Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Spewin I had to work. Would love to have seen Mick run...And myself to...

Um, just checked the track times for the Sprint Track... ARe those times correct for all the categories?

Cause I've ran a fastest of 1:07.02 "DRY" street trim with SC fitted & 1:19.48 "WET" street trim and NA.

All in my humble R31 GTS1.... Surley I can't be mixing it with the turbo cars with boost and mods etc etc....I realise the "hand clicking" timing to..

Heres a easier one to read for the wet weather ones

(Wet) TRACK: Qld Raceway Sprint

GTR Class:

1:08.30, R33, jlNewton

GTS Class:

1:14.29, R33, SirSkyline

1:15.41, R32, nf.

1:16.10, R32, predator

1:16.68, R33, Toy33

1:20.30, R33, JCMarshall_Law

1:21.99, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

***********

TRACK: Qld Raceway Clubman

GTR Class:

1:14.60, R33, jlNewton

GTS Class:

1:17.46, R33, SirSkyline

1:18.58, R32, nf.

1:20.55, R33, Toy33

1:20.66, R31, predator

1:23.13, R33, JCMarshall_Law

1:23.76, R33, Mr.R33

EVO Class:

************

TRACK: Qld Raceway National Circuit

GTR Class:

************

GTS Class:

************

EVO Class:

************

Edited by SirSkyline
Spewin I had to work. Would love to have seen Mick run...And myself to...

Um, just checked the track times for the Sprint Track... ARe those times correct for all the categories?

Cause I've ran a fastest of 1:07.02 "DRY" street trim with SC fitted  & 1:19.48 "WET" street trim and NA.

All in my humble R31 GTS1.... Surley I can't be mixing it with the turbo cars with boost and mods etc etc....I realise the "hand clicking" timing to..

Thats about right. I ran consistant low 1:04s in my old GTST on the sprint layout with just a cat-back exhaust, pod filter, stock boost and Yokohama A539s 235/45 R17, in the dry of course.... Might bring the 33 sedan out for the next one too, see what it can do, That will keep me busy for the day :(

svd001: I think JCMarshall_Law meant real as in the guy hand clicking didn't make a mistake.

SirSkyline: Yea ok, you were after the result order rather than just the times. The reason I didn't do that is that "Wet" track can mean so many different things, like "constant rain" or "rained earlier but the line is drying" or "its raining so hard I cannot see".

Did all you guys collect your end of day time sheet before leaving ?

On the front page I've got Old Toy33 (GTS) and New Toy33 (GTR)

nf, if you mean the end of day sheet with all your laps, a graph of your performance and everyone else in rank order etc (the one jlnewton is referring too) , I printed them but not everyone collected them. If you want I'll post it out. Just PM me a mailing address.

Paul

  • 2 weeks later...

AzzurrA, sorry not trying to appear to have 'l337' group, its just our times are done electronically to 1/100th sec. Whereas the normal times at Sprints are timed by hand (see posts above for full details). So the times kept in this thread are accurate results.

Paul

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you want to do a single throttle body conversion easily, you won't need to pull anything apart. Take the linkage from your throttle off the linkage controlling the ITBs. Now open the ITBs wide open, and lock the linkages in said position. Now add a single throttle body onto the front of your inlet plenum. No it's not ideal for the last nth of a kw, but it'll be a lot better than what you're already trying to do...   PS, ITBs can be so damn hard to tune from, because roughly 20% movement in a throttle body equates to a change in roughly 80% of its flow (Hence power). When you add up the flow limitations of those small throttle bodys, it is a LOT higher than that of a single large throttle. Hence, TPS is very very sensitive with them, and you do a LOT of work with sensor fusion, and some Maths behind the scenes to make those blends nice, and be smooth.
    • Yep, when Haltech purchased Adaptronic, and all of the Adaptronic staff, including Andy went with it, it took Haltech to the next level. Haltech wanted Adaptronic as they wanted things like Andy's fuel models, and some other IP, AND they wanted Andy too as he is brilliant! Andy has spoken about the incompatibilities between the old 1500 stuff vs Nexxus, and it totally makes sense. It's not JUST software that is different, there is huge changes in the underlying hardware too. It's why Haltech has had soooo many changes in the last couple of years, in terms of Hardware, and Software, and why it has become so damn Amazing. Why do you think guys like Rob Dahm with his quad rotor, went from running Adaptronic's to running Haltechs? Andy. Pretty much, Haltech these days, is Adaptronic, but with more funds behind it, and more staff, and hence Andy's visions, and visions of other people that he helps shape their great visions, into amazing new products. All the new Nexxus gear, whole new software for it, new and better dashboards, the apps that will run on headunits and NOT be slow to respond! I understand people being burnt in the past, but if you're ragging on a company, about products and issues from many years ago, it's more a reflection on yourself, not looking or keeping up with new stuff. In which case, those people should be going back to PowerFC and Nistunes as the ECU's to rave on about...
    • Right, but I thought the problem has been for a while now that even if you know manifold pressure + throttle position you still have non-linearity and aliasing issues vs actual engine load? One way I can see things simplifying is going DBW, then all air going into the engine is represented by the throttle position. As opposed to a random bimetallic strip vaguely linked to engine temperature opening and closing a shutter or some random power steering air valve suddenly allowing a bunch of bypass air. But the same throttle position/RPM at ~atmospheric MAP in different gears is not guaranteed to be same engine load? Honestly, ITBs are of such dubious value IMO. I don't know why these things are hyped up so much. The main benefit as far as I can tell is you reduce the likelihood of cross-cylinder EGR scavenging with significant cam overlap at idle. I would absolutely run speed density and be done with it if not for this fairly esoteric control problem.
    • Hah dont worry, my adult brain has this conversation every single day. Dont waste your money, invest more of it into shares, pay down the mortgage. Then the bedtime insta doom scrolling begins and after being bombarded with gtr's my mind is set: im definitely getting one! I have the current model mx5 as the weekender, but i just miss my boost and literally like your username, the sututu's that come with it. I remember with my 2nd supra, as it had twins and vvti, they used to spool real early, like 1,500rpm so you could just be a spooly boy all day long. Some people say they get over it after a while, not me tho. 
    • If you need to refinance your mortgage and reset the loan terms back to 30 years and cash out on your equity for "investment" purposes *cough* car parts, I can help 😊
×
×
  • Create New...