Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, not really into the 10 sec bracket, but solidly into the 10L/100 km zone, a worthy goal for all stagea owners.

Here's the data from my trip to willowbank a couple of weeks ago. Fill up with 98 octane then drive to track, do 4 passes for best of 15.19 at 91.1 mph, then drive home again (sunshine coast), a few days tootling around town then down to Brisbane again, fill up with 57 litres, travelled 533 km. Thats 10.69 L/100 km. The car shows around 175 awkw on the 91.1 mph pass, given it weighs 1800 kg with me and the tow bar. 60fts piss poor 2.3 sec due to auto, the thing would run 14's if it were manual. Couldnt stall it up any more as it would drag you through the lights.

Mods, jaycar digital fuel adjuster, K&N panel filter in stock airbox, aquarium bleed valve and 8 psi boost (spikes to 10 psi on gear changes), split dump, high flow cat and 3 inch mild steel exhaust. Tuned A/F ratios on the road using a wide band. It cruises happily at 15.5:1 AF ratio and I have 12.5: 1 on boost until around 5800 rpm, after which it richens up into the 11.5:1 area. Total cost of mods approx $700 (got the 3" cat back exhaust cheap off Lone).

I rigged up the digital fuel adjuster so I can turn it on and off while driving , which requires inserting a diode into the output signal line to stop the ECU getting feedback when the DFA is turned off. Did one run with the DFA turned off at the drags for a 15.8 at 88 mph. My calcs suggest the Jaycar unit improves fuel economy around 12% and gives 20 hp (approx + 9% ) at the wheels. Neat stuff

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/
Share on other sites

Ok, not really into the 10 sec bracket, but solidly into the 10L/100 km zone, a worthy goal for all stagea owners.

Here's the data from my trip to willowbank a couple of weeks ago.  Fill up with 98 octane then drive to track, do 4 passes for best of 15.19 at 91.1 mph, then drive home again (sunshine coast), a few days tootling around town then down to Brisbane again, fill up with 57 litres, travelled 533 km.  Thats 10.69 L/100 km.  The car shows around 175 awkw on the 91.1 mph pass, given it weighs 1800 kg with me and the tow bar. 60fts piss poor 2.3 sec due to auto, the thing would run 14's if it were manual.  Couldnt stall it up any more as it would drag you through the lights.

Mods,  jaycar digital fuel adjuster, K&N panel filter in stock airbox, aquarium bleed valve and 8 psi boost (spikes to 10 psi on gear changes), split dump, high flow cat and 3 inch mild steel exhaust.  Tuned A/F ratios on the road using a wide band.  It cruises happily at 15.5:1 AF ratio and I have 12.5: 1 on boost until around 5800 rpm, after which it richens up into the 11.5:1 area.  Total cost of mods approx $700 (got the 3" cat back exhaust cheap off Lone).

 

I rigged up the digital fuel adjuster so I can turn it on and off while driving , which requires inserting a diode into the output signal line to stop the ECU getting feedback when the DFA is turned off.  Did one run with the DFA turned off at the drags for a 15.8 at 88 mph.  My calcs suggest the Jaycar unit improves fuel economy around 12% and gives 20 hp (approx + 9% ) at the wheels. Neat stuff

The more I read about that jaycar unit, the more it looks like a good idea...

2 questions - what stagea do you have (year, type) ? And would you like to post EXACTLY what you did with the diode, as that would help none 'electronic type' car owners do the same?

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1382283
Share on other sites

Ok, not really into the 10 sec bracket, but solidly into the 10L/100 km zone, a worthy goal for all stagea owners.

Here's the data from my trip to willowbank a couple of weeks ago.  Fill up with 98 octane then drive to track, do 4 passes for best of 15.19 at 91.1 mph, then drive home again (sunshine coast), a few days tootling around town then down to Brisbane again, fill up with 57 litres, travelled 533 km.  Thats 10.69 L/100 km.  The car shows around 175 awkw on the 91.1 mph pass, given it weighs 1800 kg with me and the tow bar. 60fts piss poor 2.3 sec due to auto, the thing would run 14's if it were manual.  Couldnt stall it up any more as it would drag you through the lights.

