Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve

Great find re the link to the autospeed article.

It's funny b/c i had this conversation with Simon back in 1998 when i use to take my VLt in and i agreed with his reasoning back then. Good to see 4 years later (when the article was written) has hasn't changed his opinion.

I'm no pro regarding turbos, and I'm not going to pretend to be (but i know a bit about pumps, turbines and PRV's, which i'll go into shortly). Nissan enginneers put a BOV there for a reason, and with a plastic inlet spool, I'm not going to argue the point too much. My BOV stays. I do worry about the leaking-overspeed thing tho, which it does atm, so i'm buying an aftermarket jobbie. The beauty of actually having a BOV is you can mimic having no BOV if you want, just wind the bastard right up. for me tho, I have to agree with sydneykids' line, and can see how you need to "tune" your bov for best performance.

To clarify, the "turbine" section of a turbo is actually on the exhaust side, it is an impulse turbine, to be precise. The induction side is indeed a pump, and is definately not a turbine,. If it was a turbine, then you'd be able to call any old centrifugal pump a turbine. Although people do still like to call it one, it is not, by definition, a turbine, just attached to one.

So in the case of a turbo, as with any pump, it will pump up to it's maximum pressure/flow, and then it will dead head/cavitate. So this is fine if you cannot reach the top of this pumps' efficiency curve, ie you cannot reach it's max pressure/flow. however, running no BOV you will very quickly reach this point, at which stage, if the pump still had power, it would increase RPM. HOWEVER, as this is a unique pump, in that at the same time you are dead heading it, you are also removing it's power source, it will not increase in rpm, it will simply slow down , and possibly stall and reverse, as it increases pressure in the run to the throttle butterfly, using nothing but the momentum of it's revolution.

No Bov

It is understandable, how no BOV can increase power. If you manage to change gears quickly enough that your turbine has not stalled, you will have increased pressure after the turbo by a substantial amount, at which point you re-open the throttle, and you get a handy rush of 15+psi into the plenum, and hopefully the turbo hasn't slowed down too much to say, 40000 rpm, using the example Sydney Kid provided before, and is able to speed back up quickly and provide boost. But given how quickly it spools up, I'd imagine it would slow down fairly quickly too, so you'd have to be pretty swift in the throttle all the times to not stall the turbo, which is why BOVs probably aren't used so much in racing. Which would tend to point to the fact that if you're car is not a racer, you might be doing a bit of harm to your turbo by NOT driving your car at full noise all the time and dong snap changes.

Race cars, PRV's

In regards to race cars, most of them run pneumatic boxes nowadays, so the need for a BOV is even less, basically, the only time it would possibly be needed is when they are slowing down for a corner. Indy cars still run pop off valves, which I believe are set slightly higher than their on throttle boost pressure, and so act like a "style" of BOV, in that they release excess pressure (why would they want to do that, i wonder?). Another name for a pop off valve is a pressure relief valve, which actuate at one pressure, and reseat at a lower pressure, by way of two diameters that the passing air acts upon. once the PRV is open, the air acts on a greater surface area, allowing it to reaseat at a lower pressure than it actuated at.

Leaky Bov

It's piss easy to understand how this can stuff things up. one, the overspeed issue mentioned before, and two, also mentioned, you lose all your boost pressure as soon as the bov opens. As my understanding of bovs goes, I dont think that either of these scenarios was what BOV's were designed to do, it's just what we're used to them doing.

Best of Both worlds

If you tune your bov to act like a PRV, voila! you have the perfect system. And the beauty of a BOV over a PRV, is that is is alot more tuneable than a PRV, so you can effectively fine tune the pressure at which it actuates, and the pressure at which it reseats, so as to maintain pressure, and at the same time, keep the turbine spooling. All in all MUCH more controllable than running no bov at all, and you dont run the risk of over pressuring your turbo. And the other advantage it has over a pop off valve is that it is vacuum actuated, so at times when you aren't running at full noise, it will open enough so that your turbo doesn't stall or reverse.

So all in all, If your BOV is leaky or worn out, that is bad. If you race, or drive hard ALL the time (ie not really anything you can do legally on the street), and never just stab it and drop off again (to get that "pigeon" sound, non BOV people! and you say the BOV sound is a load of wank!), you can probably run without a BOV. If you drive your car daily, and dont want to stress too much about doing bad things to your turbo, then a correctly set up BOV is the way to go.

I'd better mention that all that is only IMHO! purely based on what I know about the individual components making up the system, and not necessarily the parts themselves. I dont race, I dont tune. But I do know that if my turbo goes bang cause of a mod I made based on what Mr/Mrs X said, they aint gonna be there to pick up the pieces!

I also notice on that le-mans car, the incredibly short run from turbo to butterfly... ie not much stored energy to try and push itself back past the impeller when(if) the turbo comes to a stop... Not nearly as much as something running an intercooler, complete with runs to and from...

The autospeed article is a very good explanation and could be a very good argument against BOV's, and it is if you're racing, and you can keep the "skidding" noise going for the duration of the gear change, which would be pretty easy. You could even say that the skidding noise is a good thing! But I was thinking, what does it mean when the "skidding" noise stops? and there is 50+PSI infront of it, atmo or vacuum pressure behind it, and no exhaust gases powering it? hmmm. HMMmmmmmmm.....

