Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i couldnt wait so i installed the bleedvalve not long ago and took the car for a fang. initial impressions are that revs build up alot fast and smoother - dont know how, but most importantly it holds the pressure bloodly well. best $35 ive spent at this stage it beats my profec a ebc which needed to learn boost curves yaada yadaa. but with this one, its just straight on, set and drive. one happy chappy, cheers mark.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i just installed mine this arvo, went for a thrashing. i noticed when i stepped on the pedal (3rd gear) it pulled from 3'thou rpm to about 7'thou with no signs of boost drops or spikes. i didnt adjust it yet, as it came pre-adjusted and the reading on the boost guage was 0.7bar = 10ish psi?

anyways here a pic of the install as i noticed some people had difficulties determining what went here :unsure:

this bleedvalve is on a sr20 but i dont think it make a difference to what car it is. one line goes to actuator and the other goes to intake pipe.

post-1473-1128420587.jpg

so let me get this straight.....

With this controller you can only INCREASE boost......

The reason im asking is my R32 is running 13psi and this uses more fuel and creates more heat then i would want..... i want to put it on about 10 for the street and raise it for the track.....

Is this possible?

Cant you just use ur right foot to control boost? if u want two different settings i would suggest you get a different setup. Something with a high/low switch or something like that.

lol.. Use your foot, its not like the rb20det is known for its early boost build. :D

For the track you would want it the other way around.

Less boost for the track, more for the street.

Having a higher boost on the street is much much safer and creates much less heat than the lower boost would at the track.

Edited by Cubes

i wouldnt mind a hi low switch but i dont see any going for $35......

I dont mind a minute or so under the bonnet.....

Cubes... sorry to sound blunt but how is this so? higher boost creates less heat?? yet uses more petrol tho?

Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :D

Edited by Cubes
Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :)

You mean advanced ign. timing... ;)

Longer burn = more energy produced = more power = more heat !

Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

Improper timing - increase in EGT means retarded ignition, decrease means advanced ignition.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Edited by Cubes
Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Advancing the ign. will have the same effect, primarily on the internal combustion temperatures (a more direct effect than EGT). This is also why advancing your timing too much causes "pinging" (usually combined with lean AFR's).

I'd be less worried about retarded timing than advanced timing... EGT's wouldn't jump by a huge amount (although they would increase, as more fuel would be burning in the exhaust side)... i'd mainly worry about oxygen sensors and cats, which would die quicker as a result of the increased temps. I'd imagine the increase in charge temperature (being that the turbo would get a bit hotter) would be pretty small if you had a decent intercooler!

:(

Just my 2 cents... I see where you are coming from though.

So what is it then?

You would rather what? Tune lean run less ignition timing?

or tune a little richer and run more ignition timing?

I am talking about a whole package, not just playing with ignition timing or just with fuel.

Consider most hipo motors, how they are tuned.

They don't lean the suckers out and run stuff all ignition timing, they tend to run them richer and keep the ignition timing in there, especially around peak torque.

Obviously if you dial in too much fuel you will see egt temps climb due to what is known as afterburn. Its a balancing act, if you really hammer the car around the local track I would definitely consider investing in an egt temp guage. Its the only way to achieve the safest tune.

I should also mention the japs tend to tune a little richer and run a little more ignition timing in their drift cars.

I've done quite a bit of research in to the theory of tuning and feel I have quite a good idea what is going on.

A richer tune that allows a little more ignition timing is a safer tune.

EDIT: ESPECIALLY for ceramic turbine turbo's.

:(

Edited by Cubes

That makes alot of sense Cubes. Will take that into consideration when I get mine tuned. So instead of the usualy 11.8:1 - 12.1:1 AFR people are aiming at, if you have ignition control as well you reckon something like 11.5:1 with advancements in timing is better?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Should shit that in as for the driver ability probably not
    • Trying to find the plastic under cover for an 04' Forester X. The main under cover that covers most of the front of the vehicle under the engine. This has turned out to be a crazy experience. Normally I can find parts for vehicles, if I have the correct info, no problem. But not this! The Forester is a non-turbo btw. In a Forester parts catalog, for model years 03'-06', it shows part# 56410SA070 as being the correct part. So I go to the local Subaru dealership's website to order it. I type in the part#, hit search and there it is, the under cover. "DOES THIS PART FIT YOUR VEHICLE?" I type in my VIN# and sure enough, "This Part Does Not Fit Your Vehicle. See Similar Parts For Your Vehicle." I click on that and part# 56410SA000 comes up. Looks absolutely nothing like the previous part. Not even close. So I go to a different Subaru dealer website and put in that 2nd part# (56410SA000) and "This Part Has Been Replaced By" 56410SA070, which is the first part I looked up. I thought OK, makes sense. They replaced the strange looking part, with the one I looked up first, so I add it to the cart. "Does This Part Fit Your Vehicle?" I type in my VIN#, and sure enough, "This Part Does Not Fit Your Vehicle." I've basically been doing this with various parts suppliers and dealerships, for the past 4 hours! Does anyone know what the hell is going on?? Thanks in advance!   
    • have you rotated the car yet? if so how smooth was it?
    • And finally, I had the driver's side airbox off while adding a long drain hose under the oil can to down near the oil filter. Doesn't look good, it has definitely had an turbo oil seal leak and looks like it has been for a long time.....guess I'll have to get a pair of highflows to put on the shelf It's also worth mentioning it has a really strange clamp between the bottom of the airflow meter (which has a big barb/lip on it) and the intake pipe. I've used the magic of MSPaint to show, basically you have to clip out those 2 steel springs which unlocks the hose from the AFM. I used 2 flat screwdrivers, the spring sort of clips into the unlocked position. Reassembly you just pop them both back flat once the hose is far enough up the AFM that the spring clamp is above the barb. Weird to use but much more convenient once your'e used to it compared to trying to do up a hose clamp under the airbox like on 32 GTR
    • The other thing I started was a fire extinguisher bracket.  As with a few other cars previously (350z, Leaf), I'm going to add a bracket between the navigator seat's front bolts, then mount the extinguisher on that. Unfortunately Nissan (probably the same engineer who did the A/T fluid interwarmer) decided that the front seat brackets would be recessed and uneven so the bracket shape was a bit tricky; I ended up doing 1 part under each seat mount (the large hole is because there is a flange under the seat mount to allow for the carpet thickness)   and then a horizontal part between those 2 No final pic yet as the paint needs to dry, I'll post up once that's done  
×
×
  • Create New...