Mods,  jaycar digital fuel adjuster, K&N panel filter in stock airbox, aquarium bleed valve and 8 psi boost (spikes to 10 psi on gear changes), split dump, high flow cat and 3 inch mild steel exhaust.  Tuned A/F ratios on the road using a wide band.  It cruises happily at 15.5:1 AF ratio and I have 12.5: 1 on boost until around 5800 rpm, after which it richens up into the 11.5:1 area.  Total cost of mods approx $700 (got the 3" cat back exhaust cheap off Lone).

 

I rigged up the digital fuel adjuster so I can turn it on and off while driving , which requires inserting a diode into the output signal line to stop the ECU getting feedback when the DFA is turned off.  Did one run with the DFA turned off at the drags for a 15.8 at 88 mph.  My calcs suggest the Jaycar unit improves fuel economy around 12% and gives 20 hp (approx + 9% ) at the wheels. Neat stuff

Well done Ben, 10's is damn impressive. Gotta get the exhaust on mine, work keeps getting in the way. And I have the adj exhaust camshaft pulley and new cambelt to go on as well. BTW, what fuel was it?

Launch technique, I used to be able to just use the left foot braking while the right foot was planted on the accelerator. But with the extra power from the intercooler it drives though the brakes, and wheelies up the rears like a line locker first. I found by adding the handbrake it stops the rear wheelspin and I can hold about 0.5 bar at launch. Flick the handbrake off with the left hand while sliding the left foot off the brake. As soon as I plant the right foot it jumps to 0.7 bar.

It feels to be around 140 to 145 4wkw now, so maybe the extra ~30 4wkw (from the exhaust and the pulley) will mean a change in the launch technique.;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1383048
Share on other sites

10's is incredible, hope mine runs at that. Congrats!

Sorry for the delay in replying - for some reason I forgot to hit the notify of reply button.

If you have the jaycar unit switched so you can turn it on and off, you can run leaner at idle and cruise because it needs less fuel when it is warm. I run the normal ECU programme when it is a cold or hot start, then switch over to the jaycar unit after a minute or so on a hot start, or after the temp gauge reads 1/4 of operating temperature for a hot start. Essentially, I use the stock ECU now only as a choke (they do tend to run like they have the choke on, don't they...) Chances are my fuel settings once the car is warmed up are leaner than, say, Sydneykid is using at idle and cruise, thus the additional fuel savings, though it seemed to like the exhaust too ...

You get a 3 way on/off toggle switch and run the signal wire which comes from the airflow meter to the middle pole of the switch. On one side of the switch run the wire to the Jaycar unit (for this example, a blue coloured wire). On the remaining side of the switch run the wire back to the ECU input (for this example, a green coloured wire). This gives you the ability to bypass the jaycar unit when you want (ie. on a cold or hot start)... However of course the output from the jaycar unit (lets say this wire is red) also has to connect to the ECU input. The jaycar output must splice into the green coloured wire and thats where you get your backfeed and that is why you need a diode in the red wire (signal output from the jaycar unit) before it gets spliced back into the green wire (ECU input). There is around 0.5 V drop through a diode, so if you've already leaned it out using the jaycar unit, you'll have to put some fuel back in to compensate for the diode. Its worth the effort though with the extra fuel saving at idle and cruise, where you can go leaner than 14.7:1 A/F ratio without hurting the motor.

With more stop start around town driving on the next tank, we got "only" 520 km out of 57 L, still 10.9L/100 km. The main problem no matter what we do is these things weigh a tonne and accelerating that mass uses fuel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1394186
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay in replying - for some reason I forgot to hit the notify of reply button.

If you have the jaycar unit switched so you can turn it on and off, you can run leaner at idle and cruise because it needs less fuel when it is warm.  I run the normal ECU programme when it is a cold or hot start, then switch over to the jaycar unit after a minute or so on a hot start, or after the temp gauge reads 1/4 of operating temperature for a hot start.  Essentially, I use the stock ECU now only as a choke (they do tend to run like they have the choke on, don't they...)  Chances are my fuel settings once the car is warmed up are leaner than, say, Sydneykid is using at idle and cruise, thus the additional fuel savings, though it seemed to like the exhaust too ...

