Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In an effort to keep avoide even more hoses running accross my engine bay, I'm thinking about only running one 3/4inch hose from the rocker covers (using the OEM joiner hose) to the catch can.

Will this flow enough? I'm guessing that it will, because from factory, all they have is one 19mm hose and another one going to the PCV valve which is pretty small and wouln't flow much anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77745-oil-catch-can-for-gtr/
Share on other sites

In an effort to keep avoide even more hoses running accross my engine bay, I'm thinking about only running one 3/4inch hose from the rocker covers (using the OEM joiner hose) to the catch can.

Will this flow enough? I'm guessing that it will, because from factory, all they have is one 19mm hose and another one going to the PCV valve which is pretty small and wouln't flow much anyway.

The PCV valve opens under vacuum (ie; when the throttle is closed) so there is PLENTY of sucking making up for small holes.

Back to the question at hand, as long as you run the cam covers linking hose there is no problem with only running one vent hose to the catch can.

;)

so you could have one hose from the cam covers going to the can, and one from the can venting? or returning the vapour to the inlet (pre-turbo, or post turbo - i've seen both)?

If you are venting it to the inlet plumbing, then the can needs to be sealed, otherwise the inlet simply pulls (un-metered) air through the can vent. And you probably want it returning PRE-turbo, otherwise you'll blow all the air back through the can under boost.

yep, that's what I was thinking. non-vented can. run one (bridged) line from the cam covers to the can, run one from the can to the turbo inlet (post AFM, pre-turbo). the ones I've seen post turbo use a one way valve to prevent the boosted air blowing back through the can and pressurising the cam covers. doesn't seem worth the bother though.

This is my catch can set-up....

red arrow = pipe to turbo inlet blocked with bolt

yellow arrow = standard connection

blue arrow = 2 connections as seen one going to yellow arrow, the other to catch can

then there is the 2 pipes bought from pirtek going to catch can with K & N filter on catch can...

catch can is chock-a-block with stocking filled with stainless steel wire/mesh

I think this is right... I am sure SK will be able to advise :P

I had it made.... was a spun up bit of alloy from a guy down at the Gong... and then lesuire coast welders.... they made up the rest... with welded 20mm pipe attachments and filter...

I made up the brackets and the pipes etc....

all up about $180

SK knows the site for the alloy bit ;) I have forgotten it sadly....

so is it hooked up right? I have left the PCV I think, but no nasty fumes going into the intercooler which is what I wanted.....

ok I got my hose from pirtek at about $20 a metre it is generally used for air-compressor line, but seems to fine in this application also (having seen a few race cars running it, and it is hardly stressed with pressure etc etc....)

I'm wondering if someone (SK) can come and explain using my colour coded pic if my setup is correct? I can't see why having the factory pipe (yellow) is bad???

thanks :)

This is my catch can set-up....  

attachment.php?attachmentid=39560

red arrow = pipe to turbo inlet blocked with bolt

yellow arrow = standard connection

blue arrow = 2 connections as seen one going to yellow arrow, the other to catch can

then there is the 2 pipes bought from pirtek going to catch can with K & N filter on catch can...

catch can is chock-a-block with stocking filled with stainless steel wire/mesh

I think this is right... I am sure SK will be able to advise :)

My suggestions;

1. The catch can plumbing is OK.

2. (Red Arrow) Blocking off the breather to the inlet (between the AFM and the turbo) is OK. This stops any oil mist getting into the turbos, pipework and intercooler. This is a good thing as the oil mist condenses and acts as an insulator which stops the heat transfer out of the inlet air in the intercooler.

3. (Yellow Arrow) Keeping the PCV valve (and its plumbing) connected will mean that oil mist gets into the combustion process when the engine is not on boost. The main propblem with oil mist is that it promotes detonation on boost. So continuing to use the PCV valve means any oil mist on overrunn will get burnt as per the standard PCV process.

(A) You could simply block the PCV system off and remove the standard plumbing, that way all oil mist will go into the catch can.

(B) You could replace the filter on the catch can with a hose that connects to the PCV valve. That way any oil mist will get trapped by the stainles steel wool in the catch can and not get into the combustion process, ever. You would need to disconnect and remove the standard plumbing from the RHS cam cover to the PVC valve. This is a totally closed system (not open to ambient air), so it would be fully legal.

That's the 3 ways you can run a catch can, you currently have 50% plumb back, (A) is 100% open to atmosphere, (B) is 100% plumb back.

Hope that makes sense:cheers:

ahhhh guru!

well I don't want any detonation....

ok, so if I keep the pipe to the PCV and block it like I did to the turbo inlet that does pretty much the same thing....(bolt inside with hose clamp)

2moro's job!

yes I know still another week till I actually have to do some real work :rofl:

question if i do it the 50% plumb back way is it legal..

Im not sure and just fitted my catch can.

Dont want to give the police another reason to spank me

and if i dont block off the pvc to the intercooler pipes will the catch can still work.

or is it better.

Catch can has steal wool in it.

question if i do it the 50% plumb back way is it legal..

Im not sure and just fitted my catch can.

Dont want to give the police another reason to spank me

and if i dont block off the pvc to the intercooler pipes will the catch can still work.

or is it better.

Catch can has steal wool in it.

Only 100% plumb back could be considered legal.:rofl:

The PCV valve opens under vacuum (ie; when the throttle is closed) so there is PLENTY of sucking making up for small holes.

Back to the question at hand, as long as you run the cam covers linking hose there is no problem with only running one vent hose to the catch can.

;)

is it a good idea to block off the pcv valve when installing a catch can or jus leave it connected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
×
×
  • Create New...