Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have noticed on my R33 that once I am over around 90k's the steering is very heavy, even on gradual bends. I am running 235's on the front, but while stationary the power steering is light.

I assume the R33 has speed sensitive steering, does anyone know if its programmable? It just seems WAAAY too heavy around 90-110 for high speed cornering ( I guess its calibarated for skinnier tyres really).

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7413-power-steering-speed-sensitive/
Share on other sites

I thought at about 60km/hr the HICAS should kick in and cause the rear wheel to act in sympathy with the front, providing a 4WS situation. After checking alignment etc, check you have sufficient power steering fluid, not enough will make it feel heavy, but you would expect this to be all of the time.

See'ya:burnout:

but is the steering speed sensitive (eg reduces the power steering assistance as you speed up so its not too light at freeway speeds) ?

Slayer,

Yes, I believe that it works this way, otherwise it would be too flighty at high speed. Have you driven any other GTS-t's to compare it to. Your steering may be heavier all of the time, but it might be more noticable at high speed. I'd still suggest checking alignment and power steering fluid.

See'ya :burnout:

I just got Bridgestone Potenza G3's put on all 4, and I was getting the alignment done and they said there is a problem with the alignment in the passenger side rear, they had to keep it on a slight negative camber... He said it may have been bumped into a curb in Japan or something, and this could inturn affect high speed cornering. He recommended the best thing for me to do was speak to whiteline about a bush kit which may fix the problem up a bit...dunno, will c

Paul Paul

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
×
×
  • Create New...