Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

Rebuilt turbo on second dyno run much better though the tuner is still not happy with it says exhaust to quite to restrictive (but it nice and quite) beleives injectors are the wrong type (hi flow rotary idle problems) and to small and running to hot so tuning was stopped till problems rectified but still pretty good result will post dybo graphs of low and high boost for opions

thanks Peter

Hi Guys

Been rebuilding my car from the ground up for the last 18 months finally got to the stage of dyno tuning today with dissappointing results I like some oppionions from people with a bit more experence than Ive got on these matters

as to why you think its not making much power at the moment the tuners have given mr there ideas but would like some more ,I'll list the mods and the graph and like to hear all idea's

1. 600x300x76 fmic

2.Hks cast exhaust manifold

3.Hks 35mm external waste gate

4.Hks t04 with .4 exhaust housing

5.Hks adjustable cam gears set a standard for now

6.Hks 264 inlet and exhaust cams 9mm lift

7.Hks air filter in standard air box with cold air induction

8.Head ported and polished

9. inlet plenum runners honed smooth

10.460 high flowed injectors

11.Gfb stealth fx plumbed back into inlet system

12. Malpassi rising rate fuel pressure regulator

13 gtr fuel pump

14.full 3" exhaust system from turbo back waste gate plumbed back into exhaust just b4 high flow cat

15. Wolf 3d ver 4 plug in with boost control and thurmo fan control

Thats all i can think of off the top of my head that has to do with engine mods bottom end standard but has only 60400klm's on it still hone marks in the bore

just like to hear from you guys now on your verdicts on the problem just gotta try and post the dyno graph now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/76432-rb20det-dissappointing-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Hi Guys        Been rebuilding my car from the ground up for the last 18 months finally got to the stage of dyno tuning today with dissappointing results I like some oppionions from people with a bit more experence than Ive got on these matters  

as to why you think its not making much power at the moment the tuners have given mr there ideas but would like some more ,I'll list the mods and the graph and like to hear all idea's  

1. 600x300x76 fmic

2.Hks cast exhaust manifold

3.Hks 35mm external waste gate

4.Hks t04 with .4 exhaust housing

5.Hks  adjustable cam gears set a standard for now

6.Hks 264 inlet and exhaust cams 9mm lift

7.Hks air filter in standard air box with cold air induction

8.Head ported and polished

9. inlet plenum runners honed smooth

10.460 high flowed injectors

11.Gfb stealth fx plumbed back into inlet system

12. Malpassi rising rate fuel pressure regulator

13 gtr fuel pump

14.full 3" exhaust system from turbo back waste gate plumbed back into exhaust just b4 high flow cat

15. Wolf 3d ver 4 plug in with boost control and thurmo fan control

Thats all i can think of off the top of my head that has to do with engine mods bottom end standard but has only 60400klm's on it still hone marks in the bore

just like to hear from you guys now on your verdicts on the problem just gotta try and post the dyno graph now.

Hi, Legend01, 160 rwkw is a bit low for the mods, depends on the boost of course, I would be looking for 220+ rwkw so there is a fair bit to go. Do you have the graphs of the boost curve and the A/F ratios?

There are couple of simple things I do when I get a lower than expected result on the dyno. First I remove the airfilter, just run the AFM open and see what difference that makes. Then I drop the exhaust, from just in front of the cat, that will tell you if you have a problem there. These are both done on the dyno as they only take a few minutes to test.

If they both show nothing drastic, then I like to know what sort of restriction the intercooler has. So I compare it, out of the turbo and at the plenum, obviously i don't have to do that on the dyno. If it shows no real restriction then everything else is down to tuning, A/F ratios, boost, ignition timing and cam timing.

Hope that helps:cheers:

Sorry i dont have those graphs but that was running 18psi there but from 12 to 18 boost kept droping of around the same -place and going back down to 8psi within 500-rpm depending on what boost we were puting into it

Thanks Peter

Hi guys

SXC180 it is a .48 when the turbo was rebuilt at Dyna torque paul there said he had never seen one that small but with as large an impeller blade

Turbine

It was an auto it now has an exceedy 450 hp clutch in it and an R33 gearbox

Cheers Peter

Ive had this problem with my old rb20 when i put a fresh motor in it. Set the base timing up to 15degrees and it made about 150rwhp. Very weak. I then moved the crank angle sensor to where it used to sit just passed the half way mark between the top right 10mm bolt and it made 220rwhp .

Hybrid 600x300x76 we tested that was flowing free

                                                                                  Peter

hmm, is it one of the hybrid copies floating around?

they tend to be very free flowing yes, but they don't actually cool well.

maybe have a look at intake temps

I had a similar problem after my PFC/injectors went in, didn't matter what boost, it made 160rwkw

Turned out to be a leaking intercooler hose, tightened it up, made another 40rwkw

Check them all, as well as idle vacuum

Chris

RB20DET...that's your problem :cheers:

no but seriously, what AFR is it running? Could be that. My feeling is that the cam timing or the tuning is off. Just for reference I currently make 150rwkw with:

Blitz LM FMIC

3" turbo back w/ high flow cat

stock air box

stock turbo (12psi)

stock internals

A'PEXi S-AFC2

Doesn't a stock R33 turbo have a 0.43 rear?

That turbo you have don't sound right at all.

and you said it gets to 18 psi then drops back to 9..

isn't that what happens when the revs catch up with the psi on a restrictive turbo?

reminds me of my MX6 I used to have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 馃槑 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 馃槈
  • Create New...