Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

g'day

i have a question about "dyno dynamics" dyno's and their settings...

i have seen that the intake temp is the main setting that seems to vary from graph to graph when different people put their power figures up

so my question is...

what would the power difference be for a car run with an intake temp of 14deg versus an intake temp of 30deg on the settings? (assuming everything else is constant...)

would this be significant, or just a couple of killowatts?

obviously its not an issue, i was just thinking...

(its almost exam time so i have plenty of time on my hands and will do anything to procrastinate!)

cheers,

Warren.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/74943-dyno-settings-query/
Share on other sites

Shoot Out Mode (SOM) compensates for temperature differences. So a guy in Tasmania in winter should get the same power if he was in Cairns in summer.

The old rule used to be 5% change in power for every 8 degrees change in temperature. I have no idea what DD apply for SOM correction.:P

it makes a difference on a turbo car is the sensor is in the engine bay as the sensor see's...

eg: 50 degrees due to a pod and no CAI... but then it goes through an I/C on a turbo car so the car is actually seeing a different temp and shootout is applying a correction that isnt quite correct.

Its different for an N/A car.

I've seen a 10-15rwkw difference in my car using shootout with the sensor inside, and outside the engine bay.

reason i asked is that when i got my car dynoed it was about 15deg outside, and the temp was measured at the intake manifold, so the real temp getting to the cylinders

but on dyno days i see them placed at the air filter and temps of 30deg

so let me rephrase my question...

- dyno in shootout mode

- car in same workshop, same day, same time of day

- car gets power measured with IT set to 15

- then car gets power measured with TI set to 30

same figure?

reason i asked is that when i got my car dynoed it was about 15deg outside, and the temp was measured at the intake manifold, so the real temp getting to the cylinders

but on dyno days i see them placed at the air filter and temps of 30deg

so let me rephrase my question...

- dyno in shootout mode

- car in same workshop, same day, same time of day

- car gets power measured with IT set to 15

- then car gets power measured with TI set to 30

same figure?

Use the 8 degrees = 5% rule of thumb.

Need more info though....

1. What is the ambient temperature (AT)?

2. What is the rwkw reading at the 15 degrees Inlet Temperature (IT)

:(

Interesting question this, was trying to apply this theory to two.60l's thread where she made 466 rwkws in shoutout (8) mode, but when asked to provide a graph in non shootout mode the reply was "there's no difference".. WTF??

Anyway as an example my car made 335rwkws (Racepace dyno dynamics), and then backed up with 360rwkws in shootout mode!!!!

Haven't got a printout of the 360rwkw (shootout mode) run, so sorry can't compare temp readings...

Although next week i'm getting poncams installed and a retune so I'll get Ben to do a run in shootout mode aswell as normal mode... STAY TUNED!!!

Interesting question this, was trying to apply this theory to two.60l's thread where she made 466 rwkws in shoutout (8) mode, but when asked to provide a graph in non shootout mode the reply was "there's no difference".. WTF??

That could be true, if the Ambient Temperature and the Inlet Temperature are at the temperature that DD have selected as their "reference temperature".

Anyway as an example my car made 335rwkws (Racepace dyno dynamics), and then backed up with 360rwkws in shootout mode!!!!

That's normal, and precisely what I would expect if the Ambient and Inlet Temps are hotter than the "reference temperature". It is exactly the same as dynoing your car in summer (335 rwkw) and then again in winter (360 rwkw).

Although next week i'm getting poncams installed and a retune so I'll get Ben to do a run in shootout mode aswell as normal mode... STAY TUNED!!!

That should be interesting:cheers:

Use the 8 degrees = 5% rule of thumb.

Need more info though....

1. What is the ambient temperature (AT)?

2. What is the rwkw reading at the 15 degrees Inlet Temperature (IT)  

:rofl:

1. the ambient temp was about 15deg

2. the car made 132rwkw at 14deg inlet temp

if its 15deg outside, even with a FMIC surely i could not be seeing 15deg at the inlet manifold? would have thought realistically the inlet air would have been about 20deg

but if i were at a dyno day instead of having booked tine on the dyno the probe would be elsewhere and definately not measuring 14deg... maybe the probe wasn't even hooked up? and it was jsut set at 14deg?

hmmmm

1. the ambient temp was about 15deg

2. the car made 132rwkw at 14deg inlet temp

if its 15deg outside, even with a FMIC surely i could not be seeing 15deg at the inlet manifold?  would have thought realistically the inlet air would have been about 20deg

but if i were at a dyno day instead of having booked tine on the dyno the probe would be elsewhere and definately not measuring 14deg... maybe the probe wasn't even hooked up? and it was jsut set at 14deg?

hmmmm

Thats the problem with dyno days sometimes they dont take the time to set the cars up properly as it takes longer between runs.

But unless the all the sensors are in the correct positions ect. the results mean nothing.

Example

Ice performance Dyno 195 rwkw

All sensors in correct positions ect. 22 deg day in shootout mode.

Local Dyno comp 156rwkw

no sensors in airbox, no fans infront of the cars, 40 deg day, no shootout mode

car ran great no pinging at all.

Shoot out has some pretty generous enertia values (esp shoot 8), hence the higher numbers. Intake temp is also corrected back to 20C, so placing the sensor in behind the rad will give a substantial 'improvement ' also.

We like to use ambient air for Intake temp and 0 enertia. When done in this manner, the cars perform as per the hp calculators. When using shoot numbers, the cars underperform........

Shoot out has some pretty generous enertia values (esp shoot 8), hence the higher numbers. Intake temp is also corrected back to 20C, so placing the sensor in behind the rad will give a substantial 'improvement ' also.

We like to use ambient air for Intake temp and 0 enertia. When done in this manner, the cars perform as per the hp calculators. When using shoot numbers, the cars underperform........

That's the answer I was looking for!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hence some dyno figures getting around which are truly over the norm....

The difference explained to me by a DD rep quite a while ago:

Inlet Temp - Ambient Temp / 5 = x% difference.

Ex : It's a 25 degree day and the probe is placed in the engine bay and reading 55 degrees.

55-25/5 = 6% will be added to the measured power in shootout mode.

The difference explained to me by a DD rep quite a while ago:

Inlet Temp - Ambient Temp / 5 = x% difference.

Ex : It's a 25 degree day and the probe is placed in the engine bay and reading 55 degrees.

55-25/5 = 6% will be added to the measured power in shootout mode.

Isn't that only half the story? That's the correction for Inlet Temp being above Ambient Temp, but what about Ambient Temp being above DD's reference temp? Based on RPMGTR's post wouldn't it apply additional correction for the Ambient Temp being 25 degrees compared to DD's reference temp of 20 degrees?

Keep in mind Shoot Out Mode doesn't always ADD to the power readings. If the Ambient and Inlet Temps are less than DD's reference temp then it will show LESS power.

:P

Agree with you...

The point i was making, is the discrepancy on where the temp probe is placed and the effect it has on the readings.

There was a dyno sheet where the IT was 82 degrees, a while back.

true...

i remember seeing a thread comparing optimx to bp ultimate

ultimte made about 10 more rwkw, but also had an IT 10-15deg higher than the optimax reading...

hmmmmmm... bit sus to me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...