Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Thanks for the great feedback on my previous thread about clutches.

Just got one last thing on my mind right now.

What is the differences between the different amount of pucks on the single plates ? Ok I know the physical differences as Ive seen them for myself....just wanna know the theoretical applications.

Say theoretically, with all things equal. The following clutches were installed on the same car with same driver and same power at all times.

Single plate 9 puck

single plate 3 puck

Twin plate

Which one would last the longest ?

Heard some say twinplates dont last that long compared to singles then the other night a mate swears that his friend wore out a 3 puck single plate in 6 months !!!!! which has got me a little concerned as I have already ordered the 3 puck single ceramic for my car :)

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/78391-clutch-questionagain/
Share on other sites

The more pucks the better!

The more surface area you are covering, the less over all wear.

There is alot more strain and wear on 3 pucks then on 9 pucks of equal size, thickness and compond.

The same goes for twin plates, as this states, there are 2 plates of pucks then just the one.

Hope this helps

ok so would a 9 puck hold just as much power as a 3 puck ??

or would the 3 puck hold more ?

If the 3 puck does hold more wouldnt it balance out in the end ?

ie 9 puck wont be able to hold the power and hence wear out at a faster or equal rate to the 3 puck.

If we are talking about the same clutch and the difference is 3 or 9 puck, well the 9 puck will hold more as long as it is the same size, width & compond as the 3 puck.

When you have more of it to grip with, it will hold more power. Because you have more surface area eg. more pucks - there is more compond to grip the flywheel and pressure plates

Ok.

Please dont take this the wrong way cause im not doubting your knowledge.  

But if we go by your theory shouldnt a full face clutch be better than any "puck" clutch ??

I mean what are the advantages of having the pucks then ?

Yeah you have a point there, When I was replacing the clutch the guys that make them here in Adelaide told me that a clutch with pucks will do better than a full face (performance wise), the full face will be more friendly for day to day driving.

So interested to see who is right here, cause I got a 5 puck one.

If the full face clutch was made with the same compond material as the puck type cluches well it would be better. Most of the time it comes down to manufactering costs. There is no point in placing more pucks or clutch compond if increases the price and does not suit the market intended for.

If you look at a Nismo twin plate clutch, they have almost a full face clutch with the puck style compond which is made up of ceramic compond. The reason for the gaps is heat and the ability for some flex. because these use a large ceramic pad (puck) they are more expensive.

I rang Adelaide Clutches (Xtreme) as they can replace the ceramic pads on them. I almost fell over when then gave me the price, think it was like $1200.00

Reason - it was almost a full face with just some slits in them.

If the clutch was manufactured to hold say 300 HP and it does this with 3 pucks of ceramic pad then way had more? If you added more the clutch price would increase and so would the rated HP.

Another thing you could do is increase the puck's surface area by adding more and decreasing the pressure plate force. You get a softer clutch with the same HP rating but this would cost more as manufacturing costs have also increased.

If you think about it, a twin plate works by have more pads on more metal, silimar to say like having 2 fly wheels and 2 clutch plates. The pressure plate does not have to be very high as there is already alot of compond in contact with metal. Not saying the pressure plates in twin plates are always soft but in the case of the Nismo twin plate, they get a high HP rating cause they use a full face clutch with a medium pressure plate. These are some of the reasons why it holds good power and is light on the foot and behaves like a stock clutch.

Yeah you have a point there,     When I was replacing the clutch the guys that make them here in Adelaide told me that a clutch with pucks will do better than a full face (performance wise), the full face will be more friendly for day to day driving.

So interested to see who is right here, cause I got a 5 puck one.

I think the terms full face might be misunderstood here.

Is the full face made of the same compond as the 5 puck one?

Usually the full face they speak about is made up of similar compond used in stock clutches but the puck version is made up of ceramic compond. In this case the 5 puck one will do a better jop performance wise.

I think the terms full face might be misunderstood here.

Is the full face made of the same compond as the 5 puck one?

Usually the full face they speak about is made up of similar compond used in stock clutches but the puck version is made up of ceramic compond. In this case the 5 puck one will do a better jop performance wise.

So if you put a full face and a 5 puck made out of the same material, whatever this may be, the full face one is gonna do better than the 5 puck? :confused:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Still fast enough to have fun (kinda). Time for a modern turbo with a divided turbine housing and a proper twin scroll manifold. I think 400-450kW is a great place to be, provided it's all in before 4500 rpm.
    • i'm not at 600 though 😢 its 484hp (356kw) at the wheels.. 
    • Nice. 600ish HP is probably a nice place to be.
    • In the US the EPA has been going after shops that sold aftermarket ECU tuning software that allowed you to disable CELs for things like EGR, DPF, SCR, or TWC failure. They also went after shops for selling emissions delete equipment. Their logic is that all cars built for street use have this emissions equipment and you cannot do an after the fact conversion to an off-road vehicle not intended for street use. Cobb, Hondata, and similar companies have basically all revised their tuning software such that going forward you cannot suppress DTCs for emissions-critical systems, nor can you toggle systems on and off in the tune like EGR. You also cannot adjust OBD emissions monitoring logic. You can still tune these cars. But you have to do things the hard way, basically. For example Subaru FA20DITs used to delete the TGV system to get spare analog IO for a flex fuel sensor. EGR also has to be dramatically pared back because without the TGVs the stock EGR map causes bad misfires. Now instead they have to implement the flex fuel system as a CAN bus sensor instead. IMO, this is heavy-handed but the EPA in the US gave so much leeway for so long and the aftermarket relentlessly abused that leeway to the point that they could actually see the effects of all these emissions-deleted work trucks on their air quality monitoring for cities that haven't met Clean Air Act standards. It's one thing to have a few people deleting emissions on their weekend car that spends 9 months out of the year on jack stands. It's another thing entirely for entire fleets of tradies driving around 8 hours a day on deleted diesels that emit 1000x the emissions per mile of a compliant vehicle.
    • Hmmm. that's a tough one. There's a lot of history bundled up in that lot. Perhaps instead we can create a new pinned thread, called "Legacy Pinned Threads" and provide links to the these ones that will be unpinned in there. And maybe put the names of the pinned threads that are linked inside in the tags so they can seen from the outside? Or something like? I mean, it's half a step back towards having a more complicated forum structure, without actually having it. But there's a reason that heirarchical architectures exist. They are logical, and if executed properly, make it easy to find something without having any upfront knowledge of where it would be , and without using a search function.
×
×
  • Create New...