  • 4 weeks later...

just thought i would ad to the discussion.....

I currently have a supersonic bov on 3" i/c pipes and when the car was running 12 psi it worked fine now the car is running 19 psi i get a loud flutter before the psht noise when i change gears and the car pauses for a second so i am fitting a second bov to solve the problem.

Now that should prove that bov are definently needed.

Steve can you tell me how to fix my problem then as you have helped before with useful info i can always just sell the second bov if there is another way.The sound doesnt bother me i just want to get rid of the deadspot on gearchanges.

And you other tools should stop feeding so much sausage to thorpie,and not attack people for no reason behind the safety of your computer screen.

I am not a mechanic so any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

heheh Thorpy would think 294rwkw is fully sick.. :rolleyes:

http://www.fueltech.com.au/auto_turboaccessories.html

It states Highflow version available upon request.

i get a loud flutter before the psht noise when i change gears

Where is the bov located? Near the throttle body as the stock setup?

Maybe its adjusted incorrectly.

czy18e, your post was pretty funny :rolleyes: so many factors that need controlling (and examining)to ensure they dont change, before something can be considered proof :D

Did you change anything when you would up the boost?

Have you tried adjusting the BOV, ie, wind it fully shut, as tight as it will go?

Did the same guy tune it for the higher boost as did it at lower boost?

There are alot of different things, but by the sounds, you have throttle lag (ie, it takes a while from when the throttle is opened to when you are making power) - it could be the fact that you are using a bov that is causing the problems (as I found when I started making over 300rwkw) or it could be a poor tune, if you have changed anything else (eg cams) you could be falling off boost (power band is narrower).

First thing I would be looking at is blocking off, or winding shut the bov as much as possible AND checking its not lifting under boost (as cubes is pointing to)

The reason I say this, is when under full boost, with no bov, and lifting off the throttle, you will get a high pitched squeal, not a flutter sound, the flutter comes later (about 1/2 to 3/4 of a second later) once the majority of the compressed air has reverted past the turbo. On quick changes you cant even here the flutter, just a very quick squeel.

Faults like the one you have can be alot easier to trace when on a dyno though, but definately start by looking at adjustment of the BOV

good luck, let us know how you go.

czy18e, your post was pretty funny :) so many factors that need controlling (and examining)to ensure they dont change, before something can be considered proof :)

Did you change anything when you would up the boost? 

Have you tried adjusting the BOV, ie, wind it fully shut, as tight as it will go? 

Did the same guy tune it for the higher boost as did it at lower boost?

There are alot of different things, but by the sounds, you have throttle lag (ie, it takes a while from when the throttle is opened to when you are making power) - it could be the fact that you are using a bov that is causing the problems (as I found when I started making over 300rwkw) or it could be a poor tune, if you have changed anything else (eg cams) you could be falling off boost (power band is narrower).

First thing I would be looking at is blocking off, or winding shut the bov as much as possible AND checking its not lifting under boost (as cubes is pointing to)

The reason I say this, is when under full boost, with no bov, and lifting off the throttle, you will get a high pitched squeal, not a flutter sound, the flutter comes later (about 1/2 to 3/4 of a second later) once the majority of the compressed air has reverted past the turbo.  On quick changes you cant even here the flutter, just a very quick squeel.

Faults like the one you have can be alot easier to trace when on a dyno though, but definately start by looking at adjustment of the BOV

good luck, let us know how you go.

Thanks steve i will try blocking the bov tomorrow and let you know.

The only other things i changed when turning up the boost was fuel pump and injectors.

The same guy tuned it but we didnt do a road tune and so i didnt find out about the throttle lag until i got out of the city(as it only does it on gear changes on high boost)

the cams are stock.

I am going on the dyno again on the 17th and want to have this sorted by then if i can.

And so when i have the bov jammed shut ie.no bov, it wont hurt my turbo ??

Thanks ill post tomorrow with results but if it doesnt fix it ill have to wait for the dyno.

cheers.

I recently fitted an aftermarket BOV which is yet to be plumbed back. Prior to this my OEM s15 re-circ valve used to flutter when I was on full noise.

My aftermarket bov - anything under 0.5 bar I hear flutter. Anything 0.6-0.7 bar it will blow off.

My question is - what is "correctly" setup. Should I set it up so the BOV vents lower than 0.5 bar?

Steve can you tell me how to fix my problem then as you have helped before with useful info i can always just sell the second bov if there is another way.The sound doesnt bother me i just want to get rid of the deadspot on gearchanges.

And you other tools should stop feeding so much sausage to thorpie,and not attack people for no reason behind the safety of your computer screen.

I am not a mechanic so any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.

If you're having dead spots on gear changes do you have a plumback BOV or atmo? Mine was doing that when I had mine atmo because it would be getting too rich. Plumb it back and try then.

Otherwise it might be set too tight or you have no BOV. When my BOV was too tight (i.e. pretty much like not having any BOV) my car would stutter as the turbo shat itself, almost like a surging.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...