You get a 3 way on/off toggle switch and run the signal wire which comes from the airflow meter to the middle pole of the switch.  On one side of the switch run the wire to the Jaycar unit (for this example, a blue coloured wire).  On the remaining side of the switch run the wire back to the ECU input (for this example, a green coloured wire).  This gives you the ability to bypass the jaycar unit when you want (ie. on a cold or hot start)...  However of course the output from the jaycar unit (lets say this wire is red) also has to connect to the ECU input.  The jaycar output must splice into the green coloured wire and thats where you get your backfeed  and that is why you need a diode in the red wire (signal output from the jaycar unit) before it gets spliced back into the green wire (ECU input).  There is around 0.5 V drop through a diode, so if you've already leaned it out using the jaycar unit, you'll have to put some fuel back in to compensate for the diode.  Its worth the effort though with the extra fuel saving at idle and cruise, where you can go leaner than 14.7:1 A/F ratio without hurting the motor.

With more stop start around town driving on the next tank, we got "only" 520 km out of 57 L, still 10.9L/100 km.  The main problem no matter what we do is these things weigh a tonne and accelerating that mass uses fuel.

OK I'm confused, at idle and crusie mine runs closed loop, so it doesn't matter what the DFA is set to. The ECU will always aim for its target A/F ratio (ie; lambda voltage), changing the AFM voltage has no effect of the closed loop aim table. The standard ECU has water temp compensation (ie; when cold go richer X%) and it doesn't run closed loop until the engine gets up to normal operating temperature.

So if I lean it off at light throttle (open loop) then it will lean it out a bit at cold run, but I doubt that would be enough to cause it to run rough. It certainly wouldn't cause any damage as it is still in a rich running state. If I am merely compensatiing for increased efficiency (eg; exhaust) then it won't, in fact, be any leaner at cold run than it was standard.

So remain confused :confused:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1395486
Share on other sites

OK I'm confused, at idle and crusie mine runs closed loop, so it doesn't matter what the DFA is set to.  The ECU will always aim for its target A/F ratio (ie; lambda voltage), changing the AFM voltage has no effect of the closed loop aim table.  The standard ECU has water temp compensation (ie; when cold go richer X%) and it doesn't run closed loop until the engine gets up to normal operating temperature.

So if I lean it off at light throttle (open loop) then it will lean it out a bit at cold run, but I doubt that would be enough to cause it to run rough.  It certainly wouldn't cause any damage as it is still in a rich running state.  If I am merely compensatiing for increased efficiency (eg; exhaust) then it won't, in fact, be any leaner at cold run than it was standard.

So remain confused  :confused:

Yes, I ran around for a few days with the wideband on (I had another O2 sensor boss welded onto the split dump so I could run the stock O2 sensor as well as the wide band). With the DFA switched off it indeed runs at closed loop at cruise and idle, but runs rich on boost (as rich as 10.5:1) and also during throttle transients. With the DFA switched on (with its output running through the diode, remember, before it enters the ECU) it leans it off at cruise and idle, right through the rev range in fact. I can get a stable cruise at 16:1 and , would you believe, a stable idle too at that A/F ratio (once the stepper motor catches up), it begins to run rough at idle around 17: 1. A testimony to the combustion chamber design I think. Set up like this, you need to switch off the DFA for cold starts (and briefly for hot starts too). I placed the switch on one of those blank inserts on the dash to the right of the steering wheel, so its near the keys and hence easy to switch on and off as required during cold or hot starts. My guess is that the ECU can only trim so much fuel in or out to achieve stochiometric at closed loop.

I'm not making any of this up, I simply tuned as I always do, determined a baseline, gathered appropriate data using a reliable tool (a calibrated wide band O2) , then modified A/F ratios to suit the tuning aim at hand using the DFA. I was pleasantly surprised to see how much control the DFA gave me over fuelling set up as I have it. If you have access to a wide band and put an extra O2 boss in your dump pipe it might be worth checking what you car is doing on the road with the DFA - you might be surprised as if you got near 500 km out of a tank, you might be leaner than 14.7:1 at cruise too. If we can replicate this on another car, it may well be information worth having, though I'm sure some people won't want to revert to a manual "choke" switch on their stagea, even if turning the choke off gives them 20 hp.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1395592
Share on other sites

OK, I am still confused.....more help required........

With the DFA switched on (with its output running through the diode, remember, before it enters the ECU) it leans it off at cruise and idle, right through the rev range in fact.  I can get a stable cruise at 16:1 and , would you believe, a stable idle too at that A/F ratio (once the stepper motor catches up), it begins to run rough at idle around 17: 1.

