Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK OK - at the risk of being flamed for not using the search function, I'm going to ask how much boost

1: can I run with R34 N1 turbos (Series 1 - with the .42 comp housing)

2: should I run with R34 N1 trubos

Two VERY different questions - yes

I've just had my engine rebuild completed and run it (hurray!!). I've installed a PFC and EBC with Adj cam gears (blah blah blah – it's all just an expensive blur of spending now). Max boost is currently set to 18psi - and I'm getting ~300awkw. All in all, a good result I think.

Last time I posted this question (before I started the rebuild) - I think the consensus was that 18psi was about the peak efficiency rating for these turbos. They ?could? push more - but at my own risk.

My question is - if my next upgrade was to be ...

Bigger injectors - probably 550cc

RB25 AFMs with suction kit

Possibly a BIGGER FMIC and hard pipe kit ???

1: would that make any difference to performance @ 18psi

2: could I run higher boost - more safely and why ?

3: would cams be a better upgrade

Talk to me guys – if you have these turbos – what boost do you run and for how long have you been running it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77309-r34-n1-trubos-how-much-boost/
Share on other sites

1.dont bother with 550cc if your going to upgrade go 700cc (trust me on this one) the pfc run them like a breeze.

2.cams are a good investment when bought with adjustable wheels and the timing tuned on a dyno.(i was lucky and got over a 100rwhp increase not everyone may great such large returns, as every motors different)(have seen 30rwhp increase in just tuning std cams)

3.you will need to upgrade afms if you want to make much more power as you would be close to maxing out the std and the rb20/25 are a great choice.

as for the r34n1 turbos with .42 compressors i have yet to see a office document showing any other than .60 housing for the r34n1(gt2560r) turbos? I will try and find the threads i have seen on here with the data sheets and link to this thread.

1.dont bother with 550cc if your going to upgrade go 700cc (trust me on this one) the pfc run them like a breeze.

2.cams are a good investment when bought with adjustable wheels and the timing tuned on a dyno.(i was lucky and got over a 100rwhp increase not everyone may great such large returns, as every motors different)(have seen 30rwhp increase in just tuning std cams)

3.you will need to upgrade afms if you want to make much more power as you would be close to maxing out the std and the rb20/25 are a great choice.

as for the r34n1 turbos with .42 compressors i have yet to see a office document showing any other than .60 housing for the r34n1(gt2560r) turbos? I will try and find the threads i have seen on here with the data sheets and link to this thread.

i CAN give you part numbers if that will help :D

Talk to me guys – if you have these turbos – what boost do you run and for how long have you been running it

Boost is irrelevant, it is simply a measure of resistance to flow. As you remove the restrictions, the boost goes down. Airflow makes horsepower not boost, so the aim is to have the highest airflow at the lowest boost.

I have seen them make ~300 rwkw at ~2 bar, and I have seen them make ~350 rwkw at ~1.5 bar. It all depends on how many restrictions you have removed. So forget the boost gauge and look at the inlet air temps, that will tell you when you have reached the efficiency limit of the turbos.

;)

Boost is irrelevant, it is simply a measure of resistance to flow.  As you remove the restrictions, the boost goes down.  Airflow makes horsepower not boost, so the aim is to have the highest airflow at the lowest boost.

I have seen them make ~300 rwkw at ~2 bar, and I have seen them make ~350 rwkw at ~1.5 bar.  It all depends on how many restrictions you have removed.  So forget the boost gauge and look at the inlet air temps, that will tell you when you have reached the efficiency limit of the turbos.

;)

so what should this temp be ?

OK

so based on the above VALUABLE input from SK - I assume if I upgrade AFMs and injectors and re-tune,

I should see the same power at lower boost

and/or

I will probably see more power @ 18psi

this assumes nothing else leaps in the way - and becomes rate determining in terms of air flow like my FMIC for example

SK is talking about getting the air pass the heads in to the pots easier.

Stick bigger cams in there and you reduce the restriction, allowing greater airflow with less boost.

Upgrading AFM's to larger items will increase the turbo's efficiency. If with the N1's it makes a definite difference I'm not sure. :(

i'm surprise you can make 300 all wheel killowats with standard injectors. With 253 REAR wheel killowats my standard injectors where near maxed out (granted the tune is quite rich) but still I would guess 300 all wheel killowats is around 330-350 rear wheel kws. that's quite a lot, especially with standard afms too. What is the peak voltage? and peak duty cycle??

so what should this temp be ?

There is no absolute value, what I do is monitor the compressor outlet air temps as I increase the boost. When you go past the turbos efficiency to produce airflow you wil see a jump in the air temps, for example;

1 bar = 50 degrees

1.1 bar = 52 degrees

1.2 bar = 55 degrees

1.3 bar = 60 degrees

1.4 bar = 75 degrees

I would go back to 1.3 bar as the extra 15 degrees is going to negate any advantage power increase from the extra 0.1 bar of boost.

SK is talking about getting the air pass the heads in to the pots easier
Spot on, plus getting it out (exhaust) as well.

:(

thanks SK – it's always good to understand these things (temps)

OK - lets clear up a few details with this thread

Mazfix only have a 2 wheel dyno - so the graph I have posted is actually rwkw (not awkw) - I think SK indicated that would be more like 280awkw (we will see)

BUT

having driven the car around for a while now – it does not feel like 300kw to me (I'm no expert however)

So ..... my suspicious nature has convinced me to booked my car in for a power run on a four wheel dyno this Monday. It's the same dyno I pulled my 210awkw base line before starting my rebuild. It was a while ago – but I hope to be able to compare the tractive effort figures before and after to get a REAL comparison of how I'm looking now (weather and other conditions aside)

I've also been monitoring some of the data coming out of the PFC (as suggested) – so far I have see a peak knock of 47 (engine light came on at the top of third gear – but I did not check the injectors – sorry). How BAD is that ? (no knock is good knock - yes ?)

From what I've read on other threads – 280awkw is the peak reading I should get with the std injectors – so I doubt I'm getting that yet. Based on the seat of the pants feel (using the 210awkw as a base) I'd say I'm more in the 250-260awkw range, so I may still have some work to do. (cams you say - hmmmm)

I'll post the results of the power run tomorrow

OK

had the 4 wheel power run done this morning (cold and wet here is Brisbane today) and still managed to get 291.7akwk. This is down from 304rwkw on the Maxfix 2 wheel dyno (so not that much in it really).

BUT

The guys from C&J aborted the run on the 2nd attempt due to knocking and the fact that my mixtures where leaning out (heading towards 13:1 when they stopped the run). Have a look at the attached graph of the run – and let me know if this looks like a big problem.

pass12917awkw8xn.jpg

The first thing I notice (after the OUTSTANDING result) is the mixtures are only 12.5:1 – but climbing

The second interesting thing is that the boost level is not exactly flat, it seems to waver up and down once max boost is reached (sorry boost is not on this graph). I've just installed a PFC with the Apexi EBC and had hoped it would do a batter job than that !!!

Bigger injectors and RB25 AFMs will address this right (that's what the man said)– but what should I do in the mean time. Maxfix have offered to have another look (take out some timing I think they said). They also suggested octane booster would help (Nulon ProStrength ???)

1/can i see a chart with the awkw on it?

2/afm and injectors should help BUT there maybe a problem with fuel delivery (ie pump and filter etc)

3/ are your injectors and afms maxing out on the run it's a very easy thing to see with the pfc hand controller max recall?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...