Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

True.... But the retarded timing on the inlet cam should be left up to the ecu and the vvt to do. If you start messing with the standard timing and the exhaust timing this is enough. Little lone messing with the already variable inlet cam.....

You would have to disable vvt to use it properly. This would be fine if all you wanted was power or torque... VVT allows the car to have both....

I am tossing around the idea of giving this a try. The VVT advances the inlet camshaft timing, but maybe not enough. Remember it is primarlily an emissions device, so they can meet the standards and still make good power. What if the engine would make more power with more advance, but then not pass the emissions requirements? Emissions wins, power looses every time.

It is not simply VVT ---- OR ---- adjustable inlet camshaft timing

You can have both, a win win is possible

:P

  • 4 weeks later...

And now SK has the requried adjustment pulley adaptor thingo to try it........ :)

An adjustable thingo made 20rwkW jsut recently on 245rwkW car.

brought the power curve left quite a bit, top end power the same, just making the same power earlier.

BASS OUT

Great thread,

I have a couple of questions;

1) What method do you use to hold flywheel still when removing main crank pulley bolt?

2) How do you fit a rattle gun on main pulley bolt with radiator etc in the way? (or do you remove to gain access?)

Thankyou

1. Didn't need to hold the crank, the rattle gun undid the bolt easily against the compression.

2. You have to remove the radiator and move the air con heat exchanger foreward a little. I used a piece of aluminium (100mm X 100mm X 3mm thick) to protect the air con heat exchanger core from the back of the rattle gun. Damages the fins otherwise.

:P cheers :)

  • 3 weeks later...

SK - great thread, especially interesting for someone who's stagea is approaching 94,000 k's.

One thing, doesnt retarding the exhaust cam increase valve overlap ? I usually advance the exhaust cam if I want reduced overlap (without affecting midrange as much as retarding the inlet), such as when you're approaching the choke flow limit of the turbine and exhaust gas pressure exceeds boost pressure.

In a 4 stroke IC motor, the first valve to open after TDC is the exhaust, followed by the inlet, so if the exhaust valve timing is retarded, this must increase overlap unless the inlet is retarded too.

Hi SK,

What is the theory behind retarding the cam shaft timing?

Where are you looking for power increases, low, mid high RPM?

Cheers

Rob

Hi Rob, by retarding the exhaust camshaft timing I am aiming for more mid range, but I can get a bit of top end as well. There is also some faster spooling to gained as well. What it achieves is more complete combustion, before the exhaust valves open. Plus you get slightly higher combustion pressure, for more torque.

You don't get something for nothing though, it also means you get less overlap, the inlet valve isn't open at the same time as the exhaust valve for as long. This means the incoming inlet charge (air and fuel) doesn't help push the exhaust out. This is why it works well with a bit of extra boost (above standard) as that offsets the shorter "push" time.

It's not quite a win/win, but there isn't much downside:cheers:

Edited by Ben D
SK - great thread, especially interesting for someone who's stagea is approaching 94,000 k's.

One thing, doesnt retarding the exhaust cam increase valve overlap ?  I usually advance the exhaust cam if I want reduced overlap (without affecting midrange as much as retarding the inlet), such as when you're approaching the choke flow limit of the turbine and exhaust gas pressure exceeds boost pressure.

In a 4 stroke IC motor, the first valve to open after TDC is the exhaust, followed by the inlet, so if the exhaust valve timing is retarded, this must increase overlap unless the inlet is retarded too.

Hi Ben, what you have said is correct, overlap is simply the amount of time the 4 valves (2 inlet and 2 exhaust) are open at the same time. That'll teach me to type things in a hurry.

:D cheers :O

Edited by Sydneykid
Should i bother and buy an inlet cam cam gear in addition to exhaust cam gear?

You can't, Stagea RB25DET's have VVT on the inlet camshaft, so there is no adjustable pulley available. Bass Junky does have an adaptor ring on a Group Buy that enables you change the inlet camshaft timing and still retain the VVT. I have one but I haven't fitted it yet. But a coupe of the guys with R33GTST RB25DET's have and they report good results.

