Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone on this forum got any experience in Garrett VNT turbos? Is anyone running them? Looks like the perfect way to match a turbine to engine speed/load.

http://turbotech.com.au/garrett4.htm

http://www.honeywell.com/sites/ts/tt/turbo...ts_VNTworks.htm

http://www.honeywell.com/sites/ts/tt/Passe...12155701757.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73769-garrett-variable-nozzle-turbines/
Share on other sites

VATN or variable area turbine nozzle technology has been around for a while mainly used with Diesels . The housings and vanes are expensive to produce (high temp materials expensive) and the higher exhaust gas temperatures of petrol engines cause reliability problems .

The theory is that a variable area radius ratio will give less turbine inlet pressure in relation to boost pressure so there is less restriction to gas flow through the engine .

An American firm Aerocharger did market them for a while but they seem to have disappeared . Corky Bell talks about them , and a lot of forced induction theory , in his book Maximum Boost . I'd really like to see an update to his book with todays more modern turbos etc .

Cheers A .

I've read that book by Corky Bell. It's not bad, but as you said, would be alot better with current technologies written into it.

I'm currently reading "Turbochargers" by Hugh MacInnes. It's a pretty good technical book on matching turbines, housings, compressors ect. I'd definitely recommend it.

Shame the VNT turbos aren't used a little more. I'm also a little surprised as Garrett seem to offer this on their GT series turbos. I'm defintiely going to look into it as it seems like such a good solution if serviced properly to provide the reliability required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This would be a new pump with new gears. I'm just unclear on whether it's a good idea to run more oil pump flow if you don't actually need said flow. Oil level is set a minute or so after shutting off a warm engine so wouldn't the high RPM oil level in the sump end up lower all things equal? Plan is OEM clearances, main concern in my mind is whether the OEM pump can keep up with the flow requirements of any additional oil coolers.
    • Don't do what I did, use a 300000km old housing with billet gears. The old pump probably was clearanced with saw dust, Edward Lee's special engine treatment sauce and a good odo wind back. I had oil pressure issues, then replaces pump with new housing, new billet gears and 2x track day later binned a motor due to other oil related issues due to a previous engine builder. Long story short, buy a M2 or 3 or 4 N55/S55/S58 and enjoy life.
    • Yeah. "New pump" does not have to mean "massive pump".
    • Well, can you still get an OEM pump, and by the time you're buying a Nismo/N1 etc, just buy another aftermarket pump. It's better to have the pump able to flow more if its needed, than for your pressure to drop off. At any point in time, you're replacing the oil pump in a rebuild. Aftermarket pumps are likely going to be a better economical choice, and they don't have any negatives, even if they can flow more.   Also, when you're saying "replace the pump gears" are you meaning leave a 25+ year old housing in the engine with unknown wear, and just put new gears in? As that sounds silly to me, especially if you do have that minute amount of wear, that means your new pump gears now have a little bit more clearance beside them, which means, whelp, you may not get to build a lot of oil pressure or make a lot of flow.
    • Right, but if you replace the pump gears + put a spline or sine drive gear on the crank on a Nismo/OEM/N1/etc pump at that point do you really still want more flow/oil pressure? Let's say this is a the aforementioned "keep it simple" build, no more than ~400 kW at the crank.
×
×
  • Create New...