Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1/can i see a chart with the awkw on it?

Yep !

passcomp2917awkw0lt.jpg

The darker lines are for comparison from a base line run I did with my old turbos and b4 the engine rebuild (about 12 months ago)

2/afm and injectors should help BUT there maybe a problem with fuel delivery (ie pump and filter etc)

new Tomei fuel pump and fuel filter installed last week :(

3/ are your injectors and afms maxing out on the run it's a very easy thing to see with the pfc hand controller max recall?

Agree - but they turned the car off b4 I could check it - that resets the HC - yes

The MAX knock I have seen so far is ~47

The MAX AFM (volts?) reading I have seem so far is ~4.8

The MAx injector duty cycle I have seen so far is in the high 90%

Sorry guys - I still a noobe with the PFC

3/ are your injectors and afms maxing out on the run it's a very easy thing to see with the pfc hand controller max recall?

werd. check this out first before you start chasing your tail. switch to monitoring inj duty and afm voltage, turn on peak hold and give it a run, if you can't do it on the dyno, do it on the highway, start at the on ramp and rev it right through first and right through second and unfortunately that is all you can legally do. the read the peak values. if you inj duty is at 100% and afm voltage at 5.1 then yes an injector upgrade and afm upgrade would be wise. if not you either have fuel delivery to the rail problem (pump, reg, lines, filter etc) or a tuning problem (poor tune). knock of 47 is too high too imo. I drive the nuts off my car when I'm at the track and it sees a few 6000rpm dumps and a few 7000rpm shifts and the knock is never above 15 since I had the cam gears adjusted (even before that was never over 25).

ok well take it for a run down the road and just keep an eye on the engine warning light. It should be able to give you a good indication where your at , but do make sure your got all your warning enabled in the pfc. I find the best way is in the monitoring mode with 8 display mode (pick the most suitable 8 inputs and enable peak hold)then just check after each run and reset before the next.

pete

werd. check this out first before you start chasing your tail. switch to monitoring inj duty and afm voltage, turn on peak hold and give it a run, if you can't do it on the dyno, do it on the highway, start at the on ramp and rev it right through first and right through second and unfortunately that is all you can legally do. the read the peak values. if you inj duty is at 100% and afm voltage at 5.1 then yes an injector upgrade and afm upgrade would be wise. if not you either have fuel delivery to the rail problem (pump, reg, lines, filter etc) or a tuning problem (poor tune). knock of 47 is too high too imo. I drive the nuts off my car when I'm at the track and it sees a few 6000rpm dumps and a few 7000rpm shifts and the knock is never above 15 since I had the cam gears adjusted (even before that was never over 25).

Ok - will do - will need to wait for the rain to stop tho !!!

BTW - I already have Tomei adj cam gears installed (IN and EX) - does that make these readings worse ?

Ok - will do - will need to wait for the rain to stop tho !!!

BTW - I already have Tomei adj cam gears installed (IN and EX) - does that make these readings  worse ?

cam gears are not your problem here and would really not impact result they are just a tuning tool for setting the cam to crank timing. Your problem is fuel and a/f ratio.

But on another note sense you have cam gears its well worth it when you have sorted out your fuel problem, it well worth spending some time to tune the cams as i have seen 30rwhp and 300nm of tractable effect increases on std cams and my went 100rwhp on stage to poncams. Just some food for thought.

pete

I just had mine tuned today.

A nice conservative de-tune to look after the 240,000kms+ motor. Even at the 13.8psi of boost it could quite easily have the fuel and ignition cranked to get 400rwhp (at one stage it was heading that way so we put a stop to that). A purfect little bit of extra power for the daily work vehicle. :(

Ok - will do - will need to wait for the rain to stop tho !!!

BTW - I already have Tomei adj cam gears installed (IN and EX) - does that make these readings  worse ?

no it doesn't really make them worse. I was more just saying that you should be able to achieve a knock of well under 30 with some tuning work. ignition timing is very crucial when it comes to engine knock, not just the AFR. i was quite surprised that tuning the cam gears affected my knock readings but it did. without touching the PFC, just by changing the cam gear settings the boost rose by 2psi, the AFR leaned out slightly and the knock level is now lower. oh, and the car made 30kw more atw. :(

Cubes - to be honest I don't know how the cam gears are currently set - tho I will ask and let you know

Also - I've just filled up with 98 ron fuel (I always use PULP) and added a bottle of Octane Boost (Wyns) - and now my knock level peaks at 40 – even at full noise, and only at 7500rpm and above.

The other thing I noted was that my knock level hits 30 – even when not driving hard. I've herd that forged pistons (I have Wysco BTW) can make the engine noisy (especially when cold). Is this true – and does anyone know if Wysco are a particularly noisy piston. Could this make my knock readings look higher than they are – and if so how else do I check for pinging ?

NB - I am NOT pushing hard when the engine is cold, and I did re-set the peak holds after the engine had warmed up. (I understand that forged pistons rattle less once warm - yes?)

I run wiseco's with the largest recommended bore to piston clearance which is apparently for 24+psi or track use.

I do get piston slap first thing in the morning, however it doesn't register as knock on the PFC controller. So I doubt piston knock is picked up by the knock sensors, possibly the hz is not correct so it ignores it?

Driving around normally I get a maxiumum knock of 10.

From idle to peak RPM (5000rpm lol) she generally doesn't go over 18.

What I have noticed is that part throttle full boost or coming off half way through the gear peaks knock up around 30 some times 35. Obviously a couple of little places on the map are running slightly more ignition timing than it should.

For what it is worth (Probably not much) I overlayed the dyno charts from PNBlights R33 (with 0.6 A/R comp Garrett GT25-60's plus other goodies), itbmils (with 0.42 A/R R34 N1's) & my R32 running stock turbos & 13lb. Hopefully gives an idea of the gains for the various set ups.

itbmils,

You need to take some timing out. By the sounds of it the tune was aiming at getting you lots of power. The problem is it can leave very little margin for changes in air quality and temperatures resulting in higher than you want knock values.

The normal driving knock under light throttle / cruising might be a buggered O2 sensor. We found mine were stuffed when we were tuning mine in 'closed loop' so for the time being I have it turned off and will suffer the slightly worse fuel ecconomy, for the sake of safety. Mind you the fuel ecconomy was crap as a result anyway, so it might even improve.

there are two of them. one in each dump pipe. you can check by going into the sensor check screen in the PFC HC. look for one having a very different value than the other, or one that doesn't change voltage at all, regardless of condition. personally I can't see them affecting knock at all. they will only affect the tune whilst you are cruising at light load/part throttle. under full throttle the ecu is in 'open loop' (ie. not targetting a specific AFR as shown by the o2 sensors)

Generally for light load tuning you turn off the O2 sensor then tune up to around 30rwkw with a 14.7:1 AFR.

Then turn back on the O2 closed loop mode, the idea is the afr's are nearly spot on so bugger all trim has to occur.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...