Jump to content
SAU Community

injector upgrades


akira
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if anyone has replaced their injectors and fuel rail from side feed 2 top feed?

I've heard that Mazda 13B s6 injectors and a custom fuel rail can be modified 2 fit the RB25.

Does anyone know any more about injector upgrades?

Does it work out cheaper than aftermarket rb25 injectors etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Akira,

I have been looking at getting either Nismo or Sard injectors when i upgrade my turbo and increase the boost.

Sard injectors are dearer although i might grab some while im in Japan next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Akira,

Mark at Hills is sourcing me some 680cc injectors (brand new ones) I can't think of the brand or price off the top of my head, but when i go to see him next week re. my new turbo, i will get some details for you.

i need a phat fuel pump too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet, I have no idea what brand half the stuff on my car is .... although my fuel pump makes a cool "bbrrrrrrrrrrrrbepp" noise on startup :P I'm hoping to use Mark's services for a few things in early July, do you think for a price he'd be able ot show me where half the aftermarket mods on my car are and what type they are etc ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimbo,

Please give me a PM Re: 550cc injectors. R they side feed or top feed?

Prank,

I,m currently upgrading my fuel pump 2 a GTR internal item. Can always add external pump and surge tank later if required, but GTR pump is doing fine on current set up.

What fuel pump do U intend 2 run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prank.

I was going to run something like a bosch motorsport unit in my car although my friend uses a HKS Pump which he believes is around 100-200 extra.

Meggala: thanks for the info about the 33's i always thought that anything over 200kw was requiring some fuel system upgrades.

I plan to do my injectors and pump when i fit my turbo...

Decisions decisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...