Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On a day of crazy fast times and cars your effort was execptional Brisby. Well done.

I still can't believe I ran a 1.22.2 and that it was only good enough for the 7th fastest time of the day. That's a seriously quick group of cars out there.

But anyways I'm exhausted and I need to go find a beer.

Well what can I say, a day full of excitement and dissapointment, it just wasn't my day... After 5 attempts the intercooler piping was just not holding full boost in fourth gear, resulting in 1 complete timed lap of 1:29.... I wanted to leave at the end of the day with a sub 1:30, so I guess that's something to be proud of...

Full congrats to Roy, stepped up to the challenge and delivered the goods... WELL DONE TROY!!!! Hopefully next outing at Sandown I'll be able to match the time....

Gareth (Rowdy R32), brings a tear to the eye seeing your car after the crash, you walked away unscathed so I guess that's all that matters.....

Snowy, good to see you improved on your previous time...

I must give out a big thank you to Andrew (ferni) and Denton (DentonR33??) for their help in trying to sort out the intercooler piping issue, Cheers guys, really appreciate it!!!

And to all the rest of the SAU clan, good to see you all out there supporting us TEAM WANGERS!!!!

Looking forward to the next one!!!

On a day of crazy fast times and cars your effort was execptional Brisby. Well done.

I still can't believe I ran a 1.22.2 and that it was only good enough for the 7th fastest time of the day. That's a seriously quick group of cars out there.

But anyways I'm exhausted and I need to go find a beer.

how'd the new brake setup go?

Great to see the team going so well. Was nice to drop in and say hi. Great time Troy, and I trust the car made it through the day unscathed. Is this a new watershed? 58Y finished a track day?

Gareth, condolences on the wall incident, but consider the fun of rebuilding :)

So what were the critical lap times?

Did Benno stave off the assault from that nice white GTR32?

As far as I know:

Me - 1:29 (1 timed lap for the whole day, retired early)

INASNT - 1:33

Roy -1:25

Snowy - 1:22

wwwrrxxx - 1:22

Frank - 1:20 (retired early)

RPMGTR - 1:17

Correct me if I'm wrong....

Not sure of Ant95GTR and any other TEAM WANGERS.....

Chris pulled a 1.23 before the gearbox lunched itself.  I would have put bucks on 22s.  

I think it is time to change my user name..

Took me about 10 minutes to get used to my clutch again Jack..

Oh yeah, forgot all about Chris!!! Aaron, very impressive time considering you have bugger all mods on your car, must be the driver!!!!

Yeah clutch is a bit aggressive, good for holding the power though.....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Everyone is too used to learning from places like HPA "how to tune" and what to expect at what point, rather than being able to see "The computer says I'm in cell with Row = 8, column =4, and I can see my fuel is lean, so lets add more" Everyone wants "real units", which helps for someone picking it up for the first time and seeing how bad the tune is if they're not used to touching it.   However, I think for most of us who want to play with it, you're 100% right, we're only needing to learn about it for OUR CAR. Which makes it great, and we don't need to care what the real values are, we just need to know which cell it is, that's causing the lean or rich point, or that we want more ignition timing or less. But again, everyone wants everything super you beaut and nearly self tuning, with VE maps, and a billion compensations...   Though then there's me over here when I'm doing reverse engineering work just reading data in hex format that most people couldn't work anything out from. Yet I can see what's going on.
    • Um. No. Since Matt introduced the TIM it has become a lot easier to deal with the consequences of changing K for AFM and injector swaps. Then, tuning is a f**king doddle. No-one needs to know or care how many grams of air are flowing or any other bullshit. Need more fuel in a cell? Add more fuel. Need more timing in a cell. Add more timing. Need to adjust any of the other tables for warm up and so on? No harder than anything else. Sure - it's not an ECU system for starting from scratch on an arbitrary engine. But then.....it was never supposed to be, not recommended for, and almost never used that way. So.... On your engine, in particular, Nistune/Nissan OEM is about as sophisticated and difficult as banging 2 rocks together. Those ECUs are primitive and simple. There is nothing difficult there. I learnt Nistune from scratch, created new maps with extended axes, interpolated/extrapolated the original maps onto them and tuned my RB20 (basically the same ECU as your 26 ECU) all by myself, more than 20 years ago. And that was long before even TIM.
×
×
  • Create New...