I can lean mine off as much as I like with the DFA, as soon as it goes closed loop (idle and cruise) it goes to 14.7. My understanding is that is the target in the aim table in the standard ECU.

My guess is that the ECU can only trim so much fuel in or out to achieve stochiometric at closed loop.

I haven't seen the Stagea closed loop aim table, but the R32 and R33's have no limit. The ECU can turn the injectors right off if necessary in an attempt to reach the target. I don't think that matters anyway, if the target is 14.7 it will richen it up (also unlimited) if necessary to reach that target.

As for idle, I unplug the AFM (zero voltage) and mine will still idle and start fine, hot or cold. I don't believe the ECU uses AFM signals at idle at all, it use engine rpm, water temp, throttle position, road speed and lambda when in closed loop. It is only when I attempt to get off idle that there is an issue, basically it stalls when I apply load. Since you have had some success, I must test lowering the voltage with the DFA to see whether that makes any difference on mine.

Over 15.5 there is a general warning about its effect on exhaust valve seats. Plus there is an argument that says you need more throttle opening to hold the cruise speed, so there may not in fact be any benefit. The test is injector duration (which can be read off the IEBC input), if the injector duration is longer (regardless of the lambda) then it is using more fuel.

Verrrrry interesting, sparked my interest to do some more fiddling, as if I don't already have enough to do.

:P

Ps, even with a power FC and Datalogit software on the R32's and R33's, I can't change the closed loop aim table.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1396975
Share on other sites

Interesting you mention the closed-loop use at idle. That gives my faulty O2 sensor theory more weight, as the idle on my car would hunt (indicating non-optimal mixtures) and there was occassionally a drop in idle speed to around 500rpm & a resulting flat-spot on take-off.

Now the O2 sensor has been replaced, all is VERY well in regards to the idle. It's smooth, consistent & the initial throttle response is excellent.

Oh, I've bought a DFA & controller too - and grabbed myself a handheld single channel CRO. Been meaning to get one for years....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1398958
Share on other sites

I have not yet done a long distance using a whole tank. I did a trip a while ago, used 1/2 a tank on the open road, the other 1/2 round town, and got 11.5 l/100km. Around town it's about 14-15 l/100km. I figure that a whole tank open road trip would be in the 10's. The car is standard everything, cruised at around 110 for the open road. It is colder here in NZ, lately driving to work in the mornings it's about 5degC, the Stagea loves the cold air.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1402504
Share on other sites

The Velleman unit from Jaycar (plus soft case.). I've used one of these at work, and it's more than adequate for 'hobby 'use:

 http://www1.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=QC1916

Looks good..

If anyone wants to see the full tech, it is at http://www.velleman.be/common/product.Aspx...lan=1&id=348271

Ian

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75288-into-the-10s/#findComment-1416393
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • well mate, while I hear your pain, turns out I don't feel it this time! Must have been a bastard of a job crammed into the boot The tank was very empty (probably pumped out, not dropped and drained because there were some fumes still) and in very good condition internally. I'm sure he never ran e85 in it I don't know what the hell Nissan's fuel tank engineers were thinking about their clipping system, this hanger was really hard to get moving but came out in the end All looks very good (as I'm starting to hopefully expect) and Matty was right it is an 023 (044) bosch which should be plenty for the injectors and turbo
    • Saturday 8th February 2025 8:30am Capped 26 entries Standard Entry Fee: $89 Members Entry Fee: $55 (SAU Victoria Only) Entries Close: Thursday 6th February 8pm. Supp Regs: TBC Disclaimer: Download  Please electronically sign and email to [email protected] or print and hand in and Driver Sign In. email [email protected] To compete in this event you will require A valid AASA General speed licence Or (Day license is $35.00 via the AASA Website) MA licenses no longer accepted A helmet, long sleeve clothing and it is reccomended a 1KG mounted fire extinguisher (But not Mandatory). Further details within Supp Regs Above. You can bring and have a passenger in the car but they need to comply to the same safety and clothing as driver. Entry Link >> https://www.sauvic.com.au/entry/deca/20250208 Entry List: 1. Martin Sullivan 2.  3.  4.  5.  6.  7.  8.  9. 10.  11. 12.   13. 14 15.  16.  17.  18.  19. 20.  21.  22.  23.  24.  25. 26.    Reserve list 1.  2.
    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
×
×
  • Create New...