Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Standard coils by any chance????

nope just put in heavy duty dsr ones ae. before the boost controller went in. it runs mint on the standard soleniod and 9psi on bc but doesnt like anymore then that.

but my BOV doesnt work so i think theres a vacuum problem with my car. but still doesnt explain the boost tho....

it runs good otherwise. new plugs aswell. im just stumped on this issue now

Stock BOV???

Also some cars respond well to boost increase others need a remap

no its a after market bov but its mounted on the pipe after the j pipe so looking to go front mount and put it on the standard bracket instead. im gona get new poddie aswell and see if that helps. but ran it on 9psi last night and absolutely loved it. went hard on full boost by 3000rpm and pulled all the way. so i think it has somthing to do with a vac leak somewhere.

how do i re map it? do i just reset the ecu?

thanks for this help mate

Mate get rid of the bov and put the stock one back on this will most likely be your problem VTA BOV have known issues with RB engines there a pain most times

To re map

You could try and interupt and change the air flow pulse sent to the ecu using a SAFC or neo with a wide band so you dont go bang but has no way to advance the timing beyound standard ecu maps its not really a remap as such but is easy enough to do your self

or send the ecu away for generic stage 1 2 3 blar blar blar map simple plug and play but its generic

or get a custom remap from a tuner using a laptop to re flash the ecu on a dyno this would be set up for your car to get the best out of it with mods you have Ive seen good results from custom remaps but they can be expensive

The ecu reset is a good idea after any mod you do but it eventually learns any way as its always making fine adjustments and retarding or advancing the timing.

  • 1 month later...

Email the guys who make em and tell them you are a member here and they may give you a slightly better deal. I think they gave them to me for $29 delivered.

  • 2 months later...

Found this on ebay have been waiting 10 days for delivery so far... Hope she rocks up soon, getting anxious. Bit devo'd i found it on here afterwards, a cheaper price and express post would have been nice. Although from what i have read it'll be worth the wait :P

  • 2 weeks later...
Found this on ebay have been waiting 10 days for delivery so far... Hope she rocks up soon, getting anxious. Bit devo'd i found it on here afterwards, a cheaper price and express post would have been nice. Although from what i have read it'll be worth the wait :D

Was definitley worth the wait ;) Very happy

  • 4 weeks later...
I just jumped on to buy one!

BTW, what's in the box? Do they give enough hoses?

Anyone with a GTR here used it yet?

It's just the controller you don't need any hoses. There is a t piece (well an f piece on my r34 GTT) that you take out and replace with the boost controller there is a write up on how to do it very easy job.

I'm another happy customer with this product does it's job very nicely

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey all,

I just ordered one of these. Not so much to increase boost but more so boost characteristics (reading how it helps with lag and how it holds boost etc).

My car is a virtually stock standard RB20det. Standard turbo, exhaust and ecu but with a front mount and K&N apollo filter.

What I am thinking of doing is replacing the wastegate actuator with a spare (5psi max) actuator i have in the garage, and then controlling the max boost (probably will be wound back up to standard 10psi) with the turbotech.

Does this sound like a good idea? I figure it will allow me to run standard/safe boost levels but still have the benefits of the turbotech.

Yay or nay?

Cheers,

Mark

EDIT:

I just checked the actuator arm shape on the car at the moment and it's bent... the spare I have is straight.

Would an Rb25 7psi actuator be a direct fit on the rb20 turbo?

Edited by Guest
Hey all,

I just ordered one of these. Not so much to increase boost but more so boost characteristics (reading how it helps with lag and how it holds boost etc).

My car is a virtually stock standard RB20det. Standard turbo, exhaust and ecu but with a front mount and K&N apollo filter.

What I am thinking of doing is replacing the wastegate actuator with a spare (5psi max) actuator i have in the garage, and then controlling the max boost (probably will be wound back up to standard 10psi) with the turbotech.

Does this sound like a good idea? I figure it will allow me to run standard/safe boost levels but still have the benefits of the turbotech.

Yay or nay?

Cheers,

Mark

EDIT:

I just checked the actuator arm shape on the car at the moment and it's bent... the spare I have is straight.

Would an Rb25 7psi actuator be a direct fit on the rb20 turbo?

I'm using a RB20 10 PSI on my RB25 turbo (96 model) so I'd assume so.

I might actually have to fit this one day, been sitting in the car for two years.

Edited by Traditimeour
  • 1 year later...

Hi all Im a newbie and I have a question for ya

If i wanted higher boost but only later in the rev range I would be better off with a turbosmart boost controller correct? as the turbo tech one builds boost sooner?

Edited by Kram

I can't beleive this thread has been revived again.

And am I understanding you correctly, you want MORE lag??!!

Hi all Im a newbie and I have a question for ya

If i wanted higher boost but only later in the rev range I would be better off with a turbosmart boost controller correct? as the turbo tech one builds boost sooner?

Hi all Im a newbie and I have a question for ya

If i wanted higher boost but only later in the rev range I would be better off with a turbosmart boost controller correct? as the turbo tech one builds boost sooner?

You would be better off not getting a controller and sticking with the stock one

Pretty sure it has like 5psi up to 4000 rpm then goes to 7.

Why not the whole way through the range?

Wouldnt you rather this thread got dug up rather than having a new one started every 3 months?

I am happy with the low down power of the vehicle as it is my auto 4 door family car. 5psi to 4000prm is fine, i just want more like 10-12 psi from 4000rpm up!

  • 2 weeks later...

I tried one of the new turbotech. it's called V2.

It uses a different type of ball bearing. It's soft-ish (not really soft) externally, but still very hard. Not metal.

He explained it all to me at the time. But basically it seals much better, and weighs less too, so responds quicker to the pressures applied.

The internal machining/tolerances of the main body seem more precise too.

I went from the original turbotech, which i had for quite some time, and was happy with, to using the new version about 1 year ago.

It seems like it spools up even quicker.

In my case, it overshoots by barely a couple of psi on WOT, but then settles quickly and holds steady. personally i like it this way. A bit of extra boost early on never hurts :)

Although i suspect the overboost is caused by my 10 psi actuator, which i installed around the same time. it's pretty tight and caused overboost with the original turbotech too.

Overall, i'm very happy with the V2. It hasnt given me any probs since i installed it. Basically set and forget.

This is the one:

$%28KGrHqUOKpgE5Y37EZ35BObbqlPO8w~~60_12.JPG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...