Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have had a few quotes:

Young & Cool - Quoted me more over the phone than over the internet :|

NRMA - Don't insure imports :D

Just Car - Waiting for them to get back to me

AAMI - Don't insure skylines :)

Vigil - Don't insure skylines :(

Famous Classic Car - Good price, but still too much :(

Are there any others??

Who are you guys/girls insured with?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/7770-who-will-insure-a-skyline/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by cereal_jacques

You're not gonna get any cheaper than Famous.......

Shouldn't you have investigated this before buying your car?

Yeah I did..... however young & cool have now changed their mind :D and added $1k to the price :):( :(

I can afford them however I want the cheapest

DREMEN: not wanting to state the obvious but you have elected to buy one of the highest risk cars around. Anything $3K and under for insurance is a steal if you can find it.

Most places are now around $5K minimum, it sucks but this is the price we pay.

Thats garbage, care to supply the REST of the information mate, the only way premiums of that price are possible is by having a car insured under a fleet arrangement.

No way that a 21 your old female can insure a skyline under her name entirely for $650.

2 things...

1.) young and cool are homos!!!

2.)

Thats garbage, care to supply the REST of the information mate, the only way premiums of that price are possible is by having a car insured under a fleet arrangement.

maybe his excess is 20k or something :lol:

Originally posted by meggala

the clue could be that car is in qld and might be in the country

and driven by a girl

meggala

well you can rule out the girl idea!!! cos i'm paying around the same as Jay (I'm also with Suncorp).

and given that me and Jay are both in Canberra, which is considered 'reasonably' low risk compared to Sydney or somewhere, I find it hard to believe that country QLD is the reason hers is so low...well not just low...half the damn price!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...