have ignition control as well you reckon something like 11.5:1 with advancements in timing is better?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
    • New rear lights, filler panel sprayed, cleaned and back together    before, during, after shots 😍
×
×
  • Create New...