:) cheers :)

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

i will be doing this to an engine on a stand before i put it into my car in the near future. as it wont be in the car running, i won't be able to check the timing before and after, however it does mean i will be able to get a good clear view of all the markings. one would assume that if they all lined up, the timing would be correct, correct?

i will be doing this to an engine on a stand before i put it into my car in the near future.  as it wont be in the car running, i won't be able to check the timing before and after, however it does mean i will be able to get a good clear view of all the markings.  one would assume that if they all lined up, the timing would be correct, correct?

Ah no, you don't know where the ignition timing is now so you can't put it back to where it was. If you put the CAS back in the same postion with the exhaust camshaft retarded say 4 degrees, then the igntion timing will be retarded 4 degrees as well. This is not really a problem, just remembr to set the ignition timing as soon as the engine is running.

:) cheerrs :)

Did my belt recently at 98,000 KM. Checked ignition timing before I took everything apart, the timing was around 20 degrees BTDC at 700 rpm (as SK said, probably the factory setting for the auto). Did the belt (took out radiator and starter motor, used a stop on the flexplate ring gear so I could loosen the front crank pulley with hand tools (no rattle guns here ;) and used a bearing puller to get the pulley off). All the bearings, tensioners etc were perfect, as was water pump, just put the new belt in (kept the stock cam gears), tied everything back up, and reset the timing with an additional 2 degrees advance (22 BTDC at 700 rpm).

The car has picked up response, midrange power and also fuel economy. I put it down to the slightly increased valve overlap going back to a new cam belt (even with stock cam wheels), and the extra couple of degrees ignition advance, which I can run together with a jaycar fuel adjuster because I run this puppy on 98 RON and only at 8 psi boost. Last tank, got 450 km from 47 L (still 1/4 tank left), thats 10.4 km/L. Better than buying shares in BP or mobil. Moral: for stageas with >85 K km, do your cambelt and pick up the hidden performance benefits !

Ah no, you don't know where the ignition timing is now so you can't put it back to where it was.  If you put the CAS back in the same postion with the exhaust camshaft retarded say 4 degrees, then the igntion timing will be retarded 4 degrees as well.  This is not really a problem, just remembr to set the ignition timing as soon as the engine is running.

:P cheerrs :(

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
have you got any dyno results yet sk, i'll b e tuning mine soon and i'll post up the results'

p.s i always use a punch bar on the crank pulley bolt so i don't have to touch the condenser.

I haven't changed the exhaust system yet, but soon, as there is Magic cat (from the Group Buy) on the way. So that should push me into finishing it.

I couldn't use anything but the rattle gun as the crank would turn and being an auto I couldn't lock it in gear like a manual.

:) cheers :)

I'm awating that group buy then sk...

The Magic cat Group Buy is still open I think, check out the Group Buy section. I sent Magic a sample cat so that they could make bolt ons. Spend $260 and a few days later the cat arrives, jack up the Stagea, undo 4 bolts (and the cat overheat sensor if it is still there) and swap them over. The longest part of the job is the jacking up and placing of the stands.

Except I have to swap the exhaust (cat back) at the same time, that will slow me down some.

:( cheers :

Edited by Sydneykid
Hey if you give them a call and mention the group buy, or go in and mention the group buy as long as its soon they will look after you.

Edited by Sydneykid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
    • It does when you start adding everything else in. But it's not just compute. It's the logic. Getting your timing right (I'm not meaning ignition timing for the engine). Making sure of your memory mappings, seeing your interrupts. Microcontroller devices only have so much capacity. For the most part, you want all those timers and interrupts in use on your engine control, which means you're left with less than ideal methods for timing and management of other control functions.   Let's put it this way, my job is all about building custom hardware, that goes into cars, and integrates with them. We're also waiting on a media confirmation from SpaceX too fora world first we've just completed with them in NZ too. It's not just the little toys I play with. But you know, you can think and believe what you want.
    • I don't think it's a good buy, the trend looks bad     lol.
×
×
  